Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConservation Comm. 01/31/2022i Town of Mansfield Conservation Commission January 31, 2022 Minutes PFOEIVED 1''_F!tJ4S OFFICE 5N APR -8 A 8: 03 MEETING HELD VIRTUALLY USING GOTOWEBINAR PLATFORM Present: Michael Healey, Chair; Dr. Aaron Roth, Vice Chair; Aaron Gallagher; Jeffrey Paters;,§arkv oynes; Katelyn Gonyer, Environmental and Conservation Planner. 1. The Chair opened the meeting at 6:04 pm. 2. Mr. Healey opened the discussion for the potential acquisition of thirty acres of forested land at 177 Old Elm Street. He said the property is available to the town because it was classified as a forestry area which resulted in a decrease in taxes and under this program the town as the right of first refusal when the property comes up for sale. Ms. Gonyer said this information was also shared with the Open Space and Recreation Committee for the recommendation to the Select Board, who are asking for the Conservation Commission to review the potential acquisition to see if it falls within our criteria of land we would normally want to acquire. This parcel of land is in Chapter 61 Forestry Land, which means whenever there is a proposed change in use or sale of that property, because of the tax break, the town has first right of refusal of acquisition Ms. Gonyer said this is a 33-acre parcel of land that is surrounded by Conservation land, Natural Resource Trust land as well as town -owned land and would be a great place for a trail system someday. She said the Open Space and Recreation Committee reviewed all the information concerning this property and voted to recommend to the town that it acquire the parcel at 177 Old Elm Street for perpetuity and conservation. She said of the thirty-three (33) acre parcel, three (3) acres of land will be reserved for the existing property. Mr. Paten asked about the reserved three acres. Ms. Gonyer said the property with the existing house is at the front of the parcel and the rest of the reserved acres would be for an additional lot. Public Comments: Mr. Healey read the following script: "It is important to us that you have a platform for your questions and comments during this meeting, therefore to ask questions or make a public comment during tonight's virtual meeting you must have registered and joined the meeting via GoToWebinar where you now have the ability to submit your questions or comments through the questions option in your control panel, or you can use the raise your hand option to be allowed to speak. As with any public meeting we ask you to be respectful of the Board members and the other residents who are making their comments by patiently and quietly waiting your turn. Thank you." Ms. Kristine Snow asked why the town is not purchasing the full thirty-three acres of land. Ms. Gonyer said this is the proposal that was given to the Conservation Commission by the Select Board because the owner wants to keep the existing house and keep apart from Conservation land; if the full thirty-three acres is acquired the land would no longer be considered a residential lot. Ms. Snow noted there is another interested party for the property, a school. Ms. Gonyer said tonight's discussion is only for the potential acquisition of the thirty acres because the use of the land is not in the Conservation Commission's jurisdiction. Ms. Linda Kelley asked if the thirty acres are protected areas for wildlife. Ms. Gonyer said the property is a forested area with uplands; the upland areas would connect other trails in West Mansfield. Dr. Elshaar, Al Noor Academy, said the school is interested in acquiring the land for the school but would donate some of the land to the town. Board Comments: Ms. Joynes asked if a portion of the three -acre parcel frontage would be for access onto the thirty acres. Ms. Gonyer said yes there would be a portion of land to the north for access. Mr. Healey said there are a number of properties owned by the town and NRT that can be used as an access point to this land. Dr. Roth made the motion to recommend the town acquire the thirty acres of land available at 177 Old Elm Street, to be placed under Conservation protection. Ms. Joynes seconded the motion. Mr. Gallagher— in favor Ms. Joynes - in favor Mr. Healey — in favor Mr. Paten — favor Dr. Roth — in favor Motion passed 5-0-0 Discussion ended at 6:29 pm. 3. Request for Certificate of Compliance: Turchetta and Associates, 58 York Road, Lot 100. Mr. Healey open the hearing for a Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Turchetta and Associates at 58 York Road. Ms. Gonyer said the Order of Conditions was issued in February 1991 for the construction of a single- family dwelling and grading under DEP SE 211-344, with a partial Certificate of Compliance issued in April 1992 because the lawn area was not stabilized at that time. The Order has since expired. She recommended that a full Certificate of Compliance be issued. Mr. Paten made the motion to issued the full Certificate of Compliance to Turchetta & Associates, for 58 York Road, Lot 100. The Order of Conditions was issued in February 1991 for the construction of a single- family dwelling and grading under DEP SE 211-344. Ms. Joynes seconded the motion. Dr. Roth —in favor Mr. Paten — in favor Mr. Healey— in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Gallagher — in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. Hearing ended at 6:33 pm. 4. Request for Certificate of Compliance: AGS Development Corp., 310 West Street, Map 11, Parcel 21. Mr. Healey opened the hearing forthe requestfora Certificate of Compliance for AGS Development Corp., 310 West Street, for an Amended Order of Conditions for an addition, deck, fencing, restoration planting area and associated drainage for a single-family dwelling within 100 feet of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Intermittent Stream under DEP SE 211-0980. Ms. Gonyer said this Order of Conditions was issued in August of 2018 after a Stop Work and Enforcement Order was issued for the site. A developer had purchased the lot at foreclosure and had started work on the property without any permits. She said they removed two large willow trees within the stream and all the debris from the trees was put into the wetlands causing water to back up on the property. She said this was a difficult site because ownership changed many times and the Commission finally said until all the impacts to the wetlands were mitigated, no work or restoration on the house was permitted. in 2020 AGS Development Corp. purchased the property and the site was cleaned up, the restoration areas were restored and a split rail fence was installed along the 25-foot NDZ. She worked with AGS Development Corp. for two years and a peer consultant was hired to review and get the property into compliance. Ms. Gonyer mentioned when the Certificate of Compliance is issued, it gets recorded at the Registry of Deeds and the Commission has the option to put on -going conditions only as they were cited in the original Order. She recommended a full Certificate of Compliance be issued with the on -going conditions; #2 all work must conform to the plan dated November 1, 2018 and #25 all work must conform to the plan dated January 22, 2022 that shows the location of the split rail fence. The fence is to remain in place in perpetuity. Board Comments: Mr. Healey noted the house was pre-existing and predates our regulations. He said this is a vast improvement to the property. Dr. Roth asked if the sump pumps are still being used and would the water be discharged to the lawn area. Ms. Gonyer said there is a pump in the basement in case the water level is high but at this time no water is being pumped out and any waterfrom the sump pump would go through the rip rap (filter fabric) placed between the fence and where the lawn drops off, and discharged back into the system. Dr. Roth asked if there is still knotweed past the split rail fence. Ms. Gonyer said the area is now colonized with native plants, namely golden rod. She said if in the future this area becomes overrun with invasive species she would have to get involved again. Ms. Joynes made the motion to issue a full Certificate of Compliance to AGS Development Corp., 310 West Street, for an Amended Order of Conditions for an addition, deck, fencing, restoration planting area and associated drainage for a single-family dwelling within 100 feet of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Intermittent Stream under DEP SE 211-0980, with the ongoing conditions, #2 all work must conform to the plan dated November 1, 2018 and #25 all work must conform to the plan dated January 22, 2020, showing the location of the split rail fence. The fence is to remain in place in perpetuity. Dr. Roth seconded the motion. Mr. Gallagher —in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Healey —in favor Mr. Paten —in favor Dr. Roth — in favor. Motion passed 5-0-0. Mr. Eliot Schneider said they are a mortgage company that purchase this property at foreclosure. He believes the house is under agreement and said he will have the new owners get in touch with Ms. Gonyer and will let the new owners know the fence is to remain in place in perpetuity. Hearing ended at 6:50 pm. 5. Request for Certificate of Compliance: Raj Moholtra, 50 Wood Avenue (Parcel 20, Lot 124). Mr. Healey opened the hearing for the request for a Certificate of Compliance for Raj Moholtra, 50 Wood Avenue, for the construction of a storage facility within Bordering Vegetated Wetland under DEP SE 211- 0921. James DeVellis of was present. Ms. Gonyer said this is the storage facility located at 50 Wood Avenue. She said this was a very complicated project. She explained prior to the construction of the building this was a mine gravel pit and in the 1970s they basically scraped off all the top soil so there was no organic material or vegetation and the wetland on the site, which was really disturbed and overgrown with invasive species, was not a high functioning system. Ms. Gonyer said she worked with Arthur Allen, a wetland/soil scientist, and James DeVellis, engineer for the project. Mr. Allen was brought into provide all the reports requested and was on -site during the restoration. Ms. Gonyer said she recently met on site with Mr. Allen and Mr. DeVellis because the owner had let the invasive species become overgrown. The detention basin on site had also become overgrown with invasive species, but is now functioning fine. She said there was an Invasive Species Management plan as part of the Order and said she would need to see that the invasive species would be managed before the Certificate was issued. Ms. Gonyer said the site is immaculate and a well -contained site. She said on -going conditions would be the Stormwater 0&M and the wetland reports, so the Commission has some monitoring in perpetuity and Condition #23, wetland replication plan. She said her only area of concern is where the stair well is in the back corner of the property. Mr. DeVellis said when filing for the Certificate of Compliance, he walked the site with Ms. Gonyer and Mr. Allen to discuss the invasive species and it was decided the best time to do the work would be in the fall. Everything is now in compliance. They also looked at the area in the back corner and no erosion has occurred on site. 0 Dr. Roth asked if the Invasive Species Management Plan is part of the replication plan. Ms. Gonyer said the wetland replication plan and Invasive Species Plan were for three growing seasons after the Order was issued. She said she is not sure we can legally hold the owner to implement the invasive species management, because once the Certificate has been issued, other than putting these on -going conditions in the Certificate of Compliance, to be enforced in perpetuity, would make it a violation of the on -going conditions because you cannot introduce new conditions to the Certificate of Compliance that are not already part of the Order. She said she will write out the replication plan and invasive species plan as an O&M. Dr. Roth said this should be discussed going forward with future Orders. He asked if this was the site where they moved the delineation. Ms. Gonyer said the delineation was pushed out during construction, but the 25-foot and the limit of work has been re-established. For the area near the stair well at the rear of the property, she said she will follow up in the spring. Ms. Gonyer recommended a full Certificate of Compliance be issued with the on -going conditions to be included on the Certificate of Compliance: #23, Stormwater Management Plan 0&M and #24, wetland replication plan. Mr. Gallagher made the motion to issue a full Certificate of Compliance to Raj Moholtra, SOWood Avenue (Parcel 20, Lot 124) for the construction of a storage facility within 100 feet of Bordering Vegetated Wetland under DEP SE 211-0921 with the following on -going conditions: #23, Stormwater Management Plan 0 & M, #24, wetland replication plan and the condition that the area near the stair well at the rear of the facility will be inspected by the Agent in the spring. Mr. Paten seconded the motion. Dr. Roth — in favor Mr. Paten — in favor Mr. Healey —in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Gallagher —in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. Hearing ended at 7:16 pm. 6. Request for Certificate of Compliance: David and Rachel Hall, 33 Oak Leaf Drive. Mr. Healey opened the hearing for David and Rachel Hall, 33 Oak Leaf Drive, Map 15, Parcel 96 for the construction of an addition, grading and septic within 100 feet of Bordering Vegetated Wetland under DEP SE 211-0987. Ms. Gonyer said the Order of Conditions was issued earlier this year and the addition and septic system are located in the approved location and the disturbed areas have been stabilized per the letter from the engineer and the as built plan. Dr. Roth made the motion to issued a full Certificate of Compliance to David and Rachel Hall, 33 Oak Leaf Drive, Map 15, Parcel 96 for the construction of an addition, grading and septic within 100 feet of Bordering Vegetated Wetland under DEP SE 211-0987. Ms. Joynes seconded the motion. Mr. Gallagher — in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Healey — in favor Mr. Paten — i n favor Dr. Roth — in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. Hearing ended at 7:11 pm. 7. Request for Certificate of Compliance: Paulette Rioux, 30 Saddle Ridge Road. Mr. Healey opened the hearing for a request for a Certificate of Compliance for Paulette Rioux, 30 Saddle Ridge Road, Lot 3 Map 3, Parcel 19 for the construction of a single-family dwelling with associated appurtenances within the 100-foot buffer zone of Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Natural Heritage Estimated and Priority Habitat under DEP SE 211-0937. Ms. Gonyer said this Order was issued in 2015 for this house lot, which was one of five lots on Saddle Ridge Road in Wayside Estates. She said this was one of the lesser jurisdictional lots, with only a portion of the septic system located in the 100-foot buffer; the house and driveway were located outside of the buffer zone. At the last hearing there was some discrepancies with the letter and the as built plan so the hearing was continued. Ms. Gonyer said a letter from the engineer dated December 1, 2021 was received stating the project is in full compliance. She recommended a full Certificate of Compliance be issued to Paulette Rioux, 30 Saddle Ridge Road, Lot 3 Map 3, Parcel 19. Mr. Paten made the motion to issue a full Certificate of Compliance to Paulette Rioux, 30 Saddle Ridge Road, Lot 3 Map 3, Parcel 19 for the construction of a single-family dwelling with associated appurtenances within the 100-foot buffer zone of Bordering Vegetated Wetland and Natural Heritage Estimated and Priority Habitat under DEP SE 211-0937. Mr. Gallagher seconded the motion. Dr. Roth — in favor Mr. Paten — in favor Mr. Healey — in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Gallagher— in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. Ms. Gonyer stated for the record, since this property is within a Natural Heritage Endangered Species Area, it is exempt under Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA). Hearing ended at 7:23 pm. 8. Notice of Intent: Shawn Carroll, 230 Plain Street, Map 4, Parcel 75. L Mr. Healey opened the hearing for Shawn Carroll, 230 Plain Street, Map 4, Parcel 75 for a proposed in - ground pool within 100 feet of Inland Bank of Greenwood Lake under DEP SE 211-0992. Craig Cygawnoski, RIM Engineering Co., Inc. and homeowner Eddie Dee were present. Ms. Gonyer said this filing was for a proposed in -ground pool that was within 35 feet of the inland bank of Greenwood Lake. She said at the last hearing in November there were concerns about the pool's proximity to the lake, the proposed amount of patio on the property and the existing shed within the 25- foot No Touch Zone; she said the shed is a pre-existing, non -conforming structure and she would not mandate the shed be removed but it would become part of the mitigation. She said the Commission also asked for some minimization of anything extra on the property; the brick walkway on the west side of the property will be removed and the existing paved driveway will be replaced with pervious pavers. The footprint of the large patio in the pool area will be reduced and changed with pervious pavers. The pool did change a little, expanded by 2 feet, and will not be a saltwater pool. Ms. Gonyer said there would have to be a plan for discharging the water from the pool. The pool equipment is to be placed in the existing fenced area, east of the house. She asked if a buffer zone or a strip of plantings could be placed in the area of existing lawn close to Greenwood Lake along the top of the bank. She said they did a lot of changes and reduction on the property. Mr. Cygawnoski said there will be terracing along the extreme slope on the east side of the property. He noted the owner of the property volunteered to remove all the existing pavement and any existing patios, especially the patio under the deck, which will be replaced with pervious pavers, allowing for increased infiltration directly below the paving system. He said the brick walkway will be removed and an existing patio on the west side of the property will also be removed. He said the dimensions of the pool did not change, the measurements shown on the plan are wrong and the pool will only be 42" deep and the back edge of the pool will be approximately one foot out of the ground. As for the shed, Mr. Cygawnoski said the owner talked with the building inspector about the history of the site and in the 1950s, this property was a campground area with four or five sheds, pre -dating the Wetland Protection Act and the Conservation By-law. Ms. Gonyer asked if the shed was on blocks or a concrete pad. Mr. Cygawnoski said he believes the shed is on a concrete pad. She asked for some plantings to the south and around the shed. Board Comments: Mr. Healey agreed with Ms. Gonyer that the decrease in the impervious surfaces is substantial. He suggested it would be better to have plantings with deeper and larger roots in the resource area buffer zone at the top of the bank and then transitioning into the property. He said the intent of the plantings is not to restrict access to the dock. Ms. Gonyer suggested woody shrubs and arborvitaes and the shed be allowed to remain. Ms. Gonyer said she would meet on site with the homeowner to help develop a plan for the plantings along this area. Ms. Joynes asked if there was a fence along the water. Mr. Dee said there is a fence in the front and along the both sides of the property and by the water. Mr. Cygawnoski said the terraced area on the east side of the house would be foamed and seeded. As for staging, the materials would be stored in front and removed off -site the same day as excavation. Ms. Gonyer asked about dewatering during the installation of the pool. Mr. Cygawnoski said the pool water would be pumped to the front of the property in the road area. Ms. Gonyer said they would have to make sure no sediment goes into the system. Dr. Roth said the amount of thought and work that went into this project is better than what was previously presented to the Commission, but said it seems as if a lot of the impervious areas being removed are outside the 100-foot buffer to alleviate what is being put in the 100-foot buffer and noted, proportionally, with what we are adding within the resource areas, he is not sure this is a big tradeoff. He said the problem with the shed is it is for storage and we have no control over what would be stored in there. Mr. Dee said he would only be storing lawn furniture in the shed. Ms. Gonyer said no hazardous materials can be stored in the shed. Ms. Gonyer said we do not allow structures in the 25-foot area but sometimes moving a structure out of the 25-foot area causes more damage and impacts. Ms. Gonyer said she would accept leaving the shed where it is now if we could reclaim some of the 25-foot area. She said there should be more substantial plantings between the shed and the wall. She said one of her biggest concerns is the lawn area going right up to the edge of Greenwood Lake. She would like to see a lot of naturalized areas and asked if Mr. Dee would be willing to put some sort of physical demarcation along the edge of the lake. Mr. Dee said he did not have a problem with this. Dr. Roth said he would be fine with this but his concern is in the future when there is a new owner of the property that there would be nothing to stop the new owner from making changes to the property. Ms. Gonyer said we could put into the Order of Conditions that the runoff from outside the jurisdictional areas is not allowed to enter into the jurisdictional areas, that additional runoff from the street or driveway would have to go into the drainage system. Dr. Roth said he looks at this as an absolute improvement from what was existing but wants to know that the improvements that are being done can be maintained in perpetuity. Ms. Gonyer said she is concerned with the pool maintenance with a future owner and said she will draft a substantial maintenance plan to go with the Order. Mr. Gallagher made the motion to issue an Order of Conditions to Shawn Carroll, 230 Plain Street, Map 4, Parcel 75 for a proposed in -ground pool within 100 feet of Inland Bank of Greenwood Lake under DEP SE 211-0992 with the following Special Conditions underthe Mansfield Wetland Protection By-law: 1. No work can be started until the Order of Conditions has been recorded with the Bristol County Registry of Deeds and the receipt of the Order is returned to the Commission filled in by the Registry. 2. All work must conform to the plan dated January 14, 2022, referenced as "the plan of record" in this Order. 3. All limits of work and erosion controls shall be installed prior to any construction, clearing, or excavation. The erosion controls, as shown on the plan of record dated January 14, 2022, shall consist of an 8" diameter biodegradable mulch -filled silt sock with wooden stakes every 10 feet on each sides of sock or equivalent (do not pierce silt sock with stakes). In addition to the silt sock, trenched -in silt fence may be required depending on the specific site conditions. See the Conservation Agent (Agent) for specific erosion control design standards. The Applicant shall notify the Agent when any such devices or measures are installed so that a site visit can be conducted prior to the commencement of work. 4. The Commission reserves the right to require additional mitigation or erosion control devices or measures if mitigation or erosion control devices are not adequately installed or maintained on site. 5. The Applicant shall ensure that all demarcation (i.e. limits of work) and erosion control devices will remain in place and be maintained throughout the construction process and until all disturbed areas are stabilized. Stabilization shall be achieved once a complete vegetative cover is reached. Seeded areas shall be covered with a suitable protective cover to allow the seed to germinated and become established. All side slopes greater than 3:1(but less than 2:1) are to be covered with jute mesh and seeded. At no point shall erosion occur resulting in sediment entering the wetland areas. If erosion occurs, the Agent is to be contacted to review the extent of the erosion and determine follow-up actions. 6. Prior to the start of any work, a site visit must be conducted with the Agent and any contractor(s) 7. A construction sequence is to be submitted to the Commission prior to the start of work. 8. The Conservation Commission or its agent is to be notified of the starting date of the work prior to its commencement. 9. The Applicant shall be responsible to ensure that all contractors on site during construction have received and reviewed the Order of Conditions and all plans of record. 10. The Certificate of Compliance shall be requested in writing upon completion of the project. At the same time, the applicant or any successor shall, upon completion of the project; submit an as -built plan and letter signed by a professional engineer, certifying that the work has been done in accordance with the approved plan. Applicant must include any hardscaping, patios, walkways, etc. on the as built plan. 11. Any modifications or revisions to the plan(s) referenced in this Order must be submitted to the Commission for review. For single family lots, this Order is for the structures shown on the plan of record only. Any additional structures including, but not limited to, decks, patios, sheds, pools, walkways and/or any hardscape features must be reviewed by the Commission. If, after their review, the Commission finds that the changes are not significant enough (minor modifications) to warrant an Amended Order or new Notice of Intent, then the revised plans shall be considered the new plan of record. If the changes are significant enough to warrant an Amended Order or new Notice of Intent, then the applicant is required to file accordingly. 12. Signage for single family lots: Prior to receiving a Certificate of Compliance, the Applicant must install permanent "Environmentally Sensitive Area" signs on the subject lot. The quantity and location of the sign are to be designated by the Commission or the Agent on a case by case basis. The 4" discs (reading "Environmentally Sensitive Area, Do Not Disturb"), hardware and method of installation are available at Conservation Department. 13. All new in -ground or above -ground pools shall use a cartridge filtration system or a filtration system where all backwash is directed to a drywell on the same property. At no point shall pool backwash be discharged into a wetland resource area. All pool water is to be de -chlorinated before it is drained from a pool. All drained water is to be drained over the land/lawn of the same property. When seasonally draining the pool water it is to be pumped directly into a tank truck not into the municipal stormwater systems or the lake. 14. Salt water is not allowed in the pool. 15. Pool equipment is to be placed in the existing fence are located on the east side of the house. 16. After the pool area is constructed and area has been loamed and seeded the existing access to the rear off the driveway on the east side of the house is to be terraced as shown on the plan to slow runoff from the top of the hill at the driveway toward the lake. All street runoff is to be directed away from the resource area. 17. The proposed pool apron is to be constructed using a pervious paver system. 18. Walkway from front entrance along the west side of the house is to be removed 19. Existing paved driveway, brick walkways and the patio under the deck are to be removed and replaced in same area with pervious pavers (drainage profile under the pavers show crushed stone and filter fabric to promote better infiltration) as shown on the plan of record revised January 14, 2022. 20. Prior to start of work, the Applicant must submit details (O&M Pool Maintenance Plan) on annual pool seasonal maintenance including specific type of filter, managing backwash, type of chemicals used, and method for draining pool. 21. Install two (2) frog logs or similar product in the pool. 22. Excavated material to be stockpiled in the front of property and must be removed from the site the same day as excavation occurs. 23. Propose enhancing plantings along the buffer strip of the inland bank with several woody shrubs and grasses, plantings and location are to be approved by the Agent. 24. No hazardous materials are to be stored in the existing shed. 25. All stormwater from the driveway and/or Plain Street shall be infiltrated outside of the 100-foot buffer. Mr. Gallagher seconded the motion. Dr. Roth — in favor Mr. Paten—infavor Mr. Healey — i n favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Gallagher— in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. Hearing ended at 8:08 pm. 9. New Business: • Reorganization of Board Mr. Gallagher motioned to nominate Mr. Healey for Chair Dr. Roth seconded the motion Mr. Gallagher —in favor Ms. Joynes— in favor Mr. Paten —in favor Dr. Roth — in favor Mr. Healey — in favor Motion passed 5-0-0 Mr. Gallagher motioned to nominate Dr. Roth for Vice -Chair Dr. Roth seconded the motion Mr. Gallagher— in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Paten — in favor Dr. Roth — in favor 10 Mr. Healey —in favor Motion passed 5-0-0. • Bristol County Mosquito Control Project: Ms. Gonyer said Bristol County Mosquito Control has exemptions through the Wetland Protection Act in order to control the mosquito population. They send out a letter of notification. This letter is for the Xfinity Center for a swale. 10. Old Business: November 29, 2021Minutes: Mr. Gallagher made the motion to accept the minutes of November 29, 2021 as written. Ms. Joynes seconded the motion. Mr. Gallagher— in favor Ms. Joynes — in favor Mr. Healey —in favor Mr. Paten —in favor Dr. Roth — in favor Motion passed 5-0-0 11. Adjournment: Ms. Joynes made the motion to adjourn at 8: 27 pm. Mr. Gallagher seconded the motion. Dr. Roth —in favor Mr. Paten —in favor Mr. Healey —in favor Ms. Joynes— in favor Mr. Gallagher — in favor The next meeting will be March 28, 2022 at 6:00 pm in Meeting Room 3 A/B. f q __--- 3-2-Fi -Z-'Z- Michael Healey, Chair Date 11