HomeMy WebLinkAboutFin Comm 11/13/1974G
., ,. ,, --�-� • rn -- r^- --- y-� �-?*ti Y �, _ -^-5 G.-� OWN
N ^p- 1 121111
-moi-?-1
LI)
-T
i, 1ASS C: TIE?T ..
974
. !"� ��� 3 ES � � l rte,
^{4t G
z;
S ,
� +w� �..r' � B � i �
'T
; I
,
r, ,
_
i
. _ I c ® ® may. _
Ti
Q
11 0 _ b 1:7 I`t �_ 0 EV A e� ' __' e 1 �1 �,,. c i e V�� ed 1 �� e� r 1 i 1«` �
+!-To c; c; u , -i� t e a ni a El r m 11L e_r,
Y tom- re
ill" , (
^;
ment, 0, t 1: 1 C ES it 11 C! ED 11 It r, L
I y
,_I':&LSI pe 2, _ nnae .
„
Tbe
t✓
a tLl vir ✓ t > _,{.%n ., i �', ' k_C�! t El di r'y L5 ��I
,
T
Nil
_ -7
been cttocsenc,
�-e-cieved notice that we had won
i 1 . V + ✓ 5`4 t \% _, o .1.� J2 � � .tel ' a :, �' c 1� t f c « i the
1
R_ i
i ! ? C t {^a lam% _ - 11,
_ 1 {..r f7 I . �� c e '`,.� c f J e ., e i ^r o � ~� t s
j)
`%, c e ?11 � E, e : Vii. f a � t t Ell' 0 f t %� & !Ik E7
! � (f y b �, , `a 1 f o f t V k i' 4 e �_. l-. 1 �,,. +.` , i d,iJ � .i. `..1. J... i.1 E�'.r V",.. � t, i
3 ✓" 1 !-"; l \1 �' ''_a -'�- ±q
per.. IT 17 �., �, i.',• ,_.t C f 7 i y ; i r , e
11 l l �.r
11 e 17 la c.:- c c� t 11 Sa t�
- t ra
_, 4J ��. :. - f �' Ir,' _ J_ `._• �.::. .-.�,.. ; 1 t"'` a V y F�.�El `psi _.., AM E t' t -OL ] `�r'� u l .- li ions
�
. LL
-f
- °
f
1 _. t� X12 t_ r�
i ; ; v :� ` -1 _ E! C! W s � . r c� ie lE
C
,
s
l
7t. In e 1-� c i
it
(t - V i �+
the repai11 c
4 .
a t;tt ` � L i' rill C C' .� 1 1 :� n0 fn V ll E
fir:
IN
VIS Rif-IL"''noe cco,-nitt7-e
r,c�
'L,o, "Vote on the
V C! t E? W R S t 1117 EY r,
b C
t o, --n
n t fro -r- thoce items -
vie PCs t17 E!
.fiery' CV 1) EY in ji n
f c V 0 t S 110 11 d
ma
1) e El c e c E-, e- 7,nct
ote-,(d at.
tj 11 E! C 0 t
p `,L t,��, I 1� pap io o in 10 EM
n m i t, t e e t
71T 0 6 VOTY! in
r7 � f ? ^ formatim
kilt) 101whell
Ti
t I
c he d i-� -1- ef �--t -Cn
0
t e t c,j-n n, II
d 11 j 0 ED C
fF
A T
R, tic) rill a C, a
pl
----------------------
77
-
,
a-
r
r-
2 ,
,
Other o nems
:
Good rel a t i onsh i p w" th l_ i ght Department
Hudson
w
1 a t i on 1 6, 295
�-
e man, one(l)ca1� tYia rtPersonnel,
one (l j ful1 t r� {
,
No, of,Boxes
135 Boxes on five (5) c i rcu i ts,
,
,,Equipment
PICKUP Truck � i t was noted - that a bucket truck --would nc�t be r
necessary for the amount of work Primary access to the
P oles is b climbing. Electric Department a uimens is
used, as well as the aerial ladder truck®
•
'
Nevi Development
• , 3
_ �=
, 'Policy
Town By-law re uires tea t the developer pay and install all
fire a a rr extensions ® Town 'does not ' nta i n fire alarm
boxes for private industries, :.
,
L i ne � tens ion®
Done b fire alarm maintenance personnel .: i
y ,
Other Comments-
ca
None �
4} M w dd 1 ebor®ugh
Population 1s ,
Po ;
a
IIs
u E4.
•
Personnel -
one(1) 1 ect r i c: Depa rtinen t personnel maintains e system Fs
on-apart-time bas is°
No. of Boxes
r •
9
•
qu t pmen t
On 1) hyd ra u l ' c ladderwhich i� or�ned h 'the Fir-Department
New Development
F PolicyExtension
of 1 r hes a t the cost of the T' n. F re a armboxes,'
P, er,
re urchased�and ma i nta i ned by the developer.
,
L* ne Extension-
:
Done by the Town r - ,
'
Othercmnents
Gtion on bet�een �• ght department -and FireDepartment
,
5 } s i ch
,
Pty ulation 11 18 f
P ,
..�tia11y done by,the ii�htPersonnel Maintenance service is par
Department''
,
e iand partially done in a contract-with Pre Alarm RepairF
Service, Light Department personnel � i nta i ns syse on off - F
,
duty time and s not pa id overtime, it Js considered extra
,
, ,
duty, The money -I s pard from the F re Dep rtrnent
.
,
, o.Boxes
' '
. �h miles of ire
�boe� � �a
New Development
I �. y
r pays or he cos o 1 new i n 't 1 la t, o'
Deve o f f 1
,j
Line Extensio
re e r ��ent P a s car -�er°�a Nc� oast is charged t® thy'
y
De t- meat r ht D artmen equ f menu
y e s
th LiDhDepartment., .: ,
however, department
ionship t
expresses sore p rob l ems �� i th `the a 1' l oca t i ion of t i me fore
-' cs,. r o acs r i rrn r^mnnn%J rmnn 1 rc t'ka hr%Yne
a1
Y
x
- ,
,
,
p
-
3
6' } Templeton
population , 2
unc t is divided
Community
into four fir e rec i n t s. e entireFire.'Department
i re alarm system.,
s run on a vo u n tee r basis and there e s n ®
,
a
a
7) G rovel_an d:
Popu 1 ation 5,1256
,
a
No Street boxes
i;
001 s �; a � r i va to industry and
Fire alarm systems to school , p
to the Department
system .,Fire
. 'churches all cones through the -telephone ,
,
$ Groton,
r
a i y
population 5, 5
....
for the
me . ..
One(1)part-time � personnel ..who works . fu t i �� .
Pe rsonne l
Tele ` hone Company , Works on wee .en s � � r`
pf a�
t ,
, of No Boxes
5 -
Equipment
uses Electric Department equipment
, \
,
New Development
Developer installs an pays for f ire alar etens.ion.'
Policy
• xtens ion-
Line
• personnel.
Done by the part time
.,
Comments
Other C o s
� o
�Light8 pe � rtmen . I f 1 i ght- _department
Good �ooperat i on with the P
on a w a l 'so change .over f i re a 1 arm
a
i s .chang i ng wires res pole
ru
a .
,
system
a
:
9 Middleton
.
'22 6
population � \
Personnel
fire department men are a s s i nod to the work but not
2 or 9
on a full time basis,
o� of Boxes
60 mes of open cable; a
5 with ' • r
•
Equipment
to et access to the lines.
Pickup ruci�:. Men c 1 g ��b the poles 9 nat ve o
p alter
a sat i sact®ry
t was noted that this was x not • is
ems. A l of of major or
Chief due o safety problems*
the Fire
done y the Electric Departments
don b -
New Development
evel
policy
;
. doe✓
+per
t he Town the ork .
Developer o er pays for the extension . T
boxes connec t i ons . P r i vase
for ester
Town m s not respons i b e ethe town incurs on private
d for an ex ns
°es billed y Pe
a
in dustr i are
,
propertye.
.a ,
Town does ma
, L t ne Extension jor extension
range °
Ye long r n etheon thdepartments*netween
atcoperatioherCommentsGoourchased as this is
e truck be
bu
a
a
would recommend that a c
nd,a buwoulrecomme cket truck with a
_
the safest approach*
,
.
, v a
, x.
,
30 f oot boom.
, a a ,
: a
� a
,
, t
1) Paxton
n
Population 3,562
,
�t
department
PersonnelintenanCe
in the Electric C7
n a effort wi
joInt
, ,
No f Roes
' '
5 ,
,
u i p anen t -�
E q p
Electric ec t r i C Department Equipment
_
New Development
, , ,
Polies
a ,
Develo responsible er car ma i n extens ion , ,
,
,
}
,
Line Extension
t
No Comment
.other Comments
i x
None {
1lhe�'riiac
fff
.Papulation 3s284
E
'
Personnel -
,
One Fireman paid ext ra
Boxes
-
N
,
u i cent
q p
Utilizes i gh t Department equipment
New Development
Po i
a of extension new
FireDepartment viI pa f�- the cost,,
development
, L0 ne Extension
Do mai6r extensions themse I ves
Other Comments-
None
,
,
-.
-
•
,
,
,
" t
'
,
-,
,
f
i
i
, ,
t � n
, , I
,
'
TSE BEACON s NOVEMBER 11, 1974 - ��T v u l
t'
THE OLD ORDER CHANGETH .
c
r
nFca.m fan Mayan Sean M. Dunphy
2nd �? a &) co ncgnatuZate6
Pa,s t P�Le�sident and No , p S exec a� FeZ-k' x Jutiani (3td,
r
cted League P�LeJsident aad WeUe6tey - �, 7
n etot y e� e - �{o.� a e Ma a� GU Utiam Taupie
a/s Second nd Vice P� e/sid ent and y , y n R�c�Cand
,� �a n) , • and ��.a o-�i.��.ne Exec e S ec�ce�a y �
to n) and Fit6t Vice P�Le/siden� �
Leahy (4thp Z to �.j Zook on.
Boston
Massachu
The Beacon is published monthly Y
-
onthl b the Massachusetts League of Cities and Towns, 6 Beacon Street,,
setts 02108 617-742
-2334 or toll free 800-392-6173. The Beacon serves as a medium of exchange of ideas and information
for the officials ofMassachusetts municipalities. Subscription and advertising rates available on request.
Joan Benson Administrative Assistant
Kennedy Shaw, Editor
Norman Tidemann, Managing Editor ,
E BEACON
14
c
LEGISLATOR AND OMEY AWARDS
r
For the first time the League presented Outstanding Legislator 1
g g ator Awards at ,r
the -Annual Meeting Receiving the awards were two Senators and ''two R
epresen-
tatves including: Senator Joseph J.C. DiCarloD-Revere
( ), Senator- John H.
Fitzpatrick (R -Stockbridge), House Speaker David Bartle(D-'Holyoke)and
R y ,
Representative Joseph D. Early (D -Worcester)®
Continuing an old tradition, the -League presented the Annual Outstandin
g
Municipal Employee of the Year (OMEY) Awards in four diff u
stent population
categories. Award winners included® Mr® Raymond OueletteArlin ton
( g ) , Mr.
Henry J. Dernalowicz (Gardner), Ms® Isobel MoranCant r
Moran(Canton), , ..and Mr. . Leo S ® Hurme G
(East Princeton) .
Honorable Mentions went to Mr. Samuel R, Moschella(Revero.) Ms. Alice R. white I
��
(Milton), Mr. Alfred Denault (Sturbridge), Mr. Walter Be Sha,w Sutton
), Mr.
Francis F. Andrews (Berkley), Ms. Grace O'Gara (South Hadley) Mr. C. William
gg (Walpole), Mr. George Sousa (Falmouth), Ms. Jeanne F. Bass(Spring-,'field Mr. ..Arnaud R. B
), Iackadar (Chelmsford) and Mr Gu Fuller Bo lston .
Anothe.r. 'new award this year was the Kenneth E Pickard
Memorial.Innovation
Award. The award is named in honor of the League's former Executive Direct
or . �
The award was presented to the Town of Danvers for its Program Budgeting-
System, and to the Town of Plainville for its Purchasing Encumbrance Procedure. E
o
G
MUNICIPAL ANNUAL REPORT CONTEST
It was announced, at the League's Annual Meetingin Worces
t er last month,
that the annual reports of these six municipalities were chosen
as the" best
"
in their population class by an independent three-member panel:
Alford
Edgartown Lynnfield
Chesterfield Mansfield
Needham.
.
These specific reports were forwarded to the New England Council to represent
Massachusetts in the six -state municipal report competition P p p tion for 1974. Serving15,
on the League's selection panel were Suzanne Tompkins Senior Res
P .' earth
Analyst, Massachusetts Taxpayers'
Foundation; Stuart DeBard, Executive Director
Mass. Association of Town Finance Committees; and Robert J.M.N,
O'Har
Director, Division of Intergovernmental Personnel 'Programs, N.E. Region, U.S.
Civil Service Commission.
EEO SAND THE CITIES
r
EEO and the Cities contains a v i
variety of perspectives on current issues n
equal employment opportunity for municipalities. P s. Based on the proceedings
ofaspecial workshop on EEO held at the 49th annual Congress of Cities in
San -Juan, Puerto Rico, the report included discussionf•
o .
�affirmative action programs
for minorities and women
merit system standards
selective certification
* reporting and recordkee in requirements
� P g a nts
test validation
hiring goals anda
uotas
�
impact of recent court cases
- ., , ,
>?..
--- _— ,
_ , `r... nG i _,
:
.„
, I
r
,
i ,
.-: , ^j , 11
d : -
I
,+
I
.
„ .
, ,
�1\1 1AG
, 9 ',
_ ,
- -
' � I � II
.,
_ II I ,' `9,,
, v�,.
I
. ,
. _ .
, ,
,,III% " � � .
I .I
I II
I I "I
I I I I
- I
I I I ,
� I I
I II
. I � I
I - I I I �
I I I ,
''I'll 1, ;111
, I
1, � . I I � I I I i � .
I � 97�-
'November' er 6 , 1 - , ' ' I D" 11
II
, i : , rl�
I I.
� `
I - �,
I I. r -
I ��_
I -I - II 'i , � -�, '>
;, ,
I _� . , ,
,�' � I , . r
I ��', II
'' I , , � I I'.,
I � I � I I ,� I
� I
�� _ I I
I, 1, I 11
� '' , I - " , ,
,I
, 1, -1 I, ,,, I
I I I .
''I - I - ,:�',
, � �, I � I i I'':. - i��
". I - � , �I 1, � I � I _11� I I I I 1, :, �i ''I ", -;I'
�1_1 .
k1tI: � I I
I I , � , , I I
I 11 I I I I i I - , � � i I -�_�, : �, � I �
�, 1; , - . , i I �'�
" I I - I - I , I ,� , , I I , ,
I 1-''. I I I - 1: �� !. 11 �_ . �!_f, t �' - I i I - � I I , - , I � , �1'1
I I �
-i, �' � � - � I I . I _ I � ,
.
_�
,i;, I I - I - . I - � I ":-. . . I
''I'll'' . � i
I I �- . � - 1_� I I I 11, -1 11
, i � I I ''I . I . - ,
I
I �
I ,��,._ * . ''I
^
, �_
. N
��
T�1ORAl�TDUI_tliI - I,, I I
t� t
,. ,
,
Planning B d
ital Im rovement Commute,' ann ng oar , w
To : t FinC opo , Cap p
. 11
r : ,
I ,
, .
,, . , . , 11
, ��
,
FROM: • Board of Selectmen
M
arin Pum d.s
SUB�TECT :41,� Use o f Revenue Sh g
,il
41
eti of the Massachusetts Selectmen's Asso ciatio
At a ace c ent me ng
I I'll, 11"
e wi s doffi o f a pl�ring revenue sharing �
Congressman s sman Cronin emphasized th P
i
I ds t award s the funding o f imp oct ant c ommunit�r improvemen- s . Dur ng . ".
fun t
1 11 .,
the3 Y ear trial. funding, the Congress will see if the nation' s co��muni-
f llow that a proac, or if they jus t us e the revenue sharing funds
ties o p
rmal taxation locally, This Board wants � to be sure 11-1
to substitute for no "
t,
• nue slzarin funds are applied as prescribed bar �I
that in the future neve g .,
I +
- 11
f usin it to offset operating expenses of
federal legislation Instead o g •
, , .
the Palice Fire Department, and Highway Departmen , e c. _ ,. „
.,
en directed. to recomnoend a proposal in this ..,
The T own Manager has b e 1
I
l related : to the Capital Improvement Programs.,
egaxd, probable strong I
, I I
__14 1 If �
- �.,
I'� -1 I - — I I 1, _ I �,
o
� I : �! �'- �, - . � I I 11 - i� �. �,,�, '' -
� —, - I - 1, 1. 1,
- I., I � ., 1. - � '� -
I , . I -
„
.
.,.
le 1.
, ,
I ,
,li,
Y
DAH dlh „ , .
"I I'll -
,
, .
. � ,
,.
. ;
_ .
. ,. _
11�
I 1.
. , . -
,
,. ,
,_ � ��, �,, I I
— I
— I � I 'i
''
.
t t
„,
" , " ,
_ ,
- ,
.. i
,::
s
x -
t,, , ,
�,,
f:, .,
.
" i , - •
,..
,
I; 1.
,
I"
:x „
.
- I . I � I I I
. � I 1, — I 11i, I � 1, �.�111
I I :1 ,. I'llI I'll � __ I ':
I � — I I I
I —, - I �
I I
� I
I � 11 — I ''I'', - I . , I .
I ,� - � � I I � — " �
., I - . - 1. I
- ': I
I I I . ,
I , ,, - , I I I I � I I - I 11 � — .1 I � — I I I I'— ". I ., I � � _: I
. .
, _ r
_ : .
. . . .
- _
'.. , r
- , - , -
, - -
, ...
- - - ' _ - . ,:
- 1_ - ..
_ _
, . . r'
-
���
. ... - -
- Ny
, ... - !�
,
, -
, - I .1•
I
, i
, . , r
r
' - -
,
- .. : ,. -
,
t
. . .. -
_- -
.. , , ... -
,
+. " ,.
I X,t , ,
1 '
" ,
„ t
" �. .
t, 1
I,
J I
:.
r g,
.a.rti
e ^ :
r '�. to r
j �. - -1 I, ,. r
a 1i
I nc ....,: , ..
r " i
...
.�'ii
', .. .
_.
„ . '. -
:.
. s ^ t
r .-
I
r
, . -
, : t
'F:
r - : - -
:. -- _
1 _
a': _ -
1 V r ` ,
, ) , r -
in
,
,, ' - _
'I i •.. .:, , ' +
, t, - ' '
^. 3 , -
w , r , r , ,
,
iii` r , n.. , : � �.,
I
i � F i. i-. , , I
r , r ,. ., i
V
.. , _ a t - _
, -+ ..
.,
,. , .,,
:; ,
- , ,
.w
' . :.r i.
I'll" , .,
I -
r
,
,
- .'
,." ':,
I-
_ t ,
^ ,.
�. .. ' _
', -
,- , r
,i. r -
, r
',
" ,... , t.. r a ,. .. .,. t, '.,t
., - -
, , -
, . , a ,.: , x r --
S , , ' , , , ,
': , -
, ,. E _
,. , , i , , iI 11 fI f
:. _ ..
.'
t r " , , .
f
... _
, r1. ..
i
,
" ,�' ''
'. , ,
i
, ,
,s cit ,, .,_., , ::I t
, ,
a r'T
.. -, „ , ' ,t
t ,: t
i _ I ,
, i
,. ", .,. .• '9 t .. i .', , -,. .. F i -
11 I
1.
t
b, $
K:
-
5 .I NSF E D, 'IvI.ASS.,- THURSDAY', EMBE'� 14, 974
,
7
, A , „
, t
r _
0,
:re P d
n
II
k.
,
AL
• ..• ion
orm C 00
r
We can iii 'no
-
In aSeries":of �oiht meetings
'iris'®' �' ra sfer � �
wa be sure that' we copld pint
Y.
beld� ; Wednesday night ht' tie ;
Three ;solutions were put
an end to all leaks to say
Munni al ; Huildin g Corn-
•
forth at''the meetin of the
g
- that these" -funds .���would,,
l�itt'ee; ythe School Committee
School the
Committee and
'
, positively stop leaking in this
and the ' Board of Selectmen
MBC, -,i -'It, was su ested -that
" roof would 'be misleading:
a' roved action which w11
Ap
the :School Committee
mmittee coo
cannotguarantee',anything°
authorize an expendituire of
Eithel• seek a transfer of funds ;
for this~ amount of .`money"
$8000 for the.;, ternporary
from the- Finance Camrnittee
He .did say that, with the ,;
patching of ; the high school`
on an emer enc basis do .
g y
ro osed re air, I. believe
p p p
: roof, which.,"has leafed since
nothing at all and wait out the
your.- school program " -could
its construction Elva ears
y
winter with7a stead flow of
y
proceed ;`through the winter
ago.. �
g
x tivater into' the school, or use
without interruption.
p
After the School Committee
u its :Maintenance -Fund to
p
I voted , 8-2 to appropriate
,. f -
i�lstitute the repairs.
Yer ie eair
,, the money, from its own "
After extensive discussion
The plan that was ; ap-
Maintenance Fund, they
with FinCom members David
proved, at Nault s recom
moved immediately to the
Clemmey and John Gilleran,
mandation, was that a roofer,
next room"of'-the Town Hall to
it was decided that the
under the su ervision of
p
seek authority to ,waive
transfer'of funds would not be
t head custodian Arthur
Naul ,
normal bidding procedures in
feasible at this time because
Faria and Superintendent of
-
order to undertake ,the patch
the School Committee still
Schools John Collins, be hired
Job as soon as possible..
has money in the Main-
10 'work on a per diem basis,
k
The temporary repair of
tenance , " Fund. A transfer
t�peiling up ,sections of the
the roof, in lieu,, of replacing
would only be possible when
the entire roof,- next spring
and summer, was originally
the funds have been com-
pletely depleted.
roof c membrane and finding
intended �.'by the Municipal
Gilleran added that he
_ the, source of leaks. }
Building Committee (MBC).
believed that the situation
-After finding the leaks,,.he
However, Chairman Norman
could not be referred to as an
will place layers of 15 -inch ��
Mahana explained that Town
emergency at all', since
felt over t a leaks and
Counsel James' Grady-.' had
serious leaking has occurred
replace e lace the membrane. Na ut
ot -
ruled that the MBC could not
, for several years. He also
noted that such a procedure,
use part;of the '$335,000 ap-
-use
termed `the emergency
done on insulation which he ,
proved for roof replacement
waiver of normal.;bidding
said is soaked completely
by this year's Town Meeting
procedures "an unholy
throughout the whole roof, is
for the, --,te'mp'orary repairs.
precedent to establish. He
j the best of several
It was Grad s opinion that
y' p
said that the School, C o,n_
y
9 desirable -shout-term
the .state 'Emergency, . Fun-
m i t t ee, if it took such a
solutions.
ding Board," which has yet to
course, would .. be
" This plan, supported by
approve, the new, high school
`` either ill-advised,
e
�y Collins, will reduce several
roof, would consider - illegal
�, extremely courageous, or not
� dangers , in the school -but I
the tapping of the bonded
running for re-election."
the extent of that reduction
�•Vok
$335,000. ,�� ���
Gilleran cited the factthat
could not be determined.0
Since the MBC could riot
no guaraiitee��can be made
��'Presently, there is of both fire
use the intended money, the
doing" about
'that the patching job will hold
�' and electrical shock, because i
`a the school's electrical system
task of something
the, escalating leaks in the
:`� ,back the water this winter.
Architect O.E. fault -who '
3 is exposed to the winter
C
high school .came before the
has been hired by the MBC to
flooding. The atch job will
�� g'• p J
.i School Corgmittee, where, it, i
., sign the new roof'
de
according ," �" to�Nault,
faced. strong objections from
several "times that the patch
somewhat alleviate that
two'- of. 'its own merxibers,'
Sob will only partially stanch .
danger. Far also supported
g pp
Richard . Blandor and alta
the l flow. He, said that" for
a
this solution . because of the
�_ _ �._ - --- �"
Latham. -
, $B4OOU, roughly 60 to 90 per -
minimize
� fact that .it� will mi
}
cent of thea leaking would
-stop'.'But`'
further damage to th'e also
he added ` ``That .
seriousl dama ed school.
roof 'is rn such deplorable ,'
p
Faria not that, at present
condition... that water standards, this, is an $8 to $10
'
'
.
could be enterin in man
many
`i:million building."
"I don't like to see a good
locations.
building go downhill," Nault "
told Selectmen later, "which
4
r
ro
porters cif . the patching plan
were "talking $8000 all of a
sudden," and "talking safety
all of a sudden."
He stated that, in case of
OP ®sition
leakage into,, areas : where =
S c h e o 1 ;; C o m m i t,t a e`
.,x
electrical equipment exists or
Chairman :,Gary'Willis', , in
where the water might cause '
ro osin the lan ;.to thedangers,;
g�. , Pthe
.
best solution
', Selectmen, ,` noted " e
Would oe to evacuate students
' which < his
h vvh
reluctance , :with
. r n
and use the area only when it
c . ed .'i® use the
committee a re
g
is dr until the new -,
dry, ' roof. is
funds on. - an,- emergency
constructed,
timetable.
3
r
However, whm Committee
.'We,,,, feel " that this is :a
member ' William Bruno had
t
dan erous4, precedent to se ":
g y_
placed,a motion on the floor
he said;.;but:. we feel -that
to table the matter and -do y
some action must be taken:"
nothing until a greater`
`{ `I personals think we're
y
emergenc arose that
y
#browing money down the
motion failed 4-1, with both i
drain, '' , adl`i1l ed ; Co1�1mittee
Blandori and Mrs. Latham ,
member - James Hindman
voting against it. F
��but Go
earlier, P d hes us if a
.
major fire ,,happens,.:
Mrs-. Latham accused the
^down
there-.",
MBC of footdra in statim
gg g�
th Hindman and Willis
that, "If this were; properly,
Voted fcir, the use of Maim K
handled we wouldn t have to .
,
'
tehance Fund monies. The
o through this."' She stated
g g
` major, opposition came from
the belief that, if the MBC had
.
Mrs. Latham 'and Blandori:
expedited construction as
P E
Blandox�i, in speaking to the
soon as the bonding was x
Selectmen, . stated ' that the :
approved at the Town
PP
'diet t er solution might be to
Meetingin' May, then "the
� � Y� ,
tolerate the problem, as has
;y
roof n ight already be up.
been done` for the past three
P
Mahana took violent issue
winters and not � take any
:with Mrs. Latham. He stated
action at., this , time. He
that the MBC, in, order to
' the sup-
'co lamed ;that .
avoid a second roof fiasco,
_ �,»��►►,t,.......�.._���-
had taken particular pains to
acquire an architect. Nault
signed his contract with the
-Town on August, 27. From ;
that point until almost the ;
present, the' MBC, said
Mahana, has been seeking
the approval of the
Emergency Funding Board
and seeking legal approval of
use of the bonded funds 'for,, t
the temporary patching.
Mahana added that, even if
these procedures had gone
more gnicykly, weeks would
be _' consumed' in -drawing,
y
revising and approving` plans
for the new roof. He said,
' `There is no way that you
could have got-ten that roof up
before the winter." E
Because of Mrs. Latham's
accusations, Mahana.. asked _, to
that the School Committee r
establish a liaisonto attend
ns MBC meetings,
. << _
r preferably, it s to
H
P judge
y
whether the . committee is : r
indeed g too lingering long n
g gi
its deliberations. ._Willis
promised that his committee
i,would act on the matter. :
iTFGhh1�-� 1��
TOWN'OF MANSFIELD
Fw,MASSACHUSETTS
CAPITAL IMPRUVEMENT P.ROGRAM CO 19
� 1
... .
October 31,1, 1974
SS
PRELIMINARY IMPROVEMENT
presentsThis su r i t i nthe 19 of ?-w76
t r u 1Capital
improvement P
nt rogram The
nt requests r b the various us `r n
Agencieshave been summari with res t
b Information tb has been
submitted t bCommittee. b programming in is
requestsIS ths
responsibility of
t i Improvement i t « i n order to program
these projects Into i u1 priority
list, the rating system tha t was used
In 1972 will b us d r
this r sfollows,
�f i� s
F
pos tponed.
PRIORITY «
which cannot reasonably be
These may Include those ,d d to complete n esimumsential
partial l� �iis r t i in yinpresently-w
P
established departmental r r, r t t emergency
situation.
PRIORITY "NECESSARY" Projects which should be carried out within
a few yearso to meet i
depar-t
or for r c
i t rfacilities.
mental programtpansion
PRIORITY C.
'DESIRABLE" Projects needed for a proper ex
departmental progremo
available. The exact timing -of these can waituntil funds are
ts wh;ch would
PRIORITY D. 14)EFERABLE11 Projec ope
recommended for i «
r b i c n t t be.
i t yservices.
followingThey can be postponed The i i s ition of the s
Capital
Program Is ,r i majorh the
Improvement
c ractivities.
The i i
counti
Committee t r
Indicates the i b
:Ti o _ project represent t
subsequenthe estimated
« s
r Inflation
cost at present value,. n ` t rs
-for an -a
Included*
4D
A. Gene,ral Government
Revaluation 1Priority
revaluationThe.last r r «
In t
1 in the
expansion 1similar survey r
equest
n Assessors ilk not make a form
r
itiated by, the
this project as they feeli i
t i
residential
This project l c l real mrket
value. At presento t
he
commerical and Industrial, on a fair
based on 1962
on W/o of the
project of this
This apparatus will replace. the 1947 ladder trUCK, wnicn 15
The new
In need of repaIr and diff Icult to get parts for,& 1P.
apparatus will have an estimated useful life of 20 yearso
The 1947 truck would be used as either a reserve apparatus
or trade It In. An account was established in 1973 for this
equipment and It presently has a balance of $55,000. The
estiveted cost of this truck, if ordered In 1975 will' be
between $115,000 and $125tOOO. The delivery date from the
time of order Jq two years, The Fire Chief noted that It Is
possible to save money on the price if payment is made In
advance as this wo 11 hold a bid price.
Recomended Action 1974m7506 $35,000 (75--76)
submittede
Recome-nded Action 1974--7560 $16,000 (not voted)
C. Chief's Vehicle P r I o r I t)�
The Fire Chief recommends
in 1975%-76. The existing
approximately 50,000 miles
In 1973. The Chief noted
replacement of the Chief'S vehicle
i a 1969 Buick, which has
vehicle 's
on it, The engine was overhauled
that the mileage reading is not accurate
"
a
October 31
7
Page 3
a
time on the engine.
nt of I dd) a
s � � �'
2
"tea , 8� �`� � $ OU 00
r VJ � � • N
gyp• �y. ,,�f[� �`'' z� y _• ,.� � a "
�✓ �� �.� � � 4 C`a. �:v �.,r ! ta+' f �Ll� �, Y .. I %z, $ �C -
o �'
�
p
4
ion 9, 7 4 -4 7 5), 000 (75"76)
do
f; C a •t:a tl g u Y, ' , si3.. '' u r jig
r l k " '' ,1 Y Id r t*'i is e e e, s 7 J a'- Rescue
LIS-ec-1 tO aid 11, In other
-ould be
@ Yt� Kao not ,t. a ted '.re. i� �� �l
`
'lpte- €gamy. ( However,
ypgi..,,' theFi
'�{ !p!0 type, operated
sed
eligible for 50% reimbursement. from Civil Defense. The
pecki"Iceitioris wtould be. pri-e-pared by the Fire Department. The
wpt;
estingated cost of thlishi R $15,000.
$15,000 (7 q- 76)
Recormended Action 1074-75"
•
68
+
Modular m Priority -
4
it, 19the �m/ ti" '� �� - q _ u � c ham-. �` have
Q� o,` p g®a*� �° �e+c, ^?`�} _'
� r mgr �.�`
�: � �,L ^�' � 1 i �� ��' t&..r Th ss � @ [ � Y� this unit In
Modular
191 o- tl ,. $2590.00,b.rd re i s� y' g State reimbursement
�+ s `d' � presently known.
-he details r'
on "9 however
new &M0 'lam f L C .' i Y
L.
d
L -c presently being
�� .�� f 5a �. AG ry kd� :. `- � recommends
trained D Q b1 s ir:i r,Pa_
s�
1that bY%csYu e �'Sani k*s be appropriated
in tl.
y®' �`r - 9
Ton
:- �
'1
�4L+typ' ^iia' sa*< saie:' onz
The 1/2 j'ort of an Y ng
� a
d be y 4 R.5 sed
i h t 5, r t,,!.a3 e- '': r ',-o r �- al _ Y� t d i �'wr '' t 'L'
1 b f h vi'k a
C.
r � wu
.{¢� (( :. n i�W:
q and
6L
f or p i fw ng ri g p, h.a A N .F i }i H i
®®® R Ss+ S
ship to ,yndt
� �
{ �
�
9 d
CB r b t o
.
@gym kph' pp�y e - 0 [ fy
at this
V a" '+r/ � � � .d Y h �ts �+ � ' t c ALS » � d
he does nr j V I y estimates a the cost to r ,pit the roof
MU
r �
h. Fire Alarm Extension
In 1972 the � l to Improvement �- r n r comme4L
� s
Mr the annual extension of f ire alorms. There
ment of an a'ccount
are, within appof open copper wire, rstely 2c �
w i � a ea t.' rep
lac . The f1realarm extension and repair
h,.
-77
October 31, 1974
page
program has not got involved wl th the. t of I Ines
it t ications i subdivisions.
as they are only putt;ng in nev,.4i appropriation
of $20500 as the FireDr t`jic : presently has a full time
i t e a a rm ma i n teas n r
Re
. u
commendedAction 1974
New
Fire tai " n P - i rit The Nre �Chief noted that the present fire statton faci i i ties
be
r not adequate d Hetes that a new fire stat i d
e
Constructed. This proposal has been
'nwho d t i o that w
Underwriters s t? a
recon
fire t ti tut t vicinity industrial
fief
r et �� . Mr definitive irn4 i i t
ie twith respect t� location d design r i
teria.
No cost estimate, has been submittedthis im
Recommended Action c ob referred to Buildingi
ltteee
r t p
a. Cruisers Pr
Writy
The icy i d t replacement cruisers.
The cruisers r used t is e rt ent on a 24 hour basis*
The s i d cost, of replacement of t j o cruisers Is $7,000
R
Recortmended Action -756 (annua
r d Vehicle PriorltY .
The
The Chief recommendst. r c i t t t.unmarked
tR i�sed upon the use which t getsreplacemept
s determined by the A-�ruun t of rilleageand the age of the vehicle.
c ~mend d Actio `i t.15
u
c. Additi onai Cruiser
The
i i iestimate
that rw n d I t I on Cruiser � i i� t
17. - correspond with the addition
be purchased in 1976."h T11 J S
of personnel to the Po ice Department.
Action tc
„ g 0 7
Reconmiended-d. Priority
The -its_
acsprovided in t � for i,
completed rt O the original construction nge was not
r t
con ri nd that t pistol r it d i t
cost of the project has not been det r n d at this time. However,,
the Chief notesthat monies may be evailabler the Civil
r i t *nt the o Halle
Recommended Actiond request
Rr
197
t
.�
A '7'
� �'. �� �
_ �r � 4
A
of bui Idings o piping
t 1, o n s i:. r u
Th i s p C 'CL at 6e sewage treatment
. y
equ i p a nt ch�* a � � UG
v
0 �,
A I t h g � _
1.
at U
x_
. ' C ntend
tw � . 4� .. t t 4.A �cs fm;
�`p . a
t has t 0
M, d v upotl
a
. {
to be done about continued
f 11-1 t t 'n e"' C;
eels thn.excess
1
educes plant vc)JuRia and storage 0
r` T
sludge r
x
a
All
_ nr '
Currently;
Ing
which takes extended t t o cl r y 'I n sl
dge d rt/b s&
t plant
led on jff�provarrents of the treatmen
"Vn
d cstim, ted cost
Untl I the regional all progress Is bein 0006
$5000
r
Action5 re
of "'. e,'
e to, pave tale, , �driveway
The Sewer
_Depnru-a s ro r
eti
-t c' C t
arking alre-zi at9)IJI th, �Itment P1 1,
Plant,' P"sonnel and visitorso
.. access
,. t Rte` t � s jtplowing
to
g ,fie @ 6g peffi� �',,�� ¢¢y pD ("� ;�, . �� .h �. � � � ° � � �,, Q'—`
I F{ � `� rt. t C G 5 6 moi' 'H.+ `r R �° ,:... • g 3 { p ' ° s '4rd has
.
h!"51 Za rids T In ti
et
be occ
a
i N 7 7 d')
co{,e r
w
�.
a r"! ed f r
y f p r jj
sa- t'.tc L. *"'�fl l V3 *,,1a' �. (10• 1 g Iii�1 .mom' -'" $
•
�+.>d3l.shfi+•f.,.��.a:dhlt4@'a..«,.$.-....v�b"�':'ats 3'Y:.: 9.YF..s{y- �• exist* �q
t �' fr � C. Sir x Ing
�
a' k+ y'� k !' /` F`�?i r Y} dim' pmt Gam, k'. K Q H (.r+li N `�.a..a 7$1# .m «s
j l
1 ! ti 'sir r t� 2 epl z t C t� {� � P +Of t 11.,.L gg -act 0 e _
i
tl 1
r
r.
+^t� _ i:,.+ �' :� Viz} ".fi. �•�.L� ,. V
to,1r` �� i G l (, 3.� t,..l C 1_ ...Y 13ry. .{. gs
B sK __ � f(
�` F t r
�-� r �a} ... F�€ !.sitees
_ a$Jo,000 and$20*0000
Cos
�� �.rr �., -Ween � o
� r !, is Y �' 4i +, r
l"- � . �� H ''a -J` � ,ar x
o r
t y
� ''hh (p'�r+' v ( r Y\T �vi
:. . `L..V T .. `
n.
projectedil n k' t a r landfill sit
The.
f
. p r c 25 to.have to
r e .,
ent site woula
�_
Ite In
developing this SThe
6 rig
, an >
--78)
co ended Action1974-m7566 "��
u dr r �r'
y
ends the regular replacement 01
T���p�x,+ ®@ ��q«. R"�' Pr F. '� +q z�a� Works 6ytl F - - ,
-111 site on a daily
•- the, sanitary
. � � `3 � �
ti,.. e
t replaced every,
�r=�Arep� r"
.bai.. �. .} � t e 197
6-77* Ithree ycars w I
71,E _ U -
i.
c
October 31, 1974
Page 7
R
«.q hwi
y I Liq
Ton 1 CK -UP (replacement) P r or49 Ly
The i rector proposes n regular replacement r r f the
�f
1 ion ick c( vadrd fleet contain two trucks,
which will be, ursedby the Director and the r The vehiclesfry
re recommended t be replaced c r i g to the fol1cwting schedule,
1s 7 � 1 1. Th trucks b t for
three year period the, rii 1 date. of purchase. The estimated
cost is $39,800t
Reconrwnded Action 1974-75p, (75-76)
2. One Ton 4 whael �
r
riveDuTp�ruck, (acement Y
r 1Pricrit
The . . . rector proposes :. regular replacement rgram of the
one Ton Dump Trucks. The recommended fleet of vehicles for the
Highway i i o i d contain two one tn dump trucks foci r wheal
drive with radio and snow plow, A new vehicleas purchased i
1974"75 arid a replacement hici is proposed for purchase in 1975�
76, and future replacements i 1 d 1980-,,81. The hicl s .
u1d be kept for a i d ot F ivie, years from the rigi 1 date f
purchase,, The trucks would be a minimum of 7,000 four
wi'Te, e d rove upw th radlo ind snov ow ma i pi The esti ted
cost of a repliaceii*,nt vehicle is
eco end d c t i l c cr 7 d 7 79)
a
3
t tC.V.W. ° c ,
P.W.The
`rector lie annual replacement
'Lon �_ trucks i i t tricks inmtnlmum
The®,� part {; $ j, .i }_ 'S `tea y�;,: �y'��gt � t .; -Division �would
a `+ J: i B �. &y f e iter v e � iq' `�J s �� h 's
h
contain - total ��1 � . « vehic1 s. T s is �° � Ir
contain 1 rai 1 1 r six r
rotating basis fr m tR �= ri i d ate of purchaseaThe anticipated�-
cost of -this vehicle is X22,000,
Recommended `� t i 1 �"$17,000t r -ir� 1 r{� 1 c t
program
4
. i nes' ffii ri t
Th inti t hb sig 1 r i c. e y Director h
rep
c :, i 9 i t' s r posed t - ie n i t, I a
Ancluding truck and tie ring apparatus De purchased,in 1973 the
corp i tt suggested putting the catchbas9 c i�g t r contract
The bids received showed that t ' srt � be done for between $3.20 andr:
$5.85 r basin, depending the number IV b sicleaned at one
t i mand the number of cleaningsper Iyear. si� r r. vr the
1,
,
D i rector feel s there r re grea ter of f i c i ens i s to be gained by having
Ir
w
the work, donewithin theDivision, thr gig I" ty control se t
s IrisP ct i r rots n the condition of existing c tchb i s4D o �
C-0 _..
October
31, 1974
e 8
g
.
,
,� cleaned
During h first six � 4 c1
_
ns[@r�� �{ry. pq y�p��$ �g '�(i ?y!•y��- �.}p ...ttt 7}!�"• sa® pk
�X F �.
per' o • w '.-Y � t a�i�i g "6 � � tl f+.* e �G � a 6A � � �Nrit're
unit
Within v P P c 8 `has . <a� o-, .�. � °r fJ ' r'
Recorafmendedl Action 1974-75*, 8 0 0- (75". -6)
"
�.n�'s"asa`�eg..c�.aNL+s.Rz��n�'..4+ .. •.�d'a+�% '.� .__.� ,,,�. _ - " �'.
K
s
gam, - � � ,y' � ��;-`} .�[3y-"�' �
sanders. 4 9 7 5 it v,.?S .- d o t h rel i year `o g,; � . r ' Y J� �� The
,y
$3t50%
Recommended Acti 1#,§74-,75;- � � 50 d-77) 76
Ar
`° actor Loader � Ptority
r
� r 6 4an der
�'Director recommends ds they replacement the ��
t t, 1975— aril the � 6 i na t o � der � 197040, �" re-
t,
f
E,
c i d n tory equipment i- p € c
I
tractor
contain twotractor ' der . The �� sl.1 cost � c� �
loader i
a 5 $0 , 00 (1975
r
r;
Sidewalk Ply`iority
hDirector �� �.���F �� �� � the additional i o u r { e � d 0
'+a�'
`iI 5.s Inver-toC, } t ly X' R � ®fit. �i !y %a� 4 Y- i F 0 %'nr �Y U Y � .n n s � Y ow � mova V � � the
Y €
purchase.ex
isting sidewalks necessitates the I
equipof this Cv
Aan
R e c orw-ie. in dA a d A C* It., 7 $ 13 0.00 (76* -77)
t;
�a
The D i rec tc,er recorwtends the. rep I ao (Amen t 5� 7 8*° of the 1965
Worthington Compressor at an e, t m
r..
Recommended Action `" 5*0 s500 (78-79)
C=d i t' ' Pr'ority aa A
H 12.h�
A'
The Director c ien 3 that the s i Garagei Highway e expanded
i i � . The i��r s addition ul r=o i ei�' 5 feet by
80 feet and wwould provided i t n i st-oragespecs. present sortie
equipment i stored outside on a yeari round basis.
R i i referredMunicipal
L i b_ra r�
y Renovation Proar,
Priority
Wkv
The Library Trustees have proposed a renovatlon program be initiated
In the Memporial Dui �dlncj t(,=,% improve the general appearances This
would be divided Into three staqa*s. The first includesithe refurbishing
of the q8tr) floor with car peto draperies. and new furnishings. No cos t
estirrete has been subm, I tted. The second stage Includes the refurbishing
of the .c..hildrens romi with carpet,, paint"nq
and additional furnish'ings.
There is Ev-a cost es -timate. for Ws work. The thlrd sLage Involves the
improvement of thes. entrance and vestibule with the tnstallation of new
doors and new lighting. t4o cost emte has been received for this.
Recoommnded Actlon 1974"75: $1000
2. Bookmobile Priority
The Bookmobile would Involve the PU-rchase of a vehicle which would be
utilized to serve several areas of the Town which the Library delivers
0
EV4-75: No request
6
Priority
The Library Trustee�,, recorm--siend the expansion
ha
lans
I -vc not brenerr prer
paed for
in 1978-79., P
cost estitrote was subMitted.
of the present f ac i I i t I A
t 'his expansion and no
I I
-75 Referred to Municipal Building Committee
Recowended Action 1974-i
-F. Recreation
Rfpaye Tennis Courts - Priority
Owl*
The Recreation Convission requests th-at. the tennis courts adjacent to the
"awad1 --76. The base of ing pool at Memorlal Park be reconstructed 'n 1975,
the courts is presently in poor condition and has settled considerably.
The construction would Involve the, installation of a levelling course t,,
1 the entire court wi-juld be repaved. The estimated
rove the depressions ant
cost is
Recommo.--,,,,,,,nded Action 19*,4s-75,b
ze ual:2.qe/Recreation Hall Prtority
(74,m75 not votedY
—v
•
Aw
October 31 1974
page 10
nd I e. �he the Rec rea t I on Depa r tmeMt a S
I I t o h a nal activi ties for
recreatin,
w C, a S P fe" C, V a f a(L I I lods of Incleaent wea-there
66iring per
the �,tjnwr recrentio
t VAHable- for Lhe use Of Municipa,
rea t i on hO, I vp� j S 60 f c -c, t by
*,>L1 I d a I srp be. a
The rec I d I nig
T'
, j of tfle bul
and civic qroup5o ,)v,-jJj,3b1e at thIs t1fret
120 f eet dc ta I ed cos t C's
Mlunir,�P&l aullding Comittee
Referred to
n. dei Actlwl 1974-,7`
mortal rivark. E a, r, t PHority
3
A -ak-the land adacent to
C
tc rej
M1 Ss On
side. The COn
r
and weste
a I rn� r� e t h f t 11 y I
h tie rflo r j tj t p r a r y f t L-, I I f i t y
1proflr poses to 4?
r park to additior,
�h
ct
a t MC010 nd to reconstrufac',
4 tc,� won, u I d wl so be used for
The, "-s I
oft�pajj and rmictice, 'tac; tion al softball
S, 11 as add I
- I- r 8s vf e
proposed caraq , and rec eatt
t h ef-via I jable, at thl s 1.itVe, Stjn�ate Is it
Hf) d
;,-.our t
f t I d s a n c It t � e n n ST
1 The- prel Im"narY estimate
t t 6 acqt-q I C.,� I ") is $25oOOOe
e for the tri n
r -ac,, jqtje,!� cons, uc t 10
tt-m) (exclusive
for site prePars
Action
Recowended
I Duel Priority
40 nRy�in L,and on UP re
h a $16,000 be appropriated over
t
n Conr i ,�on prop J t on the
The Recreatio deve-lop"Ient of facjl'tles
&,xt four to 5 1 A Yea r!� f or thc jly of a Small
the f1d.consist primar
4k C. r" wou
-n Land In Wc5-t f t11'r iient of
Rya fc)r the developr
FA ghborhoo
-6e � d
p I -,i y 9 r o- L; r i a r 6,,r' 6 � i- ;`�, � r-, ��, ''-- e the oce I nf;
C �
a d f 6 C t VC,,- r e�
Wj---it; voted)
R cotvm-oe r, d -e d Ak t ci,�4 00
o r y
aR e c" r" e a t", i 0 �1 Lj� 1�q
n Lhe j4oqn* Vista residential developmOnt
Lend has been -set. aSkJO-, v��,t rc-!Comends the
F - +,,; ---- hc Cor t t
,�! a i, - 0 zo
I ve recr , t pflrpoe.�C516 toto I C-0- t
ted t.
1 1,-h a e s t i MS
dr."Ve I opmen t of th a -C i
e of establish
11 -ed fat the p u r
'ds,
0,r e
T, and bal iff le"i
a IS C
p ayg round a res s We I
leww, 7 7 -7 1
Rcn,,commended A<AiC11
P r or t y
f I d Rec �-c-a t j orn La n,
Mans
a n d b d in Wea. st M
• k;55 ou If
U
:rt ona, a, Cwh' ct
f a n in c; r r
j A
f r) r t h e d e V f 'I c j, I t *Ikand cou I d b(
t 11,
Rcbmn,"to r * 8
comparable $',,,,yC- land
ConSCrV,L
M S
p u r c t M;-41
the, WL
t
qreenbelts thrtwt
a U �Ia towvj t teq� wj th an proposal
cq, 0 s eqested k
to �;�JPPIY t
was u
t A
The Recre
s f j el d a rea
th"n the
I Ua t i f S t t ees a I t:
jerlded Action iq-/4-754 ijo requestReccm
October f 19714
aP r I oi t7
4,
East r: e'.�
p -
n Lan
aar++�s7a. a-+..�: m�,.e.•s,.uz.=a.rasmx.'�.- _ '.a Tr.
�,� _ " �� z.+ 'E r '� 3�w i; r�`� f i o * SwF e� '%t:i'
In the Of
c d
�� .� a�ec re
r
�'
ha vim.. ��/ i given to the � ' - e %M-, 0 � rk �.
CT11ty has been
In In d u
si,iA� is
00de b%y the Recreat*on Ottaea that the need will ekAlst
to advise the CapitkIt sideration should lie
In
t such fact and t
g
.� � � ` '� '.. ri -� ; � dry F� � � B �: r �� �� �V
In East
i n for e r ograi-O nus � �
Mansfield.,
-
i
d d Action �f74-71-; uNo request
_ le -c, (Landfill Site) Priority
Add ions I e e pion `�°
F.
r
ti
� c
s for the Y i s i San i to i
I I shas been ,0r1v,)Jeted in Ja7q.,80 that Itthat- once the, existring facility
11ty, d
a or.. tinclude
equlatla di �orid
�
-cill des
Sod bt,5,p pjayq;round ftl
and othert d spoo t5 �� fi s cour601
d skating
a location for ,Anter sports w1h I r h Mcludes a sliding nil
T it i i i i within h
iron . in ae the completion O ���� _ Id be,,qiven
year �° OVe n consideration
sixth cted
74-75 w Mo request
Recor.monendeld Action 15
G. once `v , I on
im of 110,000 be approprIated
,, % to acqui re land
F,,, o n p ow f-
,�
-w n This f
�10U t y ta{
C
,. - become ps �' ie i p h i n
na � i e. the � � s Sl l to u ra. i � �.
a rea s,6
The 4 �
s o the4_ _� x G L tear jade
r(-i,(JUC.'1St5 3 th5isi r�o n e, Y a �
Wit
designated by the
n ua U)
RccoiTiiie n e d .a. ff o n ' n
Th
e, mm I s 6 � �
Pe from the 1a0d a
gg�t d r i i 4 .
r i \1 e r u t- h -, �,a r rn e C f a r s e
i
No estimate
1�
i �. ,�� ri d for the qu-Is tip^�
n, of
�
At- 1974 ae
- t m Mt F r f i nn .
t I ng
side of ets pond. The Tri -on
on��
Lm Sweet
used ors t' terly
tion ,rid conservation
noted �.. ���= r . for
purpr. t4ave i- c n cha �� d u require s a ri p i s
l rw
h as playground
the rd o be developed for active recreation ur s s,suc
M
and playfleldsit The Commission has a telitative agreeolent with the owner
i
October
Page
sHc
pond, where some 40 acres
of tile,Property 0111 theN.
-Ind' could be P
.
.
tional
$ h
A purposes*
e �Q _ teti d v N
u d
'C.. s t� 0 Jul
s k 6 y `� r" �r� i9.,+r:S !n .: i c Co.
The
_; F w `. '"r e t o . e, ��� 4
he c � s 10 ! F e-" J i 'n' �. `4' 4. ti I �..Y "i -I'_ � iv d k>., a�
.P Li
other lian
on
a I I' mon
along the Wad
-b e k n f r ow, i r ' WIC
ty4. 9 Y 1 b' 1.r c=n J _ i 'E�
r+ar3...
tto
ct � � bid I ;
near E �
ration this, s. �� � `� 'Jill a 5-
n�`
r
� '° ' a te
u I ton Pond
f�
the, #,.ons t, r uct I Otl
e'.
..litier,ovit _� y a p �'r r tiliscould i appropriated
n
tro
rti the �aco �e -e .. � _
eting votc,14 f
In * The
Coml s s
�� i n 1975,q, 16o _ t th I s g,� g. �}y
o I � requestth
t
Rn 6�� ,
Ca bo t
t-
.�d r
t
v
Pond Resuor;,�t
The � s o ri • y r_ ;
Tneering be t,
an article. at the 1976
E" . �" "' � � y F�.= rk y { ('11-1 n ^'` `fit. Pond,,,
# �
1` r'
Le
' w
I
Mee
no
or �1,000
$te a �C� Y. 9 6 1 1 j -7i "s a.�: -1 � r v � t> ��: 1 r 3 n U
1'he deve)OPPIWA Of this
�F :� `j
water n w � .. t
ea c (�f yjrmended Action 19P -75,
q
Res tora
s pond
1.�. SLF V h� I and os,: 6 c q 0t' The � , � �
nee be &-rrle 6r.
No e
D i I 10 r .>,
_ N
s
.� pig..
this
In ,� w rcc oqr nd,;� i cns the ..� � c� �
{Oils
b� rc6lc,�A an a roar basis* The fleet of
WOU
{Tha existing veh le
r, d v;o u 1, d be., replaced in 1976a,77 and 19`9InHHH
�r-. d cost of this verticle is $4,oco,
S=
4
}
tote ,
page 14
y�r ..;e. .� yqp [�[ y �Sl �p�.„g" J y�
,1 '� �..% 4 r 4 J � C) � 1 5 hTs �R f `w.k Lir i
b .. tl . '' H
A',•,,,e�,�z�.�,r�..ej�.�a>:r~a.�u.ers.t �:e� � s:��• ,n.:m=..�.u�..: �•{c5o�cvaa�cr � �:
C
h �; �? of -v i s aprons vo' c � �. � tile ° � �
ac o
.00S t
dowr
spaces
cE .
Thor-.- Lota I
h e :A Potr s. n, a �� � � ,I � �
t .e ka oR w � " tig b`t> 1 rl x t.. ��= F 4 a ble era l`4 funding
k� t"
t' S �? f_ i€(a .e:,& i � s _.r�.
Y 'r h e s t 11 ma 1C, en d r, ot T om n w o U be $5,600. This work
.�, �E 3. b..+ o +- before
'. 6 R theA 't F ' € r a S I mp e nv i i � '�.�' �3
c
E
r _n
Re, I oc a e Ry r 10 r
' ow..Swe�LS�•o.r-n--�.•-� - .vID��ffiStt.•R�F -
4 � 5, w � � ; fie: : or d. Trc-his
c,
� the to .gag :•
VIf r on I u r ac a t o a n d C- rf 5" U t- t h c.
I �� lar t why-iia �"���sen . 7. Any -i pr° ' ; �
beyond that t#'A the. d` r S S 9 ' o f e s rd � g
°, Y
equested at
I o
�9�y M g of i �
f
flajor Projects
t
'" ..
jor r�' � c` � (;-rcou t4j r ���=� abo �._l� for prod-�cs which d� ���,
,`Fk 'j`� 1 � _ �F,a
'�a S W r *S��rt :'f T'•t �^,. t: "P. j � At ! . . b. -
R.�..v
r,... re. a t to t t-,44 rf `� �4`',> � � ` d �� � � ;�� �.� � � n � �� � �� � ��
of t`. � E ` ` _ -,,izj vi.o t been a'r'c i . �. f ,
F f u ti d- Fe ii-!"/ Of projects Is dc
tj
„ gy
from
r f � Ole S �. e Fro r rn for cans .ry �acquisition
and r to H 19 hwa y T ids
' o � � Cx s : ; . �.:,� r s �-4#4h i c h s h oti I d b e C, 0.n 5 '1 d e r e. d 0 ve r
t
� e
f Lf r±-� 3,� d s b y the C a p t , �. � np ro ve .wp r f C iii e.
0"! Lr A-). r OV
ec ted Town t 4 e Lhe btu , stree't's i . �' v e i 'VFr.�' 9 � ✓ Irl p �6' on o
® 0d f ,.r- -veirfiera program In an account
or S dewa I k 1 ro V fl-cn
g �� r��:�ty
r oi, I
` ° ff: ocj ra r v i'fi or a �'�nu ro r is tom for the u-jnt re
;. t t € e
0 0 0
er,o imnend �m o 974 k � �, annus
rL-
" _ f � R Y d i.._ ra � � :l� fi � o-�
M
Lov ea an it, Pr"Ori tY
A
Pro 7ram was i n i ti rated i n 19714-75 f or the esti bi I shment of an
ude the
a nnua s t r ea n, Imprvmnt
oeeprogram. - ThiI requ I red
s wouldInc of
cleaning and dredg-ling in order to perift the free flow storm
water, as well as to 16W�t blockage ln�,,streams which creates
adverse and I t ions on ex I sting propertN
Recommended Action 1.974-7r,' $7,r-,00 (Annual
-i
Dral jn�p emt�..ntatlo'n
a
Plcn
Back -Bay Bron P r I o r t y
In 1973 $1�--),000 was -appt-soprinted for preparation, of plans for the
Back Bay Brook. There remains in an existing account $43,000 for
constructl6n -worke An engincering proposal has been received for
the cons O*uct ion plans fott- the sourtherly portion of the brook
f rom south
ing
of Eddy Street to ko,(.�urt Street. if this engineer
S tudy proposa I i s accep ted, and the work I s. compi eted, a recomiends
tion may be made to a future Town Meeting for the initiation of the
construction of the southerly portion of the Back Bay Brook. The
estimate for construction of the first phase is in excess of $1000000
Recorwrtended Action 1974-75& Non e
Lior r i r cts - P ri or i ty
.�
Additionai dri-ninage projects could be Ini tiated In accordance with
the Drainage Master Plan and possibly financed Orough a "'or bond
i ssue, As of th I s da te the priori ty f or dra I nage I mprovements has
not be -eh detailed,
Jewer
-ndeAction 1974-7,56. Nifine
Infiltration - Priority
Thi's program is for the sealing of existiong sewer lines to elimirate
the es t i s t 'I nq 9 round wa to r i of i I t ra t 'I on p rob I ertos f or s ubsequen t yetl I*s
Recotlimended Action 1974-75: None
P to Y
Sewer Extension r r i" t
This roram is a continuation of the program, initiated In 1972 for
the establishment of an annUal fund to cover the cost of small sesvier
I . . $10,000 (annual)
Reconimende'd Action )974-756
vr�
October 31,
Page 17
60
Th I
pre
I n
in
T'i n
of f
Pa t
7*
T f
T, c
th(
f 0
fo
We
T
t
h-1
D21 (�mer iorl ty
Sewer V�3ster Plan I �tcj t J on - Pr
s program is for the, 1FnpJCq,1e-,ntco,'on, of 'thC Sewer M ster Plan as
a E
pared by Camp, Dressierp HcKeea The major extension of the, Sewer
I I depc to extend such
es W1 !nd, upon the adoiAiOn Of PUblic P011cy
tension of the sewell
es as exis"ting development deror%tds, or the, ex
e for prc-ted developmert,,; Tkols pi can can have a long range
J all land use
ect on qajues, pop0,Fktion density a'nd the over
In the Town.
U Pro gin In 1975-76
o =iended Action 1974-75" Ject to bf
i onat Sewer Progra_�,i Priority Am
Reg i ona I Sewe r P rog rlai-i wl I I i nvo I ve the Towns of UWnfo f i e I Norton
Foxborough and w,,i re qui re equal partic9pation by each cod ununityo
sta te may permi t part Icipa it 100 f rom Indi vi dual communities provaided
re is a co * t (P- ,t t. I CS to be responsible
.qoit.ent by the tither twio comml(jni' in Mrd
theirfirvet)ncialcotriimitr�,ient wher, they tie into the SyStf!rfle,
0 steps w'11 be eequired:
this Ply
j
n to be nitlated ii foll-owl(19
Leg I s I; - woul d be the res ponsibi I i ty of the. Town
,ition for ttle easernent
of Mansfield to petit'tion the general cc
,)urt trj allow the T".n of
Ka ris f i e I d Lo acqtui re by em'' 1 nen t dopo. I n easements I n the Town Of Nor ton
Facliltie s plarvyling - a request would be made, at the 1975 Town �Ninoet
plant An'
lanning For the regic n I sewer treatment
for the ies P Ni"
$50t0006 wholch would be
r this planning would
e 5 t t G u r e; 0 rur, t o;n
iment dince the
0 Y e e
re I r,,,hu r up to OK A" r
1 begjWould Include the pre -
P ilt'ies p)an ng
rr, i n;a r y e s- 1 0 f the Wern and the necessary Ilede-ral application
'f'rt t h 5 Cowletion of th,s phase could be
and takes e-ipproY,',m-;iteY 5X F0 ote schedule.
by January, �9't76 It adheres to a r'gid
..X
Design State 31,ristjmii ng
be appropr;aUq_%d for the
T a
requeest would be made at
Jule I , 19770
cI
tacilitles plan, money would
approva, of the, pratton
detailed design of the planta This appro
the J�jjl() "'i -own Mep-ting and Complp
t,-Jotl wc)uld be
onstructl o"n would take two years and -hjz� plant could be. expected to be
C
In opeCtration by Janutary 1978#6
c iTop pHprave
ority when prograrp is fornuailly apd,
Acton 1574-75:
ter prolle-CL's
andConnv-,,c t'0tn,5 Priority
Q.
flis pro9l"P.M jnrJudj:!s lj water projects ivehich will be required to bring
ie system up t0 stan(l pr(.-iject Tw
t
ould include the insallation of
drants, valves nr-d the repf,�?,cinq of shorter lengths of older water lines
lid satall extensions of new m,:i1ins and the completion of required loops.
00
4 JD-re,00 (Annual)
-14-lorrmended Action 1 97 -75a $,
Water Main Extension Prolorl ty VJ
In reviewing the proposed projects for the next six year Period. it
was decided thn.t Whitron and Howard should r priority
re t I ng ba s ed UpOn the. rece n i n es ta a t f an of wa te r ma i (15 9 Wh i ch
for the
includes South Main Strects West. Street'� ' to Plain 1.5trect
t*,& in Well.
Witch Pond Well and the rEast t�insfteld connection to the Dust
The phasing of future projects may be adjusted after a review of the
plan.
Recommended Action 197-�-'
Well Exploration-
1975-76
W1 I low Street
$1101000
1975-76
Fruit & Short Sto
115vGOO
1975-76
East mansf ield
Loop
440,000* -
1975-76
Oaklands N* 'Maint
241toOO
Hi�lho West Church Central
19,77-78
Church Street
461,000*
19,78-79
Feeder rnains to
staraqe faciplitles -
352t8OO
197ge-80
School Street
1210000
it was recommended in the. Water W)ster Plan that a program be
initiated for the exploration of additional water supply. This
W06 ft , 0 ty to Jocate, sources of water in advance
uld enal-.)Ie the cotrwtlkfn�
of p roI a posed deve opmot,-n t an d I t wou I d a I so enb I e the, Town to have
a conTAetf,',, Inventory of future water supply,
'S %
Recorrmt--anded Action 1974-75: $30,000 (Bi-annuai;
t
water Main Cleailinci NI-iority
•
$75,000 (annual)
RecormmAnded Action 1974-75b 11
Well c1qaEjM.Pr22ram - P r I o r I t y
The Water Master Plan
e recr,,)mmends a program be initiated for thregular
4"75QRCnte Springs,
cleaning of the wellse The program is as folJOWS )97
1975-76--�!o. 4 akid No. 5 wells, No. 2 and No. 3 we e cleaned In 19T -3-74o
ili�4-"75: $259030 (75-76)
-A -F the Dustin Well projee-cte Monies ap%propriated
T r n mn I e i(1- e d a S. ,' e- r t u 11
October , 1974
Page 19
10. Great Woods LaneJ Prlorfty,
1 6 , eof t � � re; . Woo T iMeeting
+,65A fortheappropriatend $U
c.
rt�; Comple.ted ne(3 tu, t i n s on theseparcels a d r i c i i s
Ol
;ct 4 r gd T e - hosbeenassuredo r -O%
Sty, � i ori t s project. Tl st e t qui 4� . � �� by the
.:;i S to es%enti al t� i land the r i meter of the woods
as hey t*eel thot, land i s more for d 1 i-il.
Ccnmi '9 t tee w � I I r-(Lxr_mi-v,,cAnd i n 4 --he rear future that land In. the interior
~if the, s # c u ped i was t
= s er1y boundary in r I� �-C,?FK land r ig d for
cl qL1 i° i t 7)FI i n 17 57 6 s f o, r h e easterlyboundary to q the Rumford
'he estirr�ited cost of the acqu'slHon for 19751a-76 would be
�120,000, for whSxh the, Tovin would e rel mbursed '60,,000, r % of
S t of the '97"76 acquis't'on money,
Re c ari (annual)
1974-75* 10 0 0001
�.21.e. Pa rl.
sr h
c- i t the, project sa n' ta r`facilities to Ins -to i led n ncrdcr to
b estilirate has been
apeer t t �� � � � � ��c q � ins t � completed. c. ever,
If
d � p ro'rct i t b nc l d k Integral rt the the Me,
priogram, ther. money should be Appropriated to coWlete the
rof
AP' -b No recormi-eundation end
C v 00 1 S �ej
h School r oe l tee s �� the ��� �� r �� t �A c c�mthe s T. �� of
n ar'.1dition to the HI dd School, (nich wi 7, i house 20 to 24 classrooms, This
ouI d a l so a I I ovsfor the expens on of the ciaf eter to. and e construction of
Middle Sc tool #
School to 1200 sto .gin ,s. The Municipal Building Comittee presently has
$27,500which they intend t utilize for thearchitect rpreliminary
pl
oE O t e i i h proses of ev ieducational ans. The
tions w � � � red in conjunction 1 t the prel i m n r �•�►
-r-ox I wo t e1 y twe I v_ 1 2 weeksfor the a rch Iter.. t to a n s,, I t tc.t0k e s a p p t
c F s t b re v i d napp-roved by
_thei ss us t choo� bui Id! 4 Assistance Comi ss ion, This approval
-�ettnq for
could be expected in time to place an arttcle for the Annual Town tic
he preparation of the final work draviinqs. The estimated cost for t lie
p rep ai� :� rk �� m i n s Is rr. The intent of the School
our i t. tee and the MunWpal Building Cortriltt& Is to go Into a Special Town
tii i �� i s for t construction of this project.
T -ie appropriation would be based upon the bid price. If this schedule is
f l lc. d d, the. addition to the Middle School would be completed the mWla
f 19'77, whiI's Lhe target of the School Comittee and the Municipal
u I I d I nq C ranitt
tiN11i -L tee 6idt the �r�i�tir� that sapprovedi 1�/7,•
•
to
October "974
Page 2
tn I ec t s, Un a�
'nod for several projects which are
Informition sti It has 11"'o be obta'o.
under cons a.otri. "� � �� r - i s wee n submitted
rt ris erhowever,texists within the Town a need for
these projectc,,,, More definitive Inforrmition on them will be submitted
later of to i ng lists the projects,.
J
Dog Pound --
Sailing
r9 rom for Fulton Pond— i� J
..gat
Youth Cent �4&0-
C)o�
South Common I `� � �
MU