Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation Minutes 12/7/1987ji ! MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION r MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1987 Members Present: Chairman Sweet, Comms. The meeting was called to order at 8 :07. MINUTES ?AGE ONE WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION National Development Associates of Mansfield -- Mansfield Corporate Center MOTION: To close the hearing for File SE211 -221 at 8 :07. (O'NEILL - GRADY; all in favor) VOTED MOTION: To write the orders as proposed by the Conservation Agent. (GRADY - O'NEILL; all in favor; Mandell abstaining) VOTED MINUTES MOTION: To accept the minutes of November 16, striking the direct quotation of Mr. Grant's words and adding "Mr. Grant stated that he would not cooperate with DEQE, that he would take action against anyone who came onto his property, and that he would require a court order before anyone visits his property." (O'NEILL - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - File SE211 -226 Mayfair Realty & Development Co., Inc. -- Eastwind Estates On behalf of the applicant, Mr. John Parmentier requested a continuation. Chairman Sweet and Dick Lewis informed Mr. Parmentier that the wetland flags on the east side of the site did not seem to agree with the plans submitted, Chairman Sweet also requested that the pole numbers be indicated on the locus. MOTION: To continue to January 11 at 7:45 (O'NEILL - GRADY; all in favor) VOTED WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - File SE211 -224 J. Brugliera Construction Co., Inc. - -Essex Heights Mr. Parmentier submitted a new plan containing additional information requested by the Commission. Mr. Brugliera stated that an old foundation located on the site will be removed. Test holes 5 and 6 have been covered. The owner shown on the plan is incorrect; the owner is now J. Brugliera Construction Co. The cleaning of the pond area should be detailed in the Order. MOTION: To close the hearing at 8:42. (O'NEILL - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED 14ETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - File SE211 -225 Michael Peterson - -Echo Hills subdivision A new plan was submitted with a revision date of December 7, 1987. The commission asked Mr. Parmentier for a copy of a sheet detailing definitive riprap plans, Chairman Sweet noted his reservations about this site.. MOTION: To close the hearing at 9 :00, (MANDELL - O'NEILL; all in favor) VOTED WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - File SE2ll -222 NECCO Realty Corp. -- Eastbrook Estates Mr, Parmentier submitted a new plan dated December 7, 1987. Wetland flag points, details about the cul de sac, riprap, and detention area were included. Mr. Parmentier stated that a dike would be made at area 2, and that material removed from the outfall will be placed on an embankment of area 2. MOTION: To close the hearing at 9:15. (O'NEILL - GRADY; all in favor) VOTED MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1,987 PAGE T140 WETLAND PROTECTION ACT HEARING CONTINUATION - -No file number Hope St. Mansfield Realty Trust -- Jackson Village Mr. Parmentier requested a continuation, since the information requested by the Commission was not available at this time. Abutters and concerned citizens present included the following: Michael Castriotta 30 Kingman Ave. Adrianna Castriotta 30 Kingman Ave. Stephen Spilewski 979 N. Main St. Arduina DeSantis 28 Kingman Ave. Isabelle DeSantis 28 Kingman Ave. Richard Blandori 10 Pratt St. David May. 21 Oakland St. Barbara L. May 21 Oakland St. Edward A. Sliney 103 Charles St. Yvonne T. Sliney 103 Charles St. Dora Branchini 73 Brook St. Flavio Branchini 73 Brook St. Louise M. Baroncelli 82 Brook St. John Baroncelli 82 Brook St. Helena Havey 303 Hope St. Maureen Doherty 306 Hope St. Nelia Phillips 285 Hope St. Questions were raised on the following points: (1) Dick Lewis asked what happens to the bordering vegetated wetland line in a 100 -year storm event. The area is not within those studied by the town and federal government to determine flood levels. Mr. Speluski and others observed that there has traditionally been water in several places not noted on the plans. NOTION: To request a 100 -year flood study to answer the question of how high the water goes, with flow from the chocolate factory taken into account, and calculations and delineations shown on plans. (MANDELL - GRADY; all in favor) VOTED (2) Mr. May asked whether the amounts of water normally absorbed by the large trees present have been taken into account in the drainage calculations. Mr. Parmentier responded that various formulas are available to determine the difference between impervious surfaces and surfaces which allow drainage, some of which are based on denser or less dense forests. Commissioners and residents noted, however, that differences in size and expiration rates of trees, coupled with the large amount of rock ledge in this area, could have effects not covered by the standard formula applied in this case. NOTION: To continue the hearing to January 11 at 8 :00 p.m. (0'NEILL - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE _ File SE211 -175 (Greif Bros. /CWB Contractors) NOTION: To issue the Certificate as recommended by R. Lewis. (GRADY - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - File SE211 -173 (Cabot, Cabot & Forbes) MOTION: To issue the Certificate as recommended by R. Lewis. (MANDELL - GRADY; all in favor) VOTED MANSFIELD CONSERVATION COMM1- 11SSION MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1987 PAGE THREE BUDGET for FY 89 MOTION: To approve the budget proposal, narrative, and supplemental narrative submitted for review by R. Lewis, with the insertion of a consulting expense line to include_ a sum of at least $1; and to authorize the Agent, with the approval of the Chairman, to draft said budget in a form compatible with the Town Manager's requirements. (GRADY - MANDELL; all in favor) VOTED MOTION: To authorize the Agent to research appropriate language for a bylaw to assess the applicant for consulting fees. (GRADY - O'NEILL; all in favor) VOTED CORRESPONDENCE 1. Brochure from Sanford Ecological Services detailing its availability for consultation regarding wildlife evaluation. 2. Superseding Order of Conditions for File SE211- 185from DEQE, denying Ms. Franey's application to build on Old Elm St. Dick Lewis pointed out that DEQE had requested 100 year flood elevations for this area, and that this should probably be done when retention/ detention areas are near wetlands (cf. Jackson Village). 3. Bill for consultation services from Mr. Hewlettson. ( 4. Change in Mansfield Depot II plan, per Order of Conditions SE211 -209, from Keith Devt. 5. From Sabatia - wetlands evaluation for library site. NEW BUSINESS 1. Commissioner Mandell commented that the Treetops subdivision should be watched closely, since water is backing up on the site before development has even started. 2. Commissioner Grady, noting that water from the CC & F project in Foxboro is draining into a parcel on School St. (at the intersecion of School St. and Rte. 140, asked why CC & F is not filing with the Mansfield Commission. The meeting adjourned at 10:47. 9 Approved by:_ J Date to Town Clerk: 3 /pkf r