Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning 04/09/1986PLANNING BOARD'S MINUTES APRIL 91o,1986 Present: Chairperson Flynn, Clerk Quinn Planners: Gena-tossio, Boldrighini, Fiore, Madan and Annino Planning Director Callinan 1. Meeting called to,orAir at 7:30 P.M* 2. Discussion of the Growth Management Council/Plan I LO V V-1 I �7r Chairperson Flynn stated that at the,Town Meeting, John McNair, Selectman, informed her that the Board of Selectmen wanted to speak with a member of the Planning Board regarding the Strategic Planning Grant to make certain thatall the issues of the Planning Board were resolve-4,in order the - citizen -at -large , Gena citizen -at -large positions -can be filled for this council* Planner tossio stated -that in the minutes it was stated that there is -supposed -to, be two: committees and she would like t o know if this'.has -been '.1-1. set , r ann on f '-`the---'d6 mml tt ee s was- to answer- directly 6. t ly to the `Planning ing, :She -:stated- that e o Board-and-the--other,,c-ommittee-was to.answer to both thee Planning ----Board and the Board of Selectmen. P-lanningDirector -Callinan:stated-that he, ­does" -not see the need for -two'- (2), committees. because. the Growth: Management-, "Council ' can divide into separate subcommittees under its own vote; he feels -,that It is prematureto say, thdt,-two (2), committees are needed,-*'' Planner Genatossio pointed outthe - Planning Director*that the major concern of the Boardlwas- . -to that the Board of,Selectmen.and the.Planning Board would ,have equal--- author- ity over this committee although -the Planning Board is the authority of the update of =the Master 'Plan. Planner Annino stated that if the two (2) committees are separated, a' -lot, will be lost in the transition. Planner Genatossio was still concerned about whothiscommittee would answer to and Planning Director Callinan stated that the committee can answer directly to the Planning Board; he also stated. that he does not believe the Selectmen are as - interested in the authority as. they are in having the Master Plan updated. -Chairperson Flynn would like to know when the appointments for the citizen -at -large positions will be made* Planning Director Callinan stated that the deadline for receiving applications was today at 5:0O P.M He stated that the Board may wish to review these applications and interview these people before appointing them to the committee and that it is better to have one committee that has a comprehensive knowledge of the issues. The committee will be looking at other things, not just the housing aspect of the plan,,- Planner Genatossio would like to know who the consultant for the . update of this plan will be reporting to directly. Planning Director* Callinan stated that the consultant will report to,, -him, the only aspect the Town Manager will deal with is the approval of all contracts. The consultant will be presenting recommendations to the Growth Management Council and, in Planning Board's Minutes April 91 1986 Page 2 30 Board. ly presenting information to the Plannin,a some situations, direct g Planning Director Callinan stated that he does not agree that two (2) committees are needed and'he suggested that the Planning Board inform 7 - the Selectmen that all the issues are not settrd, regardingthis matter. L - The Planning Board agreed* 7:45 P,M.,--Discussion of Surplus Removal Permit, :-.-.'390'Oakland Street On March -31, 1986, the Planning Board .received -,a letter from Condyne, Inc* stating that they request a -permit for , t - he- --removal of 9,800 --cubic yards of 90: Oakland -Street At that time, the Board excess m4,tprial on the site at ­3 -. --`�-_- requested that the. applicant --of this,,, permit .- attend aBoard meeting to address any of the Board' -s concerns. . Jay, Graham,:Condyne Inc., was present at this meeting this evening and stated that he has'submitted a letter to --of operation, the proposed ours the Planning- Director which states .-the_- that the route and -the time span that this operation will occur. He stated times Of 'operation of 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.. were taken out of the Zoning_ 4h ' B law of the Town of Mansfield and the rou'te-x--ich -isstated will be taken wasgiven to him by the contractor on the s ilte.� The Board had a concern with the hours of this operation due to the fact that when this material will be leavi ng the site, there will still be school -children waiting for the buses and they feel this is a safety hazard, therefore, the. Board esta- blished the hours of operation to be from 9:00 P.M. until 2:00 P.M. The Board also had a concern with the route which t ' hese trucks would be travelling because although it is stated in the letter that the trucks will travel from Oakland Street to Franklin Street through Foxboro to',the Town of Easton, it waspointed out that the trucks -would- also have to travel on Maple Street and since Maple Street-is:a scenic: ­ ­_: road -the_ Board had concerns with trucks travelling , this route. Thereforeti` the. Boarddecided to establish the route to be from Oakland Street through-F0.kboro,,toFranklin Street to, Route 106 to Eastonwhich is theI inaI destination. was also -.pointed out 7 , by Plan'ner-Bo-ldrighini that the applicants .shou-ld,-be-1allowed ,to double the amount of loads leaving every hour due to the fact -that -the hours - of, oDeration -have- been. decreased. By doubling the. loads- leaving every hour, the P eriod of hauling this material will not be increased. Motion: To approve the excess removal permit for the site at 390 Oakland Street sending a letter to the Building Inspector which states that the hours of this operation shall be 9:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M.,, Monday through Friday; the appli- cants should be allowed to double the loads leaving the siteper hour as the hours of operation have been decreased; and the route which the trucks will travel shall be Oakland Street to Foxboro (Cocasset-Street) to-Franklin-Streetto Route 106 out to Easton (final destination). Copy to the applicant. (Boldrighini --Madan - All in favor) 4. Correspondence A copy of the Board's letter to Mrs. Judith F. Scott -9 Town Clerk, regarding the Board's votes on the zoning articles to be heard at the Special Town Meeting. A copy of the Planning Board's Agenda for April 9, 1986. --Planning Board's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 3 A copy of the Planning Board's pending business list. A copy of'a--- -,---letter--fromRichard J,. -,Callinan, Planning Director.,to Michae,l--B-.--.Loughlin; .--Vice President of Douglas A. King Builders Inc.'' regardingthe Board's vote to endorse -the costs of road improvements-. under Alternative No. 1" which would total $47,311.77 -and would--- nec- essitate an-_ addditional surety of $36,711.77 for the prolperylociated--_--- in the "Canoe River" Subdivisions A__-_ co of the Planning Board's letter to the Zoning -Board of-'-Appeal-s-­ regarding,the Board's recommendation on a variance,request--'-:for --,-Wilif-e. Winfred We Spencer. A copy of the Planning Board's letter to Mrs. Judith F. Scout, Town Clerk, regarding the Board's recommendation on Article,2 for' ".the -Spe-dial Town Meetings A copy of the Planning,-,Bbard's letter to Mrs. Judith F. Scott, Town Clerk, regarding the Board's recommendation on Article 23 for the Annual Town Meetings A copy of the Planning Board's let -ter 'to Mrs. Judith F. Scott,Town Clerk, regarding the Board's recommendation on Article 47 for the Annual Town Meeting. copy of the Planning Board's letterto Mrs. Judith F. Scott, -Town Clerk, regarding the Board's recommendation on Article 59 for the Annual -Town- Meeting A -copy of the Planning Board's letter to Mr. Paul J. Folkman,-President - ­-ny, - 0 of The Folkman Company, requesting Mrs Folkman-to attend Planning Board meeting to discuss -the matter of."Windcfii1me- Acres". A copy of the Planning Board's letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals.re- garding the Board's recommendation on the variance request of Jeffrey,J0. and Billie M. Sienna* A copy of the Planning Board's letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals re- garding the --Board's recommendation on the variance request of Gary and Brian Eagan. A copy of the Board's letter to Mr. Richard L. Spalding, Assistant Vice President of the Merchants Bank of Boston, stating that the Planning Board has approved the tri -party letter of agreement for the "Camelot at Mansfield" subdivision. A copy of the Planning Board's letter to Mrs. Judith F. Scott, Town Clerk, regarding the reconsideration of "Shamrock Heights" SubdivisionPlan. A=copy of the Planning Board's letter to John McNair, Chairman of the Mans- field Board of Selectmen, regarding a bill received from Gelerman and Cashman, Attorneys at Law, for the matter regarding Foxboro Terminals. A copy of the Planning Board's letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals re- garding the Board's recommendation on the -appeal from the decision of the Inspector of Buildings regarding a proposed truck terminal at 390 Oakland Street. Planning Board's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 4 A copy of the Planning Board's letter to Mrs. Judith F. Scott, Town Clerk, regarding the Board's denial of 'a,"Form___A" (ANR) plan submitted by the Cardox Corporation for land on.,Francis,Av-e A copy of a letter from Richard J. Callinan, Planning Director, to Mr. Henry A. Maurer, 8 Samoset Avenuep.---rega-raing the.proposed restaurant being constructed on-Samoset Avenue and Old,`-_CO­-1bny Way.-: 5e 8:00 P.M. Public Hearing ''Robyn Estates" Reconsideration The public hearing for the re I consideratl6h of the Planning Board's original s o-iw:-plan beganat $40 PM. The denial of the "Robyn Estates"�, �, "ubdivisi hearing was closed at 9:15 P.M. --A copy- ofthe-transcript is available in the Planning Department office.. The following people spoke at this public hearing: Elliott Fine Fine and Kravitz, 55,16onard Street, Foxboro James Grady Maple Street, Mansfield Carl Nelson 68 Spring Street Paula Pelaggi- - Franklin Street, Mansfield The following motions were made at this public hearing: Motion: To reconsider the Planning Board's original vote on the "Robyn Estates" subdivision plan. (Fiore -Annino - Flynn - Genatossio) (Boldrighini -_ ,Quinn ,opposed_t6i`-,this motion) (Planner Madan abstained from -voting) Motion: To approve the plan for the "Robyn.Estates" definitive sub- division, (Fiore - Genatossio - Flynn - Ann no). (Quinn - Boldrighini opposed -to this motion) (Planner Madan abstained from voting) 6. 9*015 P.M. - Public Hearing - Subdivision Regulation Revisions The public hearing for the Subdivision Regulation Revisions began at 9:15 P,M. At 10:07 P.M., the public lic hear'ling was continued until Wednesday, April 16, 1986. A copy of the transcript is available at the Planning Department office, The following people spoke at this public hearing: Joseph Zeneski - 842 East Street, Mansfield Carl Nelson 68 Spring Street, Mansfield Karl Clemmey 750 South Main Street, Mansfield The following motions were made at this public hearing: Motion: To amend Section III. Be as stated in the revisions. (Quinn - Annino - All in favor) Planning Board's Minutes April 99 1986 Page 5 Motion: To amend Section IV. A. 1. as stated in the revisions and words "see Section II- def inition of vehicle by adding the __- day"after the words "300 vehicle trips per day. trips per_ ( Boldrig hini - Quinn - All in favor) Motion: To amend Section IV. A, 2 as stated ---in the revisions (Genatossio - Annino All in favor) *Planner Bo g ldri hini left the meeting at this points _ Motion:_Jo Jo amend Section IV. Be 1. 'as stated in the . revisions, (Fiore - Annino - All in favor)' Motion. Toamend Section V. Be 3. as stated in the revisions. ... (Quinn - Annino - All in favor) • T -6 --amend Section- V -,----B, 1. as stated in the revisions, Motion. To ame .- . (Qu inn - Annino - All in____f av o r ) Motion. To amend Section V. Be le. as stated in the revisions. (Quinn Annino - All in favor) Section V. Belf. as state Motion. To amend. d in the revisions. . (QuinnAnnino - All in -favor ) Motion. To amend the Standard,Cross-Section, Schedule A and B, as stated in the revisions, uinn Fiore All in favor) - =- nin Article for -the the Annual Town Meet*n 7. Discussion of Zo ... _ Planner Genatossio: asked'if-Planning Director Callinan had looked at the buffer areas Planning Director Callinan stated zoning article for the . that the t he has spoken with the Town of Foxboro and found that y have a 25 foot buffer requirement for theno industrial areas abutting residential ;areas. He stated that he has p roble.m with this 25 foot buffer requirement ... definitely needed. Planner Genatossio stated that she because a buffer is y Nether the wanted to make an g thou ht that the Board was goin amendment to the article to look at whether y rticle on requiring certain things within the buffer rather than an amount of 200 feet. She suggested that a statement be put n this article at the 'cle which states that certain items could be required • Planning -Board. Board. Planner Fiore pointed out o the discretion of the g Board that -i-f- this s P statement is laced in -the article, the applicants will s expected not know what ix ected of them when they start designing the site plans - to bring fore t g he Planning Board; he felt that a certain amount of feet be - should be stated and then a statement can be put in that says certain things .. can be required at the discretion of the Planning Board. Planning Director ed that a 50 foot buffer be required in addition to the Callinan recommend - side • _and rear yard setbacks and within the front yard setbacks. Clerk Quinn • Board that he wou=ld like a statement put in this article pointed out to the _ • land that is currently existing should be exempt from this stating that any regulation. The Board pointed out to Clerk Quinn that this is not necessary since all that would be required if these businesses wanted to expand would be a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, not a variance. Planner he feels that a buffer requirement of 50 f eet should be re - Madan stated that -- is putting trees or a fence up, and 25 feet should be quired if the applicant p g Planning Board's Minutes April 99 1986 Page 6 required if the applicant is going to erect an earthen berm* He stated that the __ Board should consider the smaller industrial parcels in Town when the-' take this article to the Town Meeting. Planner Genatos, - s4o stated y that the buffer area should be 50 feet and then depending -,on what ----is pro- posed-fo-r the site and what the site abuts, certain items within the buffer area shall be required. Planning Director Callinan stated that it.'should be studied further in order that the Board can be sure that they can --require this. Planner Annino stated that a statement should be placed in this ar- ticle which states that the buffer area shall contain an earthen berm of at least six (6) feet in height and/or a solid fence,of equal height,- with densely planted evergreen trees, plants and flowering*shrubs. It -should be stated that the plan shall be stamped by a.regis'tered I landscape --.architect and approved by the Mansfield Planning Board. Planner Fiore stated that .the article should also read that no earthen berm or f ence- shall be placed with- in the fr - ont yard. Planning Director Callinan stated that the article should also read that the maintenance shall be the responsibility of the -land owner including the replacement of the items over a.period of time. Clerk Quinn stated that the statement that no main buildings,.accessory buildings, Pg area, storage area, driveway, railway or roadway shall be permitted within the buffer shall be added to the article. Motion: To amend the article for the amendment to Section IV. Intensity Regulations to state that the buffer shall measure 50 feet in width in addition to the side yard and rear yard setbacks and within the front yard setback. The buffer shall consist of an earthen berm of at least six (6) feet in height and/or a solid fence of equal height, with densely planted evergreen trees, plants and flowering shrubs. The plan shall be stamped by a --registered lands -cape architect and approved by the Mansfield PlanningBoard0-No earthen berm or fence shall be placed within the front yard. If the zone boundary line is along a street, the buffer'shall be measured from the lotjine. The maintenance of all items within the buffer shall be the responsibility of the land owner which includes the replacement of certain i ' tems over time.No main buildings, accessory buildings, parking areas, storage areas, driveway, railway or roadway - shall be permitted withinthe buffer. (Quinn - Annino - Genatossio - Flynn - Fiore) (Planner Madan was opposed to this motion) PASSES Motion: To add the statement to this at the time this amendment is exempt from this regulation. (Quinn - Annino SECONDED FOR (Madan - Annino - Genatossio FAILS amendment that any existing buildings incorporated shall be deemed as DISCUSSION PURPOSES) - Flynn - Fiore opposed to this motion) 60,000 Square Foot Lots within the Water Supply Protection District - Planning Board's Article Motion: To accept htis article to be heard at the Annual Town Meeting* (Annino - Genatossio - Fiore - Quinn - Flynn) (Planner Madan was opposed to this motion) PASSES The Board had a concern as to if this article was going to be brought up at the same time as the Selectmen's article for 60,000 square foot lots -and Planning Director Callinan informed the Board that as far as he knows it will be brought up at the same time. Planning Board's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 7 60% Lot Coverage Article - Planning Board Planner Genatoss I io stated that the Board, -,must look at the homes and busi- nesses in Town and not just the industrial uses because this article will effect all these uses. Planner Fiore. stated that he is concerned that 60% lot coverage�.for industrial may be too low. Planning Director Callinan pointed out to the Board that this article does not affect the P ercentage of lot coverage, it affects the definition of lot coverage and, therefore, the percentages cannot -be changed because then the whole scope of the article will be changed. Planner Madan stated that this should.be amended sq,that the percentage of lot coverage can be included in this article. Planner Fiore stated that this -,-.article has to be looked at further. Motion: To withdraw the articlee-for the definition of the lot coverage from the warrantf,o"r the Annual Town Meeting. (Madan - Annino - Fiore - Quinn) (Genatossio, - Flynn opposed to this motion) PASSES Frontaon Route 106 - Planning Board's Article - S ecial Town Meeti Motion: To accept this article as stated on the warrant for the Special Town Meeting* (Quinn Annino - All in favor) Zoning_Article Rezone from Agricultural to General Business Land on Route 106 - Sponsored by Karl Clemmey Motion: To sponsor this article as statedonthe warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. (Quinn - Annino - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES) (All opposed to this motion), FAILS Planner Annino asked what the' last Master Plan suggested in this particula'r area because he sees possible problems in this area. Planning Director Callinan stated that he doe's not recommend that this area be rezoned to "General Business". Clerk Quinn would like to know that since there are approved subdivisions in this area, if it would be futile to have this land rezoned to "General Business". Planning Director Callinan stated that it is not futile because the owners of the land will be able to either put. residences or a "General Business" use in this area. Motion: To recommend against this article as stated on the warrant for the Annual Town Meeting* (Quinn - Madan - All in f avor) PASSES zonin- Article Rezone from S c ia1 Business to General Business Land g _p on Route 140 - S onsored by Karl Clemmey Motion: To recommend against this article as stated on the warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. (Genatossio - Annino - All in favor) --Planning Boardis Minutes April 99 1986 Page 8 to "Special Business" o stated that this land was rezoned Planner Genatossi approximately five (5) to seven (7) years,_ago; she stated that "Special Business" gives the Planning Board the opportunity to review what would be going on that site because it would require a Special Permit and she feels that this gives the Planning Boar&:mpre control over the uses in that area* Chairperson Flynn stated that she feels it is important to keep this --Madan would like to know what area zoned as "Specia-l-Business". Planner, will not be allowed, in the "Special -Bu , sinessit district, that, is � allowed in the "General Business" districts Planner Genatossio stated that more uses are allowed in the "Special Business" district than the "General Business" district,, but all that 'is- required is a Special Permit and a public hearing from the Planning Boards Planned Residential Develo went Zoning B law Article. --Sponsored by Edward Broderick Motion:- To send a negative recommendation to this article as stated on the warrant for the Annual Town Meeting s (Genatossio - Quinn -SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION) Planner Annino would like to know if the Planning,Board could make an amend- ment to this article which states that only that particular parcel shall be designated as a Planned Residential Developments Planning Director Callinan stated that this cannot be done because it would be spot zonings However, I Planned Residential Developments can be limited to a twelve (12) month period and, therefore, this would limit the effectiveness. Chairperson, Flynn stated that she is concerned because there is no Master Plan to refer -to; she also .stated that.,she'feels .-that-��the nn --Plaing--Board should writethisarticle if it should "go'"'to the Town ` Meet - ing.-- Planner Annino stated that this typed of development is worth a try rather than have all the land developed conve'n- tionally. Planner Fiore stated that this gives thee-To-wn another vehic.le*to- develop the land with . iii --the Town. Planner Genatosslilo 0 stated that she has a problem ,with this article because it includes all agricultural areas. Planner An pointed out to, the Board that if this article is. denied, � then- the Town will be losing a lot - of valuable resources compared to what can be gained if this is passed. Planner Fiore stated that this will help the water in this area. FINAL VOTE: (Genatossio and Flynn in favor of the recommendation) (Quinn - Fiore - Madan - Annino opposed to this motion) FAILS -Planner-Annino stated that this development will limit the impact on the services of the Town and it is excellent for the Water Supply Protection Districts Clerk Quinn stated that he is of the opinion that the Board can P rotect the Town by having tight.rules and regulations; he would like to know if the Planning Board can require the units within the development to be spread out. He stated that if the Board can require certain things, he. believes that it should be able to be controlled. Planner Annino stated that a time limit from the datelthe article is voted on should be placed in this article. Planning -Director Callinan -stated that he will check with Town Counsel on this matter as well as to determine what the definition for a bedroom is. Clerk Quinn stated that he would like a rough list of regula- tions which can be presented to the voters at the Town Meeting in order that they can be made aware of what the Planning Board is requiring for the Special Permits Planning Board's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 9 Motion: To send a favorable recommendation to Town Meeting on this article adding the amendment that it shall be effective for twelve .(12) months from the date of the vote subject to Town Counsel's opinion. (Quinn - Fiore - Annino - Madan) (Genatoss`io - Flynn opposed to this motion) PASSES *Planner Genatosso left the meeting at this point. 8. "Form A", (ANR) Plans Hatheway and Patterson County Street The applicant of this "Form A" (ANR) plan is Hatheway and Patterson Co. Inc. This "Form A (ANR) plan consists of land situated in the Town of Mansfield bordered northeasterly by County Street; southeasterly by Clem'mey; southwesterly by Kountze, backwash of Rumford River, Rumford River and Spencer; northwesterly by Mansf field -Foxboro town line; .the land is zoned industrial. The reason this plan does not constitute a subdivision is because the plan affects a consolidation of eight par- cels of land. The checklist is incomplete; items number 1, number 6, number 10 and number 11 are not completed. The Planning Director also noted that the plan is not sealed and signed by a professional registered land surveyor. Motion: To deny the "Form A" (ANR) plan for Hatheway and Patterson Co. Inc. for land on County -Street due -to the reasons which are not completed on the. checklist and -the Planning Director's note regarding the plan not being signed and sealed by 'a pro- fessional registered land surveyor. (Fiore - Annino - All in favor) Lucido and Dei - Stearns Avenue The applicants of this "Form A" (ANR) plan are Lucido and Dei. This "Form A" (ANR) plan consists of a parcel of land on the northerly side of Stearns Avenue bounded northerly by Tanya Drive; easterly by Fallon and Dei; southerly by Stearns Avenue; westerly by Carine and Christianson. The reason this plan does not constitute a subdivision is because the lots individually are not to be construed as buildable lots until proper frontage transfers of ownership have taken place. The checklist is com- plete. Motion: To approve the "Form A" (ANR) plan for Lucido and Dei for land on Stearns Avenue. (Madan - Annino - All in favor) Cardox - Francis Avenue The applicant of this "Form A" (ANR) plan is Cardox Corporation. This "Form A" (ANR) plan consists of land located southeast of the bend in Francis Avenue. The property use to be shared with Franklin Warehouse Distributing. Area to be leased is a gravel, level parking area. The reason this plan does not constitute a subdivision is because the land remains under one owner. Only lease use of one portion. The checklist is complete. Motion: To approve the "Form A" (ANR) plan for the Cardox Corporation for land on Francis Avenue. (Fiore - Madan - All in favor) ,-Planning Board's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 9 Ispo USA Inc. Branch Street The applicant of this "Form A" (ANR) plan is Ispo USA Inc. This "Form A" (ANR) plan consists of Lot 8 - A parcel of land on the northerly side of Branch Street bounded northelry by Piaseki and Ferrara; easterly by Compo; southerly -Z -by Brnach Street and westerly by -Branch Street,, Lot l00__�" A parcel of -land on the southerly side of Branch Street, bounded easterly and southerly by Compo; westerly by the Town and northerly by BranChl-Street. The reason this plan does not constitute a subdivision is because -the lots have sufficient area and frontage as per zoning. The checklist is --complete* Motion: ,To approve the "Form A" (ANR) plan for Ispo USA Inc. for land. on Branch Street. (Fiore - Madan - All in favor) Caponigro - Gilbert Street The applicant of this "Form A" (ANR) plan is Eileen Caponigro. This "Form A" (ANR) plan consist's"of a parcel of land on the easterly side -of -Gilbert Street bounded northerly by the Walmark Corporation; easterly by the Walmark Corporation; southerly by Knight and westerly by Gilbert Street, The reason this,plan does not constitute a subdivision is because the lots have suffi- cient area and frontage as per zoning. The checklist is complete Motion: To approve the "Form A" (ANR) plan for Eileen Caponigro for land on Gilbert Street. (Madan - Annino - All in favor) Vadala - East Street The applicant of this "Form A" (ANR) plan is James V. Vadala, Jr., Necco Realty Corporation. This "Form A" (ANR) plan consists of 31.4 acres of land situated on the -northerly side of East Street and is approximately 1500 feet northwest of the intersection.of North Street and East Street. The reason this plan does not constitute a subdivision is because all the lots have the required frontage of 120 feet minimum and the required area of 30,000 square feet minimum and are on.a public way. The checklist is complete. Motion: To approve the "Form A" (ANR) Plan for James V. Vadala, Jr., Necco Realty Corporation, for land on East Street, (Fiore - Madan - All in favor) 9. Around the Table No comments at this time, 10. Public Discussion Nelia Phillips, 285 Hope Street, asked the begin removing their surplus material from her that as soon as the Building Inspector can begin -to remove material. The Board a -that Condyne will be allowed to remove two but that the trucks cannot leave the site minutes apart. Ms. Phillips also asked th has been tested because of the Chemical P1 to the site. Chairperson.Flynn informed her when Condyne was going to their site. The Board informed issues them their -permit, they lso pointed out to Ms. Phillips (2) trucks an hour from the site, more frequently than three (3) e Board if the soil on this' site ant which is in close proximity that she should speak to the Board of Health or the Selectmen on this matter. PI-eningBoard's Minutes April 9, 1986 Page 10 - Karl Clemmey, 750 South Main Street, stated that -he takes offense when a Board member makes a statement and will not let him respond to this state- ment an d then - leaves before the end of the meeting so that he can not re- -s e -spond to that statement when it is time for publ I Ic discussion* He stated that he will now have to address this matter at the Town Meeting. Mr. Clemmey stated that he would like the Planning Board to look at the Bylaw and read what is allowed under "Special Business" and what is allowed under "General Business". He stated that many more uses are allowed under "Special Business" than "General Business", he feels that it would be better for the Town if the area which he is proposing for "General Business" (Route 140), be rezoned to "General *Business- He also- stated that he doe -s not feel that it is fair to him as a businessman -that every proposal he brings before the Board receives a negative recommendationo 11. Date of Next Meeting is Wednesday, April 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Hall. 12, Meeting adjourned at 11:50 P.M. /JA __I CLEAK DATE