HomeMy WebLinkAboutMaster Plan Council 02/05/1987Date of meeting:
Members Present:
TOWN OF MANSFIELD
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING
February 5, 1987
Kelli Spedden
Doug Annino
Steven Chapman
Paul Folkman
Carl Nelson
Stuart Sweet
The meeting was called to order at 7:38 p.m.
Richard Callinan
Stephen Calvin
Joanne Colella
Larry Harrington
Ralph Seifert
Allen Willis
The minutes of the January 8th meeting, having been mailed to all
members for their review prior to this meeting, were not read. A
motion was made by Ms. Colella, seconded by Mr. Willis, and passed by
unanimous vote to accept them.
Correspondence
A letter was received from Richard Callinan regarding his resignation
as Planning Director for the Town of Mansfield, due to his
appointment as Planning Director in the Town of Bridgewater.
Ms. Spedden congratulated him on his new appointment and offered the
Council's regrets on his leaving.
Presentation by Linda Sohn, Chairwoman of the Water Protection
District Advisory Committee
Linda Sohn presented the Council with a brief review of the
formation of that Committee, an outline of its phases of operation,
and an overview of the main points made by guest speakers at their
meetings to date.
Ms. Sohn stated that at their first meeting the Committee decided that
due to the number of areas of concern that relate to water protection,
their first phase of operation would be to educate themselves by
inviting guest speakers with expertise in this field.
The first guest to speak was Steve Smith of SERPDD. SERPDD had
developed the layout of the current water protection districts, and
Mr. Smith explained that this was accomplished by determining the
average rainfall per year, less percentages for runoff and
evaporation, factoring in the town's average daily water consumption,
to arrive at a figure which is the area necessary around each aquifer
area to provide for this use. Mr. Smith also discussed sewer
expansion as a way to protect ground water, the problems of effluents
from septic systems, and the problem of runoff from pavement and
lawns.
TOWN OF MANSFIELD 2
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING - 2/5/87
Presentation by Linda Sohn, Chairwoman of the Water Protection
District Advisory Committee cont
Scott Leite, Health Agent in the Town of Mansfield, was the second
speaker before the Committee, and explained how septic systems work,
that it wasn't only the failed system that was a problem. He also
explained that some towns determine allowable lot sizes by the type of
soil, because of the way this affects the operation of the septic
system.
The third speaker was William Mackey of Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.,
the firm which designed the waste water treatment plant. He outlined
what areas had been sewered to date, and the planned phases of
expansion.
Lyn White of Easton, an Audubon Society speaker on water protection,
also addressed the Committee on how the actions of each town affect
the other in regard to water supply, and the possible need for joint
planning.
Ms. Sohn advised the Council that they will be having more speakers,
and that in March they will begin to work with the information they
have gathered and develop recommendations which will then be forwarded
to the Board of Selectmen and Planning Board, and then to the Council.
When questioned about the time frame, Ms. Sohn felt their
recommendations would be completed in May.
The Council and Ms. Sohn discussed the issues of IEP's involvement in
Easton and Mansfield and the need for joint action between Norton,
Mansfield, Foxboro and Easton in addressing water concerns, possible
sites for land aquisition for water protection, hazardous waste
disposal, problems of road salt, advantages of cluster development to
protect open spaces, and hearings for public input and education.
Old Business
Scientific Survey
Mr. Callinan updated the Council on the progress of the scientific
survey. To date, 75 surveys out of 300 had been returned and the
deadline for return had been passed. The Council was reminded that
the accuracy of this survey depends on a 100% response. He outlined
the possible ways to pursue this, which were 1) to send a follow-up
letter, 2) to try to contact individuals by phone (a brief experiment
in trying to ascertain phone numbers yielded only about 60%) or in
person, or 3) to depend on the results of the "informal" survey, of
which about 535 were received.
Although no vote was taken, the general feeling was that the
scientific survey was not worth pursuing. Council members discussed
using the 75 surveys returned in the scientific survey, the surveys
received in the informal survey, and having IEP, Inc., tabulate both.
TOWN OF MANSFIELD
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING - 2/5/87
Old Business (cont
Draft Results of Informal Survey
3
Each Council member who had tabulated results from the informal survey
outlined their findings. Although these findings will not be
viewed as conclusionary until IEP's final tabulation, some trends
seemed to be noted, as follows.
There seemed to be some common factors in Section I, General. Most
had more responses from males than females, most were homeowners, a
majority were not on fixed incomes, ages of those responding varied,
but responses were mostly from those over 30, the majority seemed to
be employed outside of Mansfield, and had chosen Mansfield because of
location, affordability, and tax rates.
In Section II, Future Directions, most seemed to feel that Mansfield
was a suburban community, that while they might be in favor of more
development of single family housing and light industry, they were not
in favor of more multi -family or condominium development. There did
appear to be interest in open space acquisition; and traffic and
protection of water supply appear to be viewed as problems.
In Section III, Growth Management, most indicated that residential
growth was too rapid, and commercial growth was about right, with some
feeling it was not fast enough.
In Section IV, Economy, there seemed to be some support for light
industry, medical facilities, and services, while there was feeling
against hotel/motels, bars, and fast food establishments.
In Section V, Open Space, most seem to support 1) preservation of
ground water recharge areas to ponds and to public water supplies,
2) and ponds, to be a priority; many seem willing to support the
acquisition/ preservation of these with property tax dollars. There
appears to be support for additional passive recreational and swimming
facilities and willingness to pay a fee for use of these.
In Section VI, Town Services, most seemed to feel town services were
good, with the fire department and police department rating highest.
These along with town water received top priority for more financial
support.
In Section VII, Traffic and Parking, not enough roads travelling
east/west, downtown parking, and poorly designed intersections
received the most mention. Some specific roads and intersections
mentioned were 106 at North Main, 106 at 140, and School at 140.
In Section VIII, there seems to be some support for subsidizing
housing for elderly and special needs, but not others. Most seemed to
be against multi -family housing, but may support "accessory
apartments". The Council discussed the possible problems involved
with interpreting these results because of the wording of the
question.
TOWN OF MANSFIELD 4
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING - 2/5/87
Draft Results of Informal Survey (cont)
In Section IX, Airport, while many have not used the facility, the
majority seem to see it as an asset.
In Section X, Downtown, parking and appearance seem to be improvements
those responding would like to see, and most seem to feel the Downtown
is important to Mansfield. It appears there is some mixed opinion on
where future business development should be concentrated.
In Section XI, Other, the most mentioned concerns appear to be the
dump, electric service, and ground water.
The Council discussed these preliminary results, and felt that
tabulation of these surveys by IEP, Inc., should be completed before
any conclusions are drawn.
Affordable Housing Study
In reviewing Connery Associates' Affordable Housing Study, Council
members discussed the need for affordable housing, and the increasing
average age of the population.
In discussion of whether members feel Connery is on the right track,
Mr. Harrington stated that the wishes of town residents should provide
direction for the Council; that that was why the survey was
undertaken, and its results will determine if the town wishes to
proceed in the manner that Connery is proposing. The need for public
hearings to clarify public wishes was also discussed, as the Council
is concerned about the wording of the survey question regarding
housing.
Participation of audience members in Connery's handout ranking housing
initiatives was discussed by the Council, with Mr. Willis
specifically stating that he wished his opposition to be recorded.
Discussion followed in regard to the importance of public input and
the importance of educating the public.
New Business
Council members discussed the proposed "Trash to Energy" incinerator
facility, and recent developments in regard to it. Ms. Spedden and
Mr. Harrington both had visited a similar facility in Oswego
County, New York, and offered their insights to the Council.
Mr. Harrington updated members on the reasons for the Board of
Selectmen's recommendation against this proposal. He explained that
they are opposed to the proposed site for the plant, that they are
concerned about potential traffic problems, possible water
contamination, and problems involving enforcement of regulations.
TOWN OF MANSFIELD
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING - 2/5/87
New Business (cont
5
Council members discussed the problems of waste disposal, the need to
close the current dump and the costs involved in closing it, expansion
of these types of plants, and the need for the Council be aware of
developments in this area.
At 11:00 PM Mr. Chapman made a motion to adjourn the meeting, which
was seconded by Mr. Harrington, and passed by unanimous vote.
Respectfully submitted,
Ltn-
Deborah Hillman, Secretary