Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutmin of planning brd 3/4/1998PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 4, 1998 Present: Bernie Dolan, Scott A. Frank, H. Thomas French, Jr., Thomas P. McShane, John D. Sullivan, Jr., and Kenneth H. Torman. Meeting Called to Order at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Sullivan was nominated and voted Acting Chairman until Mr. French's arrival, and Mr. Dolan was nominated and voted Acting Clerk. (Torman- Frank) 4 -0 with Mr. French and Mr. McShane not present. PASSES Correspondence * Request for partial release of surety: Cottage Street Extension for completion of as- builts, legal description and bounds. Motion: To release $1,200.00 as requested, leaving a balance of $510.00 which represents the 10% contingency- (Dolan-Frank) 4 -0 with Mr. French and Mr. McShane not present PASSES * Request for partial release of surety: Cedar Ridge Estate for completion of as- builts, legal description and bounds. Motion: To release $1,763.00 as requested, leaving a balance of $5,462.00 which represents the 10% contingency. (Dolan- Torman) 4 -0 with Mr. French and Mr. McShane not present PASSES * Copy of letter to Board of Selectmen from Conservation Commission re: Great Woods * Building Construction Report for February, 1998 * Public Hearing Notice - Plainville Planning Board * Public Hearing Notice - North Attleboro ZBA Mr. Dolan asked Mr. Burke to check the site plan review for Osco Drug regarding a left turn from the parking lot onto Route 106. He recalled that prohibiting such a turn was a site plan recommendation. Dr. Torman questioned why the Transfer Station was an agenda item when there is no formal proposal before the Planning Board. Mr. Burke said he was asked by the chairman to place it on the agenda as a courtesy to another board member who asked that it be discussed at greater length than is practical during "Around the Table." Dr. Torman stated lie doesn't understand why we're discussing it in detail without a proposal and Mr. Sullivan said lie would rather see it discussed during "Around the Table." Mr. Frank asked when Bertucci's is planning to open. Mr. Burke reported they are on the Minutes of March 4, 1998 Selectmen's agenda tonight for their liquor license and expected they would be opening ( soon. Mr. Burke advised the board that the Zoning Board of Appeals has closed the hearing for the Motorola variance but has not yet signed and filed their decision. They have reportedly granted a variance for a 186 foot lattice tower and for setbacks significantly less than the height of the pole. He asked board members' opinion regarding appeal. Mr. Dolan suggested the decision be appealed. Mr. Frank said he would first like to see the decision. Mr. Burke asked the advisability of the Planning Board holding the hearing for Motorola's special permit application prior to their having the variance in hand. Mr. Frank suggested that they are two separate issues and, even if board members decide they want to appeal the grant of the variance, the Planning Board hearing can always be continued if the variance decision has not been filed by the time of the scheduled hearing. Mr. Burke also reported that Town Meeting has been moved to May 4th and the grant application for the bike path is due at SRPEDD March 13th. He further reported the Recreation Commission has not formally voted to support the bike path and asked if the Planning Board would be willing to sponsor the article. Discussion ensued as to whether it properly falls under the Planning Board's jurisdiction, with it being noted it was a high priority of the Master Plan. Motion: To sponsor the article since the Recreation Commission may not meet until after the grant application is due and the Master Plan supported it overwhelmingly. ( (Dolan- Frank) 3 -0 -1 with Dr. Torman abstaining and Mr. French and Mr. McShane not present. PASSES Mr. McShane arrived at this point and noted that, in reviewing the Zoning By -law, it appears from Section 4.3.4 paragraph C that landscaping and buffering should be coming to the Planning Board for review and recommendation even if the project doesn't come before Planning Board for approval. After review and discussion of the issue, Mr. Burke and board members agreed. The hearing was opened at 8:00 p.m. with Mr. Sullivan reviewing the provisions of the Scenic Road Act in accordance with M.G.L. Chapter 40, Section 15C and Chapter 20 of the Mansfield General By -law. Mr. Dolan read the Notice of Public Hearing which appeared in the Mansfield News on February 13th and 20th. Lee Azinheira, Town Engineer, noted the hearing was a continuation of their prior hearing and the plans were now at the 75% stage. He reviewed the key issues remaining from the last ]tearing and updated the board on how concerns had been addressed. • Bridge facing - will be granite ornamental facing with stone on both sides and the arch • Guard rails - wooden posts with steel rails painted brown will be used. MassHighway does not have a standard for wooden rails • Pedestrian bridge - the old bridge is being removed. MassHighway would not fund the 2 Minutes of March 4. 1998 pedestrian bridge because the new bridge has sidewalks. If the town wishes to pursue it as a separate project, Mr. Azinheira said he would be willing to design a timber bridge which could be constructed by the Department of Public Works once the MassHighway project is complete and the project is turned over to the Town. • Trees - all trees within the road right -of -way which measure 1 112 inches in diameter at 12 inches from the ground have been identified. He reviewed the color key used on the plan to identify various trees, noting the 29 trees disturbed will be replaced with 40 new trees meeting Planning Board specifications. Mr. Dolan read a memo dated July 16, 1997 from Richard Lewis, Environmental and Conservation Planner. Walter Meehan of 292 Williams Street stated he believes this project is the biggest violation of the Scenic Road Act the Town has ever had, commenting that the construction is supposed to take place in the existing roadway and that he would like a count of the damage done to trees. Mr. Azinheira replied that all the trees Mr. Meehan is referring to were outside of the existing right -of -way and are highlighted on the plan. Mr. Azinheira noted the spillway is being moved to just ahead of the new project and the current spillway is a major liability now because of its condition. The proposal includes replacing the spillway, taking out the old bridge, and putting in a coffer dam. The pond will not be drained during the process. Frank Goffredo of 256 Williams Street asked if the relocation of the roadway is legal. Mr. Burke explained the Scenic Road Act does not prevent changes from being made - -it requires that a public hearing be held and approval granted prior to making the changes. Carl Briggs of Douglas Drive asked about the elevation of the pond and the water level. Mr. Azinheira said it will not change. Mr. Meehan asked if it will be a controlled dam. Gerard Grapple of Lichenstein Associates said it would be. Leonard Flynn of Jewell Street said he thinks this proposal is a vast improvement over the original plan, even though he would rather see no bridge. He noted it is aesthetically pleasing and, to get State funding, you have to comply with State regulations. Mr. Goffredo asked why the project is exempt from Conservation Commission when there are wetlands. Mr. Azinheira replied that MassHighway has parameters they work within with footprints for bridge replacements. At the 75% submission, they determine whether to go to the Conservation Commission. He noted he has worked with them and will make sure silt control and erosion standards are met. He pointed out that DEP, EPA and U.S. Fish and Wildlife have all been involved in the project and they all had problems with the original proposal. Mr. Meehan asked about the deeded conservation land. Attorney Susan Jacobs, representing Town Counsel, addressed the issue and explained the process to be followed. 3 Minutes of March 4. 1998 Ken Parsons of 423 Williams Street asked what the timetable is for the project. Mr. Azinheira replied that if all acquisitions proceed in a timely manner, construction will be done next year. Mr. Briggs suggested that a strong argum nt be presented to Town Meeting regarding the dam and the cost that will have to be borne by the Town if it's not picked up by MassHighway as part of this project. Mr. Dolan asked if the bridge, because it's a safety hazard, will have to be removed at the Town's cost if we do nothing. Mr. Azinheira said it would, eventually. Mr. McShane asked if the ownership issue has been resolved and if Mr. Azinheira would respond to the comments about the new bridge not being in the existing road layout. Mr. Azinheira said ownership has been resolved. Mr. Sullivan noted we are limited to what falls within the roadway and that's what is covered by the Scenic Roads Act. Mr. Burke pointed out that the only part of the project that has any impact on the scenic road is where it leaves the existing right -of -way and returns to the existing right -of -way. Mr. McShane then asked if the Town is going to have to replace the dam if it's not done as part of this project. Mr. Azinheira replied that the Board of Selectmen has held hearings and determined that it's in the Town's best interest to replace the bridge, and the spillway will be the Town's responsibility. We could be spending close the $1 million. Mr. McShane asked if the Board of Selectmen would still think we should go ahead with this project if we're paying for it. Mr. Azinheira noted it's a public safety issue and lie cannot answer for the Selectmen. Mr. McShane, in considering the public benefit cf the project, asked if there was a way to structure the project to include the cost of a lineal parkway. Mr. Azinheira suggested making it a condition that it be done within a specific timeframe from completion of the MassHighway project. Board members continued discussing various concerns and conditions they would like to see addressed. Motion: To close the public hearing. ( Torman- Dolan) 5 -0 PASSES Discussion ensued as to whether it was premature to vote at this point. Mr. Sullivan pointed out that the board is voting on the area within the scenic roadway in order to preserve and enhance the natural character and beauty of the scenic road. Mr. Dolan stated the situation is a disaster waiting to happen, that we're not destroying something that exists, and that someone is going to get hurt. Dr. Torman noted the purpose of a scenic road is for people to enjoy the beauty of it. Right now the only people who can enjoy it are the people who live there and that if you can't drive on it, it's not a road. In the meantime the bridge must be replaced to prevent someone from getting hurt and the need exists to get the funding so the Town won't have to foot the bill. Mr. McShane stated he sees no benefit without a lineal parkway and doesn't think we 4 Minutes of March 4. 1998 should be acting on it unless the Conservation Commission agrees to it. Mr. Sullivan responded that right now we have a roadway that isn't a roadway and the benefit to the public is to make it passable and safe. Mr. McShane asserted that this particular bridge exists on a roadway which, at the time, was one of eleven locations in Mansfield that Town Meeting thought was important enough to designate as a scenic road and it should be reconstructed where it is today and not somewhere else because it costs less. Mr. Burke stated we have been involved in this process for three years, the bridge has been closed for a number of years and there is a public safety concern. He noted there is a major difference in the layout of the new design and that it is now more in keeping with the area. The common good is served by the reconstruction and relocation of the bridge and the design engineering firm has done an admirable job attempting to do a footprint reconstruction and it won't work because it won't be safe. In the meantime great effort has been made to maintain the spirit of the Scenic Road Act and public comment has been incorporated into the design to make the new bridge look like it belongs in the area. We are in a unique position where the Town Engineer has both a civil engineer's and structural engineer's stamp and we have a DPW Director who has many years construction experience. Mr. McShane said he would be happy if we could accomplish the lineal parkway through them, but fears that once the State funds are obtained, it will just be forgotten. Motion: To request Shaun Burke to draft of positive recommendation to include the following conditions: • identify on the plan the 29 trees that will be removed • written response to the Planning Board regarding concerns of Conservation agent in memorandum of July 16, 1997, with copy of response to Conservation Commission • development of timber pedestrian bridge by Town within two years of completion of MassHighway bridge construction project (Torman- Dolan) 4 -0 -1 with Mr. McShane abstaining PASSES The Public Hearing on the Eastern Container Special Permit, scheduled for 8:30 p.m., was opened at 9:10 p.m. Present to represent the applicant were Attorney Frank Spillane; Steve Malley, General Manager; Kevin Quinn, architect; Bill Buckley, Bay Colony Engineering; and Chris Linde, landscape architect. Thomas French, Planning Board Chairman, arrived.at 9:30 p.m. Mr. Spillane reviewed the process up to the present time. He stated the parcel on which the building is located contains 10.7 acres, with the existing building being 132,515 square feet. The property was once two lots with separate buildings and in January of 1988, Eastern Container purchased Corofab and in February of 1989 purchased Foamfab. The two buildings were connected in 1991 with the construction of an addition, making it one ( building. They are proposing an addition of 94,872 square feet and seeking a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals, in addition to the Planning Board Special Permit. 5 Minutes or March 4. 1998 They are also purchasing an additional 5.235 acre parcel to be added to their lot. Although they propose to increase the area of impervious surface within a Groundwater Protection District, they are improving their on -site drainage. The addition will also result in reduced truck traffic to the site, as they will be able to warehouse on site, eliminating the need to truck product across town to leased warehouse space on Suffolk Road. Bill Buckley reviewed the improved drainage system, noting their need to be sensitive to both water quality and water quantity issues because of the location of the site. DEP Storntwater Guidelines were used in an effort to clean the water before it reaches groundwater and recharge. It appears the property was mined at some earlier time, resulting in their being a lot of low spots on the site. He reviewed the drainage detail on Sheet 3 -C, showing piping into the catchbasins, out to the swale along the back of the parking area, using Best Management Practices (BMP), deep sump catch basins and vegetated swales requiring minimal maintenance. This will result in being above the 80% total suspended solids removal level recommended by BMP. Each basin has been designed to handle a 100 -year storm. Correspondence was read from the following Departments: • Fire Prevention Division of the Fire Department dated February 23, 1998 • Steve Bishop of the Water Department dated January 29, 1998 • Pltm. Lance Lawson, Police Department Traffic Division, dated February 16, 1998 • Richard Lewis, Environmental & Conservation Planner dated March 4, 1998 • Scott Leite, Health Agent, dated March 4, 1998 • Lee Azinheira, Town Engineer, dated March 4, 1998 Mr. Buckley addressed staff comments, noting in response to comments made by Mr. Azinheira that they are trying to avoid the cuttinsz of trees on the bottom part of the parcel. With regard to comments of Ptlm. Lawson, he noted the curb cut exists on Maple Street and they are trying to consolidate warehousing and tractor trailer activities in one area. Mr. Linde responded to sight distance comments, showing photographs and pointing out they are trying to create a "boulevard" effect, while at the salve time designing the landscape plantings to comply with the intent of the by -law. He stated they are providing buffering in the back area and there are a substantial number of existing trees along the north property line. Around the perimeter there is quite a bit of secondary growth and they will maintain as many of the existing trees as possible, with Austrian pines being used to plug the holes in the visual barrier where it's broken by the Shell Oil Company easement. The area where pallets are being stored will be grassed over. He said they will work on sight distances on the south end of the site where the tree canopy is in the sight line of the truck cabs and the sign is a sight obstruction for passenger vehicles. Pamela Sawin of 9 Joanna Drive, Foxboro, said she has concerns regarding noise and light pollution, hours of business, idling of trucks, outside paging, and sight pollution from her 6 Minalcs of March 4. 1998 property. Mr. Quinn responded, saying they intend to screen the lighting and it will not reach beyond the edge of the pavement. In addition, they will use baffles to prevent lighting beyond the pavement to exceed one -tenth of a foot - candle. They will operate on two shifts, with trucking ending between 11 p.m. and midnight. The truck traffic will be reduced about 30 to 50 percent. Exterior paging will be eliminated. The addition will be no more than six feet higher than the existing building. There are more loading docks with the addition, which will result in less idling of vehicles waiting to be loaded. Mr. Linde reviewed the species and height of trees to be planted. Mr. Quinn noted the parking lot lights could be put off after the second shift and they will work with the Police Department regarding what lights need to stay on for patrol. Jim Wall of 15 Joanna Drive, Foxboro, asked about truck parking and it was shown to him on the plan. Jeff Muir of 3 Summer Street, Foxboro, said he is concerned about noise and asked if truck loading could be eliminated altogether at night. He was told that traffic at night would be drastically reduced, but they have one or two customers who require night deliveries. The grading change adjacent to the Muir residence was also discussed. Mr. Frank noted they mentioned an additional parcel of land and asked if it is shown on the plan. Mr. Frank also asked if the floor drains would be connected to the sewer and if oil/water separators are shown. Mr. Dolan asked about curb cuts on Oakland Street. Mr. McShane asked if there is any LPG storage or use of hazardous materials on the site and location of handicapped parking spaces. All of these questions were answered to the board's satisfaction. Mr. McShane also asked if the existing sign on Maple Street could be removed to eliminate the sight distance hazard and if a noise barrier could be put on the homeowners' side of the property, in addition to trees. Mr. Linde noted noise barriers are expensive, aesthetically obtrusive, and are not as effective as people would have you believe they are. Mr. McShane asked the number of jobs which would be created by the expansion and was told 15 people would be added to the existing workforce of 206. Mr. Sullivan asked how many test pits were done and how the permeability rate was done and was told five pits were done, and the results are in the drainage report. Mr. Sullivan stated he is concerned about extrapolating information from the perc tests to establish flow rates. Mr. Buckley said he is very comfortable with the numbers, but will address the issue. Mr. Sullivan also asked where the Shell Oil easement would be moved to. Mr. Buckley said it would be going to the east side of the proposed building, but they're not sure of the exact location yet. Mr. Burke noted the Zoning Board of Appeals has continued their public hearing on the application to March 17th and suggested this hearing be continued until after that time, which would allow the applicant to address the Planning Board's concerns. He noted areas to be addressed as lighting, suggesting it be noted on the plan which lights will be turned off during the night; plantings, asking them to consider adding euonamous; 7 Minutes of March 4. 1998 consideration of a policy to keep outside doors closed except when trucks are being loaded; establishing a schedule of when trailers are being loaded and unloaded so tractors are moving around the yard as little as possible during the evening hours. Motion: To continue the public hearing to March 25, 1998 at 8:00 p.m. (Frank - Torman) 6 -0 PASSES Sto and Sho Gas Stafroa S ectat Permit<Pubhc 1FCear[n The public hearing was opened at 10:45 p.m., with Mr. Sullivan reading the notice of public hearing as it appeared in the Mansfield Hews on February 13th and February 20, 1998. Present to represent Stop and Shop were: Attorney Bob Davis of Golden & Storrs, 400 Atlantic Avenue; Curt Avalon and Mike Proctor of Stop & Shop operations; Al Trakimas of Tyree Engineering; Bob Brown of VHBNanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.; and Lisa Davis of Lisa Davis Associates. Mr. Davis noted the original development was completed during 1995 and 1996 and done in accordance with the Zoning By -law and various other approvals. The proposed fuel system was reviewed, showing a 20,000 gallon underground tank divided into two compartments - -one 12,000 gallons and a secondary 8,000 gallon tank - -of double wall construction with 360 degree secondary containment. Also reviewed were the monitoring, alarm, and pumping systems. Other safety measures were also reviewed, with it being noted the attendant has manual control over the entire operation. Because of the proximity to wetlands, there is continuous trench drainage along both sides of the fuel dispensing area, with the trench drains going to an oil/water separator on site. Additional on -site parking will be gained by restriping for 30 compact car spaces and adding additional spaces in the loading area for employee parking. Mr. Sullivan asked if they are parking over the underground tanks, to which they replied they are and that it's a common situation. Mr. Frank asked if they are counting the fueling spaces as parking spaces to meet the requirement. Mr. Trakimus said they are, after being advised by the Building Inspector that they could do so. Mr. Proctor, Stop & Shop Fuel Operations Manager, said they are enhancing the one -stop shopping concept and that their typical customer is a female head -of- household who has purchased groceries and gas when checking out and then fill up on the same lot. Hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and 9:00 p.m. on Sunday. Cashiers from the store will be selected to be attendants. They will work in the kiosk, which will also sell cigarettes, candy bars, gum, and windshield washer fluid. There will not be any repair work done at the site. Bob Brown of VHB reviewed the various tables in the traffic study and the traffic patterns to be established. He also discussed fuel deliveries, noting the tankers would be on -site ( about twenty minutes. 8 Minutes of March 4. 1998 Mr. Sullivan read correspondence from the following: • Pltm. Lance Lawson of the Police Department Traffic Division, dated February 16, 1998 • Steve Bishop, Water Department Foreman, dated January 29, 1998 • Richard Lewis, Environmental & Conservation Planner, dated February 5, 1998 • Lee Azinheira, Town Engineer, dated February 25, 1998 • Lt. Joseph Sarro, Fire Prevention Division, dated February 23, 1998 Shirley Hanlon of 55 Creedon Street asked how many of the 404 spaces people will use as double spaces and where equipment is going to be stored. She was advised it would be stored in back and off -site. As a member of the Conservation Commission, she asked if they would be filing a Request for Determination. Mr. Proctor said they are on the edge of a buffer zone and would be. Mr. French questioned the use of PVC pipe, to which Mr. Proctor said that would be revised if the determination is made that they are not within the buffer zone. Karl Clemmey of South Main Street said he is a direct abutter at 360 Chauncy Street and asked if green cards (certified mailing) have been turned in by counsel. He was advised that they are in the file. Mr. Clemmey also noted they need to get permits from the Board of Selectmen and Fire Department and asked if they have the other permits needed. Mr. Proctor advised him that they first have to get the Special Permit from the Planning Board and will then go before the Board of Selectmen. Dan Clemmey noted the concerns of the Conservation Commission and stated it would be best to get their input before making any decision since it would change things if they are within the 100 foot buffer. He pointed out that there are wetland issues and water quality issues and that the standards in the stormwater policy need to be addressed. He also questioned compliance with the Zoning By -law parking requirements, as well as landscaping and buffering requirements. He suggested the need for a curb cut permit from MassHighway, a MEPA study, and a traffic study. Karl Clemmey also questioned floor area ratio and lighting plans, noting he would like to see an illustration of the kind of lights they plait to use. Tony Shaw of 8 Windemere Drive and operator of Shaw's Mobil questioned the ability of a tanker truck coming in from Forbes Boulevard to safely maneuver the area and the site given the volume of traffic in the area. He also asked if the kiosk was going to sell oil and, when told they are not, questioned why they would want to spend that kind of money for the project based -on the limited business they are projecting to do. Larry Jackson of Willow Street noted "City" of Mansfield used on the applicant's handouts, stating we're still a town and that it's already tough getting around with all the traffic congestion. Mr. Frank asked about pedestrian access if they park in the south portion of the lot and ( was told it will be the same as it is now. He also asked if there are any plans to expand to 24 -hour operation and was told there are not. Mr. Frank stated he does not share the 9 Minutes of March 4, 1998 Building Inspector's opinion that fueling spaces can be counted toward meeting the t required number of parking spaces. He also suggested they note on the plan the hours during which fueling will be done. Dr. Torman asked if it is legal to sell fuel and alcohol on the same property and was told it is not against the law. Mr. Sullivan asked if only the drainage from the concrete mat goes to the oil/water separator and was told that is correct. He then questioned drainage from the southeast corner of the parking lot which appears on the plan to slope down to the catchbasin. He was told it's the same as any road or parking lot, to which Mr. Sullivan responded that's why he is surprised to see it on the plan. The applicants stated they would be willing to put in a second oillwater separator as part of the project. Mr. Sullivan also asked if anyone would have to check the level of the tank and was told it would be done at shift changes. In addition, the levels are checked electronically and the readings can be accessed from their office via telephone lines. Mr. McShane asked Mr. Trakimus how much experience he has had with this fuel dispensing system. He responded that he's had 12 years experience at 200 facilities throughout New England and has worked in Mansfield in the past. Mr. McShane asked if he has experienced any leaks in the pumping system during that time, to which Mr. Trakimus spoke of the top of the tank where the valves have fittings for the turbine pumps and under the dispenser itself with the flex hoses as being two areas where he has experienced leaks, noting that in each instance safety measures were in place to contain them and prevent any environmental contamination or hazard. He further stated that inspections are done on a regular basis and he can't recall that there have been any incidents, pointing out that the tanks are topped with a concrete mat which would avoid any borings. Mr. McShane asked how long the manufacturer warranties the tank and was told 30 years. Mr. McShane asked additional questions regarding traffic counts and on- site traffic circulation which were answered by Mr. Brown, Mr. Avalon and Ms. Davis. Additional traffic count information will be provided. He also asked if they intend to comply with the Town's landscaping and buffering requirements and was told they are grandfathered and are not creating any additional impervious surface. They noted if they were required to do additional landscaping, providing the required parking would be a problem. Mr. McShane stated he would at least like to see them attempt to meet the spirit of the current landscaping requirements. Mr. Burke pointed out that their plans do not show signage on the canopy, while the photographs presented show signage and internal lighting. Mr. Proctor replied that the pictures represent signs which have already been approved at other facilities. Mr. Burke also asked if they would be going to MEPA or getting a MassHighway curbcut permit. Mr. Brown and Mr. Avalon responded, saying that would only be necessary if they were generating 500 new trips per day, which they are not. Mr. Burke asked if the tank will be anchored. Mr. Trakimus said it would be anchored with concrete. In response to Mr. Burke's questions, Mr. Avalon advised him the kiosk would be staffed and have a phone 10 Minutes of March 4. 1998 to the main store and additional security features. The applicant will provide further information from MassHighway and MEPA to demonstrate they have met all their requirements. Karl Clemmey took exception to the fact that they are an existing building and don't need to meet current landscaping and buffering requirements, stating that he believes the alteration of the site necessitates compliance. He also stated he would like to see an illustration of the light fixtures to be used and would like to see an opinion from MassHighway and the Conservation Commission regarding the location of the tanks to wetlands before the Planning Board takes action on the request. He asked, as a person authorized to speak on behalf of the owner of record of 360 Chauncy Street, to see proof of the applicant's claims put into the record. Motion: To continue the public hearing to March 25, 1998 at 8:30 p.m. (Sullivan - Torman) 6 -0 PASSES ;�,d��urnm8nt Motion: To adjourn at 12:20 a.m. (Dolan - Torman) 6 -0 PASSES M? S;-Izfi ignature of Clerk Date of Approval iYe t Meets g Ntarr ij � ?$ t 7 .*30'g ttl 11 Minutes of March 4, 1998