HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation Minutes 8/4/1986MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE ONE
Members Present: Chairman Sweet, Commissioners Graham, Mandell, O'Neill,
Ouellette
The meeting was called to order at 7:38. Candidates for the Conservation
Agent position were interviewed. All candidates were told that the position
would be up to 20 hours per week, including meeting time; that the Commission
wanted an agent who would be available to the public and to town officials at
regularly scheduled times; that the salary was set by town meeting at $9750;
that neither health insurance nor pension plan were available for a half -time
position; and that mileage would be reimbursed at $.20 /miles In addition,
the Commissioners expressed their hope that the town would soon vote to fund
the position full time. Commissioner Ouellette also noted that the joint
meeting with the Selectmen, Planning Board, and Board of Health had brought
forth a suggestion that the Conservation Agent position might be combined with
a zoning inspection position, to create a full time position.
TNTERVIEWS
Richard Lewis
Mr. Lewis was first to be interviewed. He expressed interest in the
current relationship between the planning /building /health agents. The
Commissioners expressed their hope that having an agent located in Town Hall
would promote better coordination among all departments with the Commission.
Mr. Lewis has no problems with working into a full time position. He has
written grant proposals, and is currently looking at opportunities in
consulting and other part time organizations. He has experience working for
non - profit organizations. He feels strong in the educational aspects of the
position, and doesn't shy away from "battle" either. He feels competent to
handle town meeting presentations and has no problem working with cable tv.
His experience at reading blueprints and his map skills are limited; he has
done some coursework which involved identification of vegetation.
Maurice Hall
Mr. Hall began by asking whether there was a set protocol for transmitting
information between departments. The Commissioner reiterated its position
about the value of the liaison role of the Conservation Agent. They explained
that they are also eager to fund someone who can search for funds. In
answering a question about why Mr. Hall desired this position, he explained
that conservation is the direction in which his interests are headed, despite
a strong research background and experience with pollution control. Noting
the emphasis on marine areas detailed in Mr. Hall's resume, Commissioners
wondered why Mansfield interested him. Mr. Hall noted that his concern is for
ecosystems, as an ecologist; he also mentioned that he has had hiking and
fresh water systems experience. He has had courses in botany, though his
familiarity with the wetlands laws is not current. He has no problems with
working full time eventually. He likes detail, and considers it important to
this position. He has familiarity with maps and surveys, and has experience
in writing grant proposals, though he claims no expertise. Writing for the
public is acceptable as a minor part of the job, but not as a major
component. With regard to cable tv or town meeting presentations, it would be
acceptable if he felt that he were the one most qualified to do it. Mr.
Hall's questions were on the nature of any water pollution problems in town,
landbank programs, inventory of resources, and relationships between
developers and the Commission.
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMUMISSION
MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 1986
CORRESPONDENCE
MINUTES
PAGE TWO
The next candidate, Mr. Levenson, call to cancel his interview due to
illness; at this point, the Commission went on to review correspondence until
the next candidate's appointment.
MOTION: To approve payment to secretary for 40 hours from July 7 to August 3.
(Grant - Mandell; all in favor) VOTED
Mark Audet, Bird Road
Mr. Audet, whose hearing continuation had been scheduled for 7 :35, did not
show up. Commissioners discussed the best action to take.
MOTION: To issue an Enforcement Order including the following
stipulations: 1) removal of septic disposal system; 2) removal
of fill from wetlands and restoration of wetlands to previous,
original condition, and 3) appearance before the Commission to
indicate how and when such removal /restoration shall take place
and to seek approval for such plans.
(MANDELL - O'NEILL; all in favor) VOTED
INTERVIEWS
Jennifer Graf
Ms. Jennifer Graf was the next candidate to be interviewed. She requested
additional information about what the job would entail, as well as whether she
would have supervision and guidance. She has familiarity with the Wetlands
Protection Act, and knows the fine lines about wetlands. She hopes the job
will eventually work into full time. She has studied zoning and town planning
and finds a zoning inspection position compatible with being Conservation
Agent. She has experience from her botany classes in mapping skills; has
strong coursework in forestry; has no grant proposal experience; doesn't like
writing much but does it well.
Joseph Hall
Mr. Hall has the advantage of knowing the area well, as a result of his
having worked on the forest inventory project for the town. He doesn't feel
that he is very familiar with the wetlands laws and regulations, though he has
done some mapping of wetlands and has courses about it; he has some experience
in reading blueprints. Combining this position with a zoning inspection
position would present no problem. He feels that he is "not a strong speaker
but could get the message across." He has no grant proposal writing
experience.
Mr. Richard Phillips, who was to be interviewed this evening, was not
available at the time of his interview; he will be contacted at a later date.
WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING - File SE211 - 168
Broderick Corporation
Plymouth Street and King Arthur Way
The hearing re- opened at 10 :27. Mr. Broderick presented additional
information on the following points:
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE THREE
1. Contour lines in the sewer area are shown on plans with a revision
date of July 28.
2. Flood plain elevations relative to the manhole rim elevations are
shown on a map of the plain, with the sewer route scaled on; a second
map shows this on a larger scale.
3. The sewer manhole plan shows manholes with a note regarding butyl
seals, exterior bituminous coating, and exterior bricking sealing.
The unit comes pre -cast; the drawing includes construction details.
The whole assembly will be pressure- tested by the town.
4. Hodge's Brook is shown on a revised plan; it was originally shown as a
depression, but not as Hodge's Brook. In addition, the detail for its
crossing and the order in which the work will be done is shown; it
will be pumped during work to prevent any overflow.
5. With regard to access for maintenance, Mr. Broderick has requested
permission to place funds in a gift account (per the letter sent by
Mr. Broderick to the town engineer, a copy of which has been received
by the Commission) to rent equipment sensitive to wetlands, rather
than build an access road, in the event of a maintenance condition.
The Town Engineer has written a letter to the Town Manager regarding
permission for this fund; no copy was sent to the Commission, but Mr.
Broderick will forward a copy to the Commssion. It was noted that a
copy of this letter should also be forwarded to DEQE. Mr. Broderick's
revised plans have been submitted to DEQE.
Commissioner Ouellette asked Mr. Broderick whether upland routes which
would have avoided going through wetlands had been explored. Mr. Broderick
responded that this was the only gravity route possible; any other route would
have necessitated a series of pumping stations, which the Town doesn't want.
The only other alternative would be the Wading River interceptor, which is
many dollars and years away from completion. The owners of Cabot, Cabot and
Forbes have given verbal permission for the project. This easement does not
restrict use to Camelot Estates, but their condition is that it be used for
only 33 homes.
The trenching will be variable, from three to nine feet. Material will be
replaced in the same order as it was removed. Commissioner Sweet noted that
some indication of that should be made on the plan so the contractor does in
fact do that. Questions were raised regarding movement of the groundwater
flowing through the washed stone on which the pipe will be laid. Clay
barriers would be possible, Mr. Broderick indicated, at every manhole (every
300 -330 feet). This would diffuse water and minimize transport. The Army
Corpos of Engineers have no problem with the plan; this project comes under
one of the 26 nationwide permits.
Mr. Wieczorek expressed concern with drainage all along the pipe, not just
in the area covered by this project. Mr. Broderick mentioned that additional
barriers could be installed. Commissioner Ouellette continued to have some
questions regarding some of the wetlands included in this project being used
as compensation area for Camelot Estates, These concerns, as well as
re- vegetation of the area, will be discussed during an on -site inspection by
the Commissioners, to be held on Wednesday night at 6:00 p.m. on August 6,
beginning at Plymouth St. The hearing was closed at 11 :30 p.m.
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMM14ISSION
MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 1986
MINUTES
PAGE FOUR
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF CONDITION NO. 5, FILE SE211 -138
Mr. Broderick submitted a letter requesting release from Condition No. 5
of the Order of Conditions for Camelot Estates, stating that no houses can be
built until the specified work was done. The system has now been completed.
I5V"-W;.�J -4rkFD l
Mr. Franey came before the Commission in an attempt to resolve the problem
of water draining onto his land, before going to court. Commissioners noted
that the culvert in question has been there for approximately 50 years, and
was placed there to handle road water. An enforcement order was issued to Mr.
Franey in response to his having dammed the culvert and thus affecting
wetlands without coming before the Commission.
Mr. Franey was asked if he had a suitable resolution to propose. Mr.
Franey's proposed solution of a ditch on the other side of the road from his
property does not fall within the Conservation Commission's jurisdiction.
Commissioner Ouellette reiterated her belief that as soon as the town had
unblocked the culvert, which it has the right to do, water would have flowed
onto Mr. Franey's land even if the Church had done no construction at all.
Chairman Sweet halted discussion at 11 :52.
NOTION: To approve the Enforcement Order issued by individual
Con ervation Commissioners to M. Franey.
(ODKLETTE - O'NEILL; Sweet abstaining) VOTED
ORDER OF CONDITIONS - File SE211 - 167
John Moynihan and Louis Zuliani, Forbes Boulevard - sewer project
1. Work shall be done per plan with revision date of June 27, 1986,
2. The sign required by General Condition 9 shall be visible from and next to
the road. No work shall be done until the sign is posted.
ERICK ROAD - File SE211 -158
The Crow Pond meeting held on July 21, as well as a site walk with DEQE
officials (Joel Hartley) resulted in evidence of the existence of a pond of
approximately 44,000 square feet. Ms. Pietrafetta produced an aerial
photograph dated 1980, from Cartographic Services Research Institute of
University of Massachusetts which has been given to Gary Nakuch of DEQE.
People who gave evidence of the pond's existence have been asked to submit
affadavits.
Mr. Makuch's advice was to, at minimum, issue an Enforcement Order to
remove fill from the left corner of the property and also to the right of the
retaining wall, where a stream has been filled without filing with the
Commission or the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Nakuch indicated that the 146
foot contour lines probably represent the original contours of the pond.
Commissioners noted that the Lot 3 leach field has been connected since the
Enforcement Order dated June 3, 1986 was issued.
It was noted that discussion between Mr. Hartley and Mr. Post was directed
toward filing a revised plan on the drainage system by August 11.
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION
MONDAY, AUGUST 4, 1986
MINUTES
PAGE FIVE
MOTION: To issue an Enforcement Order to return Lot 3 wetlands to their
original condition or to come before the Commission with a
compensation plan pending additional information from DEQE.
(MANDELL; no second)
NO VOTE
Commissioners discussed the necessity of notifying the Town Manager and
Selectment of the potential legal difficulties with regard to this file.
MOTION: To agree that a pond /wetland existed as of May 4, 1980 on the
northerly side in the complex known as Bristol Arms; that it
has been filled; that it must be compensated for or replaced;
that the Commission will seek legal counsel /advice necessary to
pursue having the owners return the area to wetland condition
or provide adequate compensation area.
(Mandell - O'Neill) NO VOTE
Commissioner Mandell will call DEQE to request help /advice.
MOTION: To issue an enforcment order to restore to its original
condition the northwest corner of Lot 3, Erick Road, where
filling of wetlands has taken place in violation of an
Enforcement Order and where sewer pipes have been connected to
septic tank in violation of an Enforcement Order; and to
replicate the area to the right of the wall.
(OUELLETTE - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED
MOTION: To agree that a body of water existed as of May 4, 1980 on the
northerly side in the complex known as Bristol Arms; that it
has been filled and built upon.
(Mandell - O'Neill; all in favor) VOTED
The meeting adjourned at 12 :48 a.m.
Approved by � �_ _ % (22t , 7l(,;
Date to Town Clerk: / P
/pkf