Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning 06/29/1971MANSF I i:I.p PLANNING BDARD AGENDA June 0, 197a1 1. Call to order (7:30) 2. Clerks Report A. Minutes from meeting of June 21, 1571 9. Corraspondente 3. Warrant k, Visitors Agenda 1. Mrs Carol Thomas of Thomas ASsotiates and Mr. Wayne Torkington, Mr. Albert Chipelle of Community Affairs. S, bid Business Review Status of Plans b. Now Busihess Around the Table 7. Adjournment 10:00 PM MANSFIELD PLANNING BOARD MINUTES June 29, 1971 The Mansfield Planning Board met at the Town Office Building on Monday, June 29, 1971. Present: Chairman Wellington, Clerk Latham, Town Planner Maurer Planners: Mendes, Grant, Nelson, MacFarlane and Chavaree 1. Meeting called to order 7:30 PM 2. Motion: To dispense with the reading of the minutes of the previous meeting. (Mendes -Latham, all in favor) 3. Notice was read from the Zoning Board of Appeals concerning application of Christian and Schromm, Inc. 4. The following letters were read: From Town Planner Maurer to Board of Selectmen concerning Maple Street From Town Planner Maurer to E. Paul Zecher, Chairman, Board of Selectmen concernkng Weldor Realty Corp. - Relocation of Back Bay Brook. 5. Motion: To pay the warrant in the amount of $104.19 (Mendes -Latham, all in favor) 6. Board reviewed Form A plan of Christian and Schromm, Inc, for a lot located on School Street. Motion: To sign the Form A Plan of Christian & Schromm, Inc. (Mendes -Grant all in favor) 7. Board reviewed Form A Plan of Gale Realty Co, for three lots on Oak Street Motion: To sign the Form A Plan for Gale Realty Co. (Mendes-Chavaree, all in favor) 8. Board reviewed Form A Plan of Gale Realty for six lots on Ware Street Motion: To sign the form A Plan for Gale Realty Co. (Mendes -Latham, all in favor) 9. Board Reviewed Form A Plan of Mr. D'Annalfo. It was noted there were no Form A Applications attached. Plan will be returned. 10 Board Reviewed Form A Plan for Mr, lehan for a lot located on the corner of Copeland Drive and Creeden Street. Motion: To sign the Form A Plan for Mr. Lehan (Latham -MacFarlane, all in favor) - 2 - 11. 8:10 PM - Mrs. Carol Thomas of Thomas Associates, Mr. Albert Chipelle, Mr. Wayne Torkington and Mr. Coleman of the Department of Community Affairs met with the Board to discuss Mansfield "701" Planning Program. The Program was discussed in general terms. Mr. Torkington advised the Board that the scope of services as detailed was acceptable in general form, however, it might be necessary to revise it in terms of the number and type of maps and consolidation of elements. Town Planner Maurer will meet with Mrs. Thomas and a representative of D.C.A on Thursday, July 1, 1971 to'work out the details of the contract. 12. Board reviewed the Definitive Subdivision Plan for Gloria Estates on Ware Street. Town Planner Maurer advised the Board that he talked with Ralph Maloon and there is no problem with drainage. He also advised the Board that Mr. Willis had not yet met the Board of Health requirements and that the Plan should not be approved until he does. Motion: To reject Plan for Gloria Estates based upon the Board of Health rejection dated June 19, 1971 and that a registered letter be sent to the applicant with a copy to the Town Clerk informing him of the Boards action and indicate what has to be done in order to overcome this rejection. (Mendes -Latham, 5 in favor, Nelson opposed) 13. Board reviewed the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Guido Scarpellini on Oak Street. Town Planner Maurer suggested a Board meeting with members of .*,the Norton Planning Board since approval of one portion of the subdivision depends on approval of the other. _ Motion: To write a letter to Board of Health and Planning Board of Norton Inviting them to a joint meeting. (Mendes -Grant, all in favor) 14. The Board reviewed the Definitive Subdivision Plan entitled New Mansfield Estates on South Main Street. Town Planner Maurer advised the Board that he met with the DPW to discuss the Plan. They said the road layout is not the same as their plan which shows a 60 foot layout of South Main Street. The DPW will require a 50 foot curb radius at The South Main Street entrance. The DPW has to approve the curb cut onto South Main Street but will not..make a formal review until endorsed by the Planning Board, 15. ,The Board reviewed the plan for the Bertarelli Gravel Pit located off of Bi=rd Road and Maple Street. They will recommend to the Board of Appeals that the applicant comply with current standards. 16, .The Board reviewed the Highland Estates Definitive Plan submitted on June 23, 1971. It was noted that the following points were not included with the formal application: 1. The required Form B. Application 2. The address of the recorded owner was not shown 3. There was no reference to an intersecting Town Street 4. There was no notation showing granite monuments to be set 5. There was no topographic plan presented (The Board normally requires that a plan be submitted showing existing and proposed contours at two foot intervals. e -3- 6. There was no indication of the datum base 7. There was no typical street cross section indicated on the plan Motion: Send letter by registered mail rejecting the application and ask the applicant to come before the Board to discuss the intent of the develop- ment. 17. The Board reviewed the Hatch Act proposal for the Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Datsun site. Town Planner Maurer advised the Board, that the original intent of the plan only referred to the dredging of the muck and peat. However, he learned from the Department of Natural Resources that they are concerned with the amount of water that will flow from the site into Hodges Brook. The State has advised Cabot, Cabot & Forbes that they should meet the drainage requirements for the 50 year storm and that they will require Cabot, Cabot & Forbes to submit detailed calculations indicating the estimated amount of run-off. Mr. Leo Parente, Sr. and Mr. Leo Parente, Jr. were present during this discussion and expressed their objections to Cabot, Cabot i< Forbes developing the Datsun property because it would place additional water In the brook that my ultimately damage their property. Motion: Write letter to Cabot, Cabot B Forbes informing them that in our review of the Hatch Act Application we have become aware that what they are interested in is more than indicated when we originally met with them and that we would require more information, particularly water flows. Indicate in the letter:°that the Parente's have expressed their displeasure with the concept of putting any more water over their property and we would like to meet with them. (Mendes -Grant, all in favor) 18. Board reviewed a proposed plan by Waldor Relaty Corp. to fill in wet land within the Pine Needle Park Subdivision. This will come under the -.Hatch Act. 19. 'Motion: To sign release of lots on Darby Drive (Mendes-MacFariane, all in favor) 20. Motion: That the Board appoint the Town Planner to sign all Form A Plans subject to Board approval (Grant -Mendes, 4 opposed, 3 in favor) 21. Motion: To adjourn meeting (Chavaree-Mendes, all in favor) 10:48 PM