Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutmin of planning brd 01/10/01 ~ () rDWN~ffCEIVED Planning Board Minutes D" 'PHS OF'F'ee January 10, 2001 JAN 31 P Present: H. Thomas French, ~hairman; Bernie Dolan, Clerk; Mark/~oo~:. '11 2: 32 Kenneth Torman, Roger AchIlle, Scott Frank I1A.SftiSF/fL Shaun p, Burke, Director of PI ann in and Develo ment '" A CH D 1. Minutes November 29,2000 Motion: To approve as submitted (Torman-Achille) Four in favor. Cook abstained, PASSES Mr. Frank arrived at 7:40 p.m. 2. Minutes December 13,2000 Motion: To approve as submitted (Torman-Achille) All in favor. PASSES 3. Request for partial release of surety - Woodland Park - Stan Feck Motion: To release $4,783.63 from Phase I and $31,702.75 from Phase II (Dolan-Torman) All in favor. PASSES 4. Request for partial release of surety - Wayfield - Kevin Delaney Motion: To release $14,957.00 (Dolan-Cook) All in favor. PASSES 5. Request for partial release of surety - Canoe River Drive cul-de-sac - Doug King Motion: To release 13,771.00 (Dolan-Frank) All in favor. PASSES 6. Request for partial release of surety - Homefield Farms - Folkman/Zola Motion: To release $14,141.78 (Dolan-Frank) All in favor. PASSES 7. Memo from Mike Ahem re: surety amount for Ridgeview - Endriunas Bros Motion: To set the surety amount to be posted at $184,082.00 (Dolan-Frank) All in favor. PASSES 8. Zoning Board of Appeals application for variance - 40 Wexford Drive - sideyard Mr. Burke suggested a negative recommendation Motion: To send the Zoning Board of Appeals a negative recommendation because there is no substantial hardship related to the shape of the lot or the topography demonstrated, as defined in Chapter 40A, Section 7 (Frank- Torman) Mr. Frank said that while the grant of this variance may not adversely affect the neighborhood, the builder created the problem by the way he positioned the house. Mr. French said the thought there was a hardship because of the property line. Three in favor. Three opposed. No Recommendation 9. Letter from John D'Agostino re: "Future Search Conference" January 10 & 11 10. December Building Summary 11. Meeting notices Attleboro Zoning Board of Appeals; North Attleboro Planning Board; Easton Zoning Board of Appeals; Attleboro Planning Board; Foxboro Planning Board 12. SRPEDD Regional Review newsletter 13. APA National Planning Conference Program 14. Planning magazine 15. NE Real Estate Journal 16. Memo from John D' Agostino re: Annual Town Meeting warrant 17. Meeting notices: Foxboro & Attleboro Zoning Boards of Appeals () n r-- 18. January 2001 MAPD meeting notes 19. January MAPD meeting notice 20. The Beacon 21.. Neighborhood Reinvestment Training Institute Meeting notice 22. Weston & Sampson Inspector newsletter 23. Mass Interchange newsletter The clerk read a letter from the applicant requesting a continuance to February 7,2001 and an extension of the Planning Board's final decision date to February 21,2001. Motion: To continue the public hearing to February 7, 2001 at 8:30 p.m. (Dolan-Torman) All in favor. PASSES East Street - Hanson Associates - creating two lots, one conforming, the other non- conforming with less than the required frontage. The plan contains a note to that effect. Motion: To sign the Form A plan (Dolan-Frank) All in favor. PASSES r Essex Street - Lawrence Winslow - taking the land out of Chapter 6lA and creating five lots, all with the proper area and frontage. Lot 6 is "remaining land" and is partially in Mansfield and partially in Norton. Motion: Not to endorse the plan and notifY the applicant's engineer to submit a second sheet showing the meets and bounds of all lots shown on the plan, specifically Lot 6 (Frank-Dolan) Four in favor. Dolan, Cook opposed. PASSES Mr. Burke presented three possible zoning amendments for Annual Town Meeting. The first would change the single driveway requirement in industrial zones to allow two driveways, and to allow them to be wider. More than two driveways would require a special permit from the Planning Board. The second would make the modification of landscaping requirements special permit of the Planning Board. Mr. French suggested rather than a special permit, a landscaping modification could be a finding of the board, which would not slow down the permitting process but still ensure quality development. Mr. Frank said he thought applicants should read the requirements of the Zoning By- Law closely enough that they could start the landscape modification process at the same time they file plans. Mr. Burke suggested the special permit requirement remain, but said he would draft an amendment to make it a finding. r The third amendment involves removing the requirement to construct pedestrian access through buffer zones. r r r Mr. Dolan said at the recent meeting regarding water issues, several issues had been raised that may be addressed through amendments to the Zoning By-Law. Mr. Burke said he would investigate that, but said many of thosetliings,:such as vegetation type, could be done through the Subdivision Regulations. / . Mr. French asked for two volunteers to serve on the Capital Improvements Committee. Mr. Dolan and Mr. Achille said they would like to serve again. Dr. Torman asked ifthere were any Zoning By-Law issues that had come up during the Great Waves discussions that should be cleaned up at Town Meeting. Mr. Burke did not think so, but said the landowners have asked to meet with the town to come up with a good use for the property. Motion: To send the Board of Selectmen a letter encouraging them to meet with the landowner's representatives to work out the best use for the site (Torman-Dolan) All in favor. PASSES Motion: To adjourn at 9:00 p.m. (Torman-Frank) All in favor. PASSES Date of next meeting: January 24,2000 at 7:30 p.m. ~~..Y~ Ignature of Cl J - L'I--II Date of Approval