HomeMy WebLinkAboutMBC 06/28/1988Town of Mansfield
Town Offices: Mansfield, Masm*huseffs82O4
Minutes of meeting 6/28/80
Presentx W. Verzola, S. MacCaffrie, G. Antonuccio
G. Cauldwell, D. Amsden, J. Corliss
Absent: F. Guardabascio
Attendees: G. Farugia (CUA), J. Epstein, W. Raines(Design
Partnership), D. Fisher(Larson Assoc), J. Russell, M.
Russell (Minuteman Engineering)
Meeting called to order at 7:45 pm
Correspondance to and from read
General items of discussions J. Corliss responded as to
what is status of work progress and dust control. C.
Cau1dwell questioned the fill materials and wet areas
usage.
W. Vsrzola spoke as to his monitoring of the gravel in the
fill`wet areas at the 1 footmark and indicates that the
contractor has used the correct materials and that the
work was also tested by American Engineering during
installation, `
`
There was discussion as to persons on the site and their
representing the respective agencies t the meetings and
that they are also representing the MDC as their
designated representatives at the site meetings"C°
Cauldwell motioned that a letter be sent to all parties
and their respective committees as to the fact that the
site is restricted to work personell and that they are not
to be on sitewith out permission of the contractor and
escorted by either the contractu or the Clerk of Works"
All persons visiting the site will check in with the Clerk
or Contractor" Seconded by U Corliss VOTED 6~0
to
W. Raines reviewed the pro of the work and indicated
that work had substantial1Yl�ver the past two weeks"
Reviewed three proposals for added work to date( trap rockv
/
{
relocated garage, unsuitable materials) They were given to
the Architect for his review and comment prior to formal
presentation to the committee for change order process"
Discussion on the survey discrepancy from the Carol Johnson
'
`
oUrVoy which Won thm information Umod to proparm the)
r
� contract documents for the Library/COA. It was noted by S.
MacCaffrie that had the MBC chose to re -survey the
property the costs would have been in excess of $20,000
and delayed the project start by more than three months"
It is basic that the changes in work due to the survey �
discrepancy will be less than the initial cost and has
been further reduced by changes in grading to accomadate
the in-situ information"
�Reviewed Requisition
� to the lack of proper
it was motioned by J.
to approve $92,150 as
compromise"
# 2 and after much discussion and due
back up data/breakdown and schedule
Corliss and seconded by C. Cauldwell
reccomended by the Architect as a
It is noted that there will be no further payments approved
��
wit.*r�he approved breakdown and proper flow chart as
previously requested and samples that were forwarded"
The committee moved to direct the Architect to have the
Contractor contol the dust and maintain the dirt on the
street in accordance with the contract documents and local
ordinances.
Motion to proceed with changes as per R1 dated 6/20/88 to
resolve Carol Johnson Survey discrepancies by D. Amsden
seconded by J. Corliss, VOTED 6-0
Minuteman was directed to provide costs for review by the
Architect as soon as possible"
It is noted that Larson Associates should be commended for
the quick response to the grading situation and providing
the necesary documents"
July 12, 1988 7:30 pm will be scheduled as the next
meeting.