HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation Minutes 4/29/1987r
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES
wFOV,MDAY, APRIL 29, 1987 PAGE ONE
Members Present: Chairman Sweet, Comms, Carey, Graham, Ouellette
The meeting was called to order at 8:08 p.m.
WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT HEARING - 'File SE211 -200:
Salvatore Lombardo - -1386 East St.-= Replacement of septic system within the
P 100 foot buffer zone.'
The site is located next to Easton. A pump system, with `a leaching
chamberis proposed and has already been approved by the Board of Health. The
consensus was that the proposed system will be an improvement for the ground
water. There were no questions; no abutters were present. The hearing was
closed at 8:18.
ORDERS OF CONDITIONS - File SE211 -200: (see hearing, above)
The Orders were written to be identical to those proposed for File
SE211 -197, except that hay bales must extend '15 feet farther at either end of
the proposed siltation control 'line.
MOTION: To issue as discussed.
(OUELLETTE - "GRAHAM; all in favor) VOTED
ORDERS OF CONDITIONS -'File SE211 =197:
MOTION: To issue the Orders as proposed by Dick Lewis and as discussed.
(GRAHAM - OUELLETTE; all in favor) VOTED
WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT HEARING - File'SE211 -199:
Walmark Corporation - -Fruit Street, Nathan" Road,' Jefferson Road: 'Hallett
Crossing II -- Construction of 50 -ft, right -of -way; Nathan Rd. will require
filling 11,200 square feet of vegetated wetland and Jefferson Rd.' will
require filling 640 square feet of bordering vegetated wetland.
The hearing opened at 8:32. Mr. 'John Parmentier of Dunn Engineering
represented Walmark Corp.; Mssrs. Walter Millett and Ed Martin of Walmark were
also present. Wetlands have been flagged by`Lycott Environment Research
Labs., with Dunn engineering representatives. Water is shed towards Ware St.
and the Canoe River. The site drainage is controlled with culverts; a'slight
decrease in net runoff results from the proposed development. A Shell Oil
pipeline "runs through the proporty. Twenty -six percent of the site is
wetlands. " A compensatory area of 18,000 square feet is proposed, at an
elevation comparable to the original area. 'Groundwater conditions in the
proposed compensatory area are " "fairly 'similar" to the original wetland,
according to Mr. Parmentier, which is to be a long strip of land,
approximately 50 feet wide. The site is on town sewer and water. "House
locations are included in these plans." Lots 83 and '84 were reserved by the
Planning Board.
Mr. Parmentier maintained that this project merited "limited project"
status under regulation 10.53 (3) (e), because this was the best design with
regard to fire safety concerns, water /sewer concerns (looped vs, dead - ended),
and Planning Board limits for dead ends.
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES
HONDAY, APRIL 29, 1987 PAGE T140
WEf 414F -5 /cy
Commissioner Graham asked why the finger -like compensatory wetland rather
than an area contiguous to an existing wetland. Mr. Parmentier answered that
it had been done this way to ,satisfy concerns of the Town :Engineer for
creating "nuisance" wetlands. "Commissioner Ouellette noted that, according to
the regs., the overall horizontal configuration "shall be similar to that of
the area lost" and suggested compensation on both sides of the roadway.
Commissioner Ouellette also requested a road profile. Chairman Sweet asked
why the road couldn't be rerouted to cross a narrow section of the wetland.
Commissioner Graham commented that creating a compensatory area on the
border of the property, might possibly create problems for other, property
owners in the future (creating new buffer zones, etc.).
Mr. Parmentier maintained that alternative road designs would be
impractical and that the "proposed one is the best. <I don't think you can do
anything, else with it. It isn't very, easily; done." He also noted that the
sewer had been proposed to use a minimum slope, so by making the road any
longer it would raise the back end; the roads are proposed to be about 4 feet
above the current ground level, which would, provide the required amount of
cover. Commissioner Ouellette responded by pointing out that the Commission
has no responsibility to maximize usage of the land; she asked if "the plan is
designed to get the most lots." Mr. Parmentier's response was "To ,,get to the
land.
Dick Lewis asked whether Mr. Parmentier could supply the .Commission with
information about other comparable projects which have qualified as limited
projects under the act. Mr. Parmentier advised Dick that the Commission would /
probably, have to go to DEQE and check through their files,
Commissioner Ouellette then requested details about the sides of the
crossing. Mr. Parmentier described the edges as sloping, at a 3 -4 ft, height
above the wetland - a 2:1 slope. Commissioner requested that details of the
crossing be submitted with the road profile.
In response to a question, by Dick Lewis, Mr, Parmentier said that a
retaining wall had not been considered because it would be a nuisance insofar
as it would require maintenance. A bridge was also deemed impractical.
Chairman Sweet suggested that it was not the Commission's responsibility
to redesign the development, noting that the concensus of the board seemed, to
be a concern about accepting this as a limited project, given what appear to
be alternatives. Commissioner Graham suggested that the Commission look at
the site before making a final decision and closing the hearing. Chairman
Sweet informed the applicants that the hearing could be continued for the
purpose of revising the plans, or that it could be closed and the decision
made on the roadway plans as they stand. The applicant chose not to redesign
the roadway; the hearing was closed at 9:50. The site will be walked on
Saturday, May ,2, at 10:00, at the entrance of Harding Lane.
WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - File SE211 -195:
Robert C. Currivan-- Eastleigh Estates - -Rte. 106 ,(Mansfield /Easton line)
The hearing resumed at 10:01. New plans have not yet been filed with
DEQE. The detention area has been moved to the Mansfield side of the line,
upland from the bordering vegetated wetlands. Side slopes will be loamed and
i
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES
*ONDA -1, APRIL 29, 1987 PAGE THREE
weaNEspay
seeded. Easton has not completed its discussion of the plans. Dick Lewis
noted that a debris gate was missing from the plan, and asked regarding the
earthen berm whether a contract would :include !a compaction test, etc. to
ensure stability.,; Mr. Parmentier explained that there would be no need for
compaction because it will be about a year before it is used; driving over it
will probably be sufficient compaction.
Commissioner; Ouellette noted that the site walk revealed discrepancies
with the boundaries of wetlands as shown on the plans, which would affect the
buffer zone. Mr. Parmentier responded that they will re -mark the plans to
extend the borders about 20 -25 feet outward. It was also noted that revised
sheet 10, of exhibit D is missing from the newly submitted plans.
Mr. Parmentier asked whether a new filing ,would be required, or just a
review, if there were changes in the drainage configuration. The Commission
responded that any redesign of the detention basin /drainage; would at .`least
require review. The hearing closed at 10 :28.
ORDER OF CONDITIONS: File SE211 -189: Fralo Corporation, King Arthur Way
MOTION: To issue as written by Dick Lewis and discussed.
(OUELLETTE - GRAHAM; all in favor) VOTED
ORDER OF CONDITIONS: File SE211 -191: Lots 12 and 13, Maple St., Home Dev.
MOTION: To issue as written by Dick Lewis and discussed.
(OUELLETTE - GRAHAM; all in favor) VOTED
CAMELOT ESTATES FILE SE211 -138
Mr. Broderick presented a deed drawn up, by his lawyer ✓offering the
Commission a conservation easement, a rectangular belt around the edge of the
property, to provide for (1) inspection to determine compliance with the
Orders for File SE211 -138 and (2) modification of vegetation in the area. The
document has been read to the Town Manager. An estimate of $1200 for the
costs of converting an upland area to wetland was also provided, by Shepard's
Flowers; the amount to be held in escrow as proposed by Mr. Broderick is
$2000. The estimate was provided to answer the questions raised by Mr.
Broderick's proposal of an escrow account (see minutes of April 13).
MOTION: To approve the easement and $2000 account as presented by Mr.
Broderick, subject to Town Counsel approval.
(OUELLETTE - CAREY; all in favor) VOTED
MOTION: To release the remaining lots on Camelot, with the understanding
that a letter from the Commission shall accompany purchase and
sale agreements, stating that lots 15 and 19 are subject to
filing a Notice of Intent before being built.
(OUELLETTE - CAREY; all in favor, Graham abstaining) VOTED
FOREST PARK - FILE SE211 -191
Commissioners Ouellette and Carey discovered a cranberry bog not noted on
the original plans. It was felt that this issue could be addressed when
individual lots came before the Commission for review.
MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COP @EMISSION MINUTES
+0#OAY, "APRIL 29, 1987 PAGE FOUR
WBDP%eSDAy
MOTION: To issue an amended order of Conditions on Forest Park, noting
the revised plans ;submitted which included the redesign of the
roadway as !discussed on March 23.
(OUELLETTE - CAREY; all in favor, Graham abstained) VOTED
ABC TRUST
suygeS4ea
Town >Counsel Jack,Dwyernhiring a- :wetlands botanist to rsupport the
Commission. The issue was tabled until more of the Commissioners are present.
LANDFILL
Given that the landfill is located on a swamp, and given that leachate has
broken out and is not controlled, Commissioner; Graham felt that the Commission
should 'make 'a public statement in support of immediate landfill closure.
Commissioner Carey added that he has contacted a number of resource persons
who are willing to offer guidance to the town. The Town 'Manager has 'set ' the
process in motion by hiring a consultant.
MOTION: The Commission supports closure of the landfill July 1 or sooner.
(OUELLETTE - GRAHAM; all in favor) " VOTED
The meeting adjourned at 12:26 a.m.
Approved by:
Date to Town Clerk: {{N 9, o
/pkf V 'J