HomeMy WebLinkAboutQAPjP for HP & Clemmey Tank - 11/25/1998RESOURCE
CONTROLS
The proven solution to your
environmental needs.
474 Broadway
Pawwcke4 RI 02860-1377
401728.6860
Fax 401727.1849
18 Lincoln Avenue
Scituate, MA 02066-4620
781545-3908
Fax 781 S4S-9068
November 25, 1998
Mr, Alan Peterson
Northeast Regional Laboratory
60 Westview MCEQE
Lexington, MA 02173
m
RECEIVED
NOV 3 0 1998
TOWN MANAGER'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Quality Assurance Project Plan
Hatheway & Patterson and Clemmey Tank Site
Town of Mansfield, Brownfields Pilot Project
Assistance Agreement BP991019-01-0
Dear Mr. Peterson:
This letter was prepared by Resource Controls for the Town ofMansfield, Brownfields
Pilot Project. Attached to this letter is the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) for
the above -referenced site. The QAPjP was prepared pursuant to EPA Form 5700-20A
(Rev. 5-82), Part III Award Conditions, page 6, number 9.
As you will see in the schedule outlined in the QAPjP, field related assessment activities
are scheduled to begin December 7, 1998. To maintain the proposed schedule and
expedite the assessment project, Resource Controls requests the EPA complete the
review of the QAPjP by December 4, 1998. The Resource Controls project team is
prepared to meet with the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program managers on December 4,
1998 to discuss the QAPjP, and overall site assessment scope of work. Resource
Controls has already contacted Mr. Richard Lewis, the Town of Mansfield,
Conservation Agent to coordinate this meeting.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Christopher
E. Gill.
Very truly yours,
RESOURCE CONTROL ASSOCIATES, INC.
,WNNr
Men C. Atwood,
President
www.deanstartcom
�(ES0URCE
CONTROLS
The proven solution to your
environmental needs.
cc: Mr. John D'Agostino
Town Manager
6 Park Row
Mansfield, MA 02048-2433
Mr. Richard Lewis
Town of Mansfield
Conservation Commission
6 Park Row
Mansfield, MA 02048-2433
Mr. Frank Gay
Administrator
Greater Attleboro -Taunton Regional Transit Authority
7 Mill Street
Attleboro, MA 02703
Mr. Mitch Kearny
Mr. Al Hanscom
VHB, Inc.
101 Walnut Street
Watertown, MA 02471
Ms. Meghan Cassidy
EPA Brownfield Project Manager
USEPA Brownfield Not Program
JFK Federal Building
(Mail Code HBT)
Boston, MA 02203
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix A
1. Title and Approval Page
Ouality Assurance Project Plan (OAPjP)
Document Title
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Revision Date:11/25/98
Page: 1 of 36
Mr. Robert C. Atwood, PE, LSP and
Mr. Christopher E. Gill, Resource Control Associates, Inc.
Prepared by: (Preparer's Name and Organizational Affiliation)
474 Broadway, Pawtucket, RI 02860 (401) 728-6860
Address and Telephone Number
25-11-98
Day/Month/Year
Project Directo GL
Signature
Robert C. Atwood PE LSP
Printed Name/Date
j�� -
Project Mana er:
Signature
Project QA Officer:
U.S. EPA Project Manager Approval:
Christopher E. Gill /I flJ �900
/ Printed amN e/Date
Signature
Mark House /! - zS - IF
Printed Name/Date
Signature
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:
Site Name: Hatheway and Patterson Facility Revision Date:
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 2 of 36
Appendix B
2. Project Organization and Responsibility
(Fill-in the blanks, if applicable, otherwise insert another project -specific chart.)
SEE ATTACHED ORGANIZATION CHART
]-8E
c
m
�
o
m
�
U
H
�
N
C
N
W
N
C
L
E
O
C
W
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 3 of 36
Appendix C
3. Problem Definition (use multiple pages if needed)
The purpose of this Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) is to summarize the proposed sampling
and analysis strategy, sampling procedures, analytical procedures and other procedures that will be
followed to assure that quality data will be collected during the assessment of oil and hazardous
material contamination at the Hatheway and Patterson former wood treating facility, and the
Clemmey Tank Site located in Mansfield, Massachusetts.
Facility operations at the Hatheway and Patterson facility have resulted in the contamination of soil,
sediments, surface water, groundwater in overburden soils and potentially groundwater in bedrock.
Contaminants of the various media include pentachlorphenol (PCP), fluorochrome-areeenate-phenol
(FCAP), fuel oil [polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, (PAH)], creosote, and dioxins. Underground
and aboveground storage tank construction and coating operations at the Clemmey Tank Site have
resulted in contamination of sediments and soil. Groundwater assessment has not been conducted
at the Clemmey Tank Site. PAH is the only known contaminate at the Clemmey Tank Site.
The purpose of the proposed Site Assessment is to:
delineate the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination to the extent possible,
• quantify the concentrations of contamination in the various media,
• identify the nature of contaminant migration at the site including potential pathways related
to soil, groundwater (overburden and bedrock), surface water sediments and air,
• determine if further clean-up of site contamination is necessary to protect human health,
welfare and the environment,
or construct specific barriers or impediments which would sufficiently reduce the risk to
human health, welfare and the environment and,
• determine the potential for future development of the site as an access route for the Town of
Mansfield commuter rail station.
The Hatheway and Patterson site is located in a mixed residential/industrial area. Operations at the
site included wood preserving and the manufacture of wood sheeting, planking, piling, poles, and
other wood products. According to historical information, Hatheway and Patterson began operations
at the site in 1953 utilizing PCP in fuel oil and creosote to treat lumber. From 1958 to 1974,
solutions of PCP in fuel oil and FCAP salts in water were employed. From 1960 to 1984, PCP in
mineral spirits was also used. From 1974 through 1984, Hatheway and Patterson utilized solutions
of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) salts in water along with PCP in fuel oil. Beginning in 1984,
and continuing until the facility closed in April 1993, solutions of CCA salts in water and PCP in
water were used at the site. The company filed for bankruptcy in February of 1993. The site is
currently inactive and access is restricted by chain link and barbed wire fence around the property
and padlocked gates.
In October 1989, a Phase II Site Investigation and Preliminary Health and Environmental
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 4 of 36
Assessment Report was prepared by Keystone Environmental Resources, Inc. of Monroeville,
Pennsylvania for Hatheway and Patterson Company, Inc. The purpose of the investigation was to
delineate the areal extent of soil, sediment, surface water and groundwater contamination at the
Hatheway and Patterson facility.
In December 1994, a Final Report - Soil Sampling and Field Screening was prepared by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Environmental Response Team (ERT). The report
summarized the results of a surface soil extent -of -contamination survey for the presence of CCA
metals using field portable X-ray fluorescence analysis and for PAH and PCP using immunoassay
field screening kits.
In April of 1997, assessment activities were conducted at the Clemmey Tank Site. Soil and sediment
samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of RCRA 8 Metals, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(TPH), and asbestos. Groundwater samples were not collected
Currently, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) are conducting site assessment activities which include collection of soil samples,
river sediment samples, surface water samples, and fish samples. DEP is requesting that EPA
conduct additional site assessment activities such as excavation of test pits. If necessary, Resource
Controls will adjust the proposed scope of work to prevent redundant assessment activities at the
site.
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date:11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 5 of 36
Appendix D
4. Project Description (use multiple pages if necessary):
4.1 Investigation Summary
The purpose of conducting a Site Assessment of the Hatheway and Patterson Facility and the
Clemmey Tank Site is to define the vertical and horizontal distribution of contamination in
sediments, soil, overburden and bedrock groundwater. Field screening and laboratory analytical
data will collected from the various media to quantify concentrations of pentachlorphenol (PCP),
fluorochrome-aresenate-phenol (FCAP), fuel oil (PAH), creosote, and dioxins.
Proposed investigation methodologies to complete the Site Assessment of the Hatheway and
Patterson Facility include, but are not limited to, the following:
Collection of sediment and soil samples using the Geoprobe soil sampling technique, hollow
stem auger drilling and split spoon soil sampling technique, and surface soil grab samples
using hand augering.
Collection of groundwater samples from existing and proposed overburden monitoring wells.
Collection of groundwater samples from the bedrock aquifer from existing and proposed
bedrock monitoring wells.
Review of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Geographical
Information Systems (GIS) Maps to identify areas of critical environmental concern
including, but not limited to, endangered species or critical habitats for flora and fauna in the
vicinity of the site.
Review of historical and proposed assessment data to evaluate the potential for contaminant
migration.
Assessment of the Clemmey Tank Site will not include collection of Geoprobe soil samples or
installation of bedrock groundwater monitoring wells.
To improve the efficiency of the Hatheway and Patterson Facility Site Assessment and data review,
the site will be divided into four quadrants. Quadrant one is the northeast area, quadrant two is the
southeast area, quadrant three is the southwest area, and quadrant four is the northwest area of the
site. The quadrants of the Site are divided based upon proximity to the Rumford River and the
railroad tracks. Sample locations will be determined based upon information provided in previous
site investigation reports and site conditions observed during assessment activities.
Site assessment for the presence of dioxins in sediments, soil, groundwater and surface water is
limited to approximately two samples. Massachusetts DEP and U.S. EPA are currently conducting
assessment activities to delineate dioxin contamination at the site. Assessment has included
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date:11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 6 of 36
collection of surface water, sediment and fish samples from the Rumford River and Fulton Pond for
laboratory analysis of dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), semi-VOCs, pentachlorophenol, pesticides, and RCRA 8 Metals.
4.2 Geoprobe Soil and Groundwater Sampling
On the Hatheway and Patterson Facility, approximately 50 locations will be identified for collection
of soil samples using the Geoprobe soil sampling technique. Geoprobe soil sample locations will
be coordinated in a grid square pattern with each sample location approximately 100 foot on center.
Sample locations will be adjusted as field conditions and field screening results dictate. Each
Geoprobe location will have a minimum of one soil sample submitted for laboratory analysis of
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons with PAH using DEP Method 1.0. Selected samples will be
submitted for laboratory analysis of Copper (Cu), Chromium (Cr), and Arsenic (As) metals, and
semi-VOCs using EPA Method 8270.
4.3 Test Pit Excavation
Excavation of test pits will be conducted using a rubber tire backhoe. Test pit locations will be
determined based on EPA assessment activities, historical site investigation information, and the
results of the Geoprobe assessment. Test pits will be excavated to approximately 10-feet below
ground surface, or until groundwater is observed in the bottom of the excavation. Excavated soil
will be screened for the presence of volatile organic vapors using a PID and the jar-headspace
technique. Soil screening results and lithology will be logged in the field by a Resource Controls
field scientist.
4.4 Overburden Monitoring Well Installation
Approximately 12 overburden monitoring wells will be installed on the Hatheway and Patterson
Facility. Four additional monitoring wells may be installed at the Hatheway and Patterson Facility
based upon site conditions. Four monitoring wells will be installed on the Clemmey Tank Site..
Approximately four of the monitoring wells installed on the Hatheway and Patterson Facility will
be excavated to the depth of bedrock to determine bedrock topography. The boreholes will be
grouted within two feet below of the bottom of the monitoring well to prevent vertical migration
within the aquifer. Monitoring well depth will be dependent upon depth to bedrock, drilling
conditions and field screening for the presence of contamination. Soil boring equipment will be
steam cleaned between borings.
Split spoon soil samples will be collected continuously from ground surface to 10-feet below ground
surface and at five foot intervals thereafter. Each soil sample will be placed in a clean eight -ounce
glass jar for headspace analysis. The jar will be filled halfway and tightly covered with aluminum
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date:11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 7 of 36
foil. Each soil sample will be screened for the presence of volatile organic vapors using a Photovac
Photoicnization Detector (PID) with a 10.6 eV lamp calibrated to a benzene standard of 100 parts
per million per volume (ppmv). Soil lithology, field screening results, and monitoring well
construction details will be logged in the field by a Resource Controls field geologist. Boring logs
will be submitted with the final Site Assessment Report.
The monitoring wells will be constructed of two-inch diameter, thread -coupled, Schedule 40 PVC
materials with 10-foot lengths ofmachine cut, 0.010-inch slotted well screen placed across the water
table interface. Several wells will be screened at depths below the water table interface to provide
groundwater samples at depth in the overburden aquifer and to monitor vertical groundwater
migration.
4.5 Bedrock Monitoring Well Installation
Approximately four bedrock monitoring wells will be installed at Hatheway and Patterson Facility
to provide bedrock aquifer monitoring and sampling points. Each boring will be advanced to the
overburden/bedrock boundary using the hollow stem auger drilling method. The borings will be
continued using percussion air hammer drilling method through fractured bedrock (approximately
five to ten feet) until competent bedrock is encountered. Four -inch diameter carbon steel casing will
be inserted to the bottom of the boring. A three foot bentonite seal will be grouted inside of the
casing. The annulus of the casing will be tremmie-grouted with bentonite from the bottom of the
casing to five feet below ground surface to provide a seal between the bedrock and overburden
aquifers and to prevent vertical migration in the annulus in the overburden aquifer. The remaining
five feet of annulus will be cemented to form a seal from surface water runoff. After allowing the
grout and cement seals to set overnight, the monitoring wells will be advanced approximately ten -
feet into competent bedrock using the coring drilling method. Depending upon bedrock competency,
the wells may either be left as open hole monitoring wells or completed with two-inch diameter
thread -coupled, Schedule 40 PVC materials with 10-foot lengths of machine cut, 0.010-inch slotted
well screen and #1 well gravel in the annulus.
No bedrock monitoring wells are proposed for the Clemmey Tank Site.
4.6 Monitoring Well Development
Upon completion of installation, each monitoring well will be developed using bailing and surging.
Approximately five well volumes will be bailed from each well to ensure hydraulic connection
between the monitoring well and the aquifer.
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date:11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 8 of 36
4.7 Groundwater Elevation Survey
Subsequent to installation of monitoring wells on the Hatheway and Patterson Facility and the
Clemmey Tank Site, existing and proposed monitoring well top -of -casing elevations will be
surveyed to an arbitrary datum of 100 feet. Monitoring well locations will be surveyed using
stadia/angle reference to known site features. Subsequent to the survey, each monitoring well will
be gauged using an oil/water interface probe to measure depth to groundwater and non -aqueous
phase liquid (NAPL) thickness. Groundwater elevation data will be plotted on a site plan and lines
of equal piezometric head elevation will be plotted to produce a Water Table Contour Plan
illustrating groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient. Product thicknesses will be plotted
on a site plan and lines of equal product thickness will be plotted to produce a NAPL
Isoconcentration Plan.
4.8 Soil Sampling
During soil boring activities, soil samples will be collected by either split spoon soil samplers or
macro -core direct push samplers using standard ASTM penetration test methods. During test pit
excavation activities, grab samples will be collected from the soil stockpile immediately after
removal from the excavation. The depth and location of all soil samples will be noted on soil boring
logs and/or test pit excavation logs.
Soil samples will be screened for the presence of volatile organic vapors using a PID and the jar-
headspace technique. Soil samples exhibiting the greatest concentration of organic vapors, staining,
or odors which may indicate the presence of contamination, will be submitted for laboratory analysis.
Laboratory analyses for various soil samples will be based upon soil sample locations and conditions.
Proposed analytical methods that will be utilized during the Site Assessment are summarized in
Table 1.
4.9 Groundwater Sampling
Subsequent to monitoring well elevation survey and gauging, groundwater samples will be collected
from representative existing and proposed monitoring wells for laboratory analysis. Groundwater
samples will not be collected from monitoring wells which contain a measurable thickness ofNAPL.
Prior to sample collection, groundwater conductivity, temperature and pH will be monitored. Each
well will be purged using clean, dedicated polypropylene bailers. Groundwater will be monitored
periodically during purging until groundwater conductivity, temperature and pH stabilize to within
10% of the original monitoring results, or a minimum of three well volumes have been evacuated.
Purge water will be discharged pursuant to MCP 310 CMR 40.0045. The samples will be collected
using the polypropylene purge bailers.
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date:11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 9 of 36
Proposed analytical methods that will be utilized during the Site Assessment are summarized in
Table 1.
4.10 Sample Handling Protocol
Samples will be collected in containers provided by the laboratory for specific analytical parameters.
Preservatives for aqueous and non -aqueous samples will be added by the laboratory performing the
analysis.
Aqueous and non -aqueous samples will be collected in accordance with the procedures required for
the specific analytical methodology. A chain -of -custody form will be filled out completely and
signed by the sampling personnel in the field. The original form will accompany the sample
containers at all times and must be signed and dated each time the sample is relinquished to another
person until the sample reaches the laboratory and the analysis is completed. The sample containers
will be labeled with the following information:
Project Name (or number) and address
Date and time of sample collection
Sample Location
Analysis to be performed
Sample identification
The chain -of -custody form shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
Project name, address and number
Date and time sample is collected
Sample location identification
Analysis requested and preservative (if required)
Number of containers
Analytical results turn -around time frame
Deliverables package requested
Sample type
Signatures of sampler and other personnel that acquire/relinquish custody of the samples
4.11 Identification of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
Resource Controls will submit a request to the DEP for an Massachusetts Geographical Information
Systems (Mass GIS) Map illustrating areas of critical environmental concern. In addition, during
site assessment activities, Resource Controls personnel will observe site conditions to confirm the
results of the Mass GIS information.
Title:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: I t/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 10 of 36
4.12 Reporting
Upon completion of the field investigation, receipt of analytical reports and Mass GIS information,
Resource Controls will prepare a Site Assessment Report which summarizes field screening results,
sampling methodologies, sample results, areas of critical environmental concern, and an evaluation
of the potential for contaminant migration.
The Site Assessment Report will provide a summary of field screening and sample collection
protocols. Field observations will be presented in the text of the report. Laboratory analytical results
and field screening data will be tabulated in the text of the report and laboratory reports attached as
appendices. The report will include a Site Locus Map indication the location of the Site, nearby
geographical features and surface drainage; a Water Table Contour Map illustrating water table
elevations of equal piezometric head elevation; and a NAPL Isoconcentration Plan illustrating the
distribution of NAPL using lines of equal product thickness.
4.13 Risk Characterization
Upon completion of the Site Assessment and Site Assessment Report, characterization of the risk
to health, safety, public welfare and the environment will be conducted pursuant to the
Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) 310 CMR 40.0900. Risk characterization is used to
establish whether a level of no significant risk exists or has been achieved at a disposal site. The
criteria used in this determination are described in 310 CMR 40.0900. The two basic approaches
are, a chemical specific approach which compares site concentrations to standards in soil and
groundwater or, a cumulative risk approach which compares site specific information to a cumulative
cancer risk limit of an excess lifetime cancer risk of one -in -one hundred thousand.
The results of the Risk Characterization shall be included as an appendix to the final Site Assessment
Report.
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
TitIc:QAPjP
Revision Number:0
Revision Date:11/25/98
Page: I of 36
a
'!;re
EPH with PAH 12 12
4
50
Metals (Cu, Cr, As)
7
7
0
45
RCRA 8 Metals
5
5
4
5
Semi-VOCs
12
12
4
50
(EPA 8270)
Dioxins
2
0
0
1
PCBs
l
1
0
0
�
,a,sS .c r1S .�'pSa SwR
9". ..0
Y2x.a
h9A ra'IMAS,
`'iz5 3�<k �4}H,
EPH with PAH
4
4
0
0
RCRA 8 Metals
4
4
0
0
Semi-VOCs
4
4
0
0
(EPA 8270)
Dioxins
1
l
0
0
PCBs
I
l
0
0
a,
O N
ao
o�
Haaw
q
0
U
A
4
v
N
a
w
o
d N
a�
v .s
�d
q
0 U
E
q
y
0
a
za
d d
Qfj rn
q
U
�
.o
a"
rn
�
\
o
rn
O
N
0
rn
O
M
0
rn
7
0
rn
n
0
0
A
00
00
rn
rn
R
ON
�
0
N
W
Vj
N
O
O
_O
N
N
u
O
O
O
O
a"
a
b
�
6
o
�"
¢
U
a
q
A
U
Lc
`n
u
ao'
U
U
N
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 13 of 36
Appendix E
5. Sampling Design (use multiple pages if needed)
Historical use of the site as a wood treating facility has resulted in widespread contamination of
sediments, soil, groundwater and surface water. The Site Assessment will investigate the vertical
and horizontal distribution of contamination, to the extent possible, in the following media in the
four Quadrants (Site Plan) of the Site:
Sediments
Soil
Overburden groundwater
Bedrock groundwater
Data collected during Geoprobe and test pit excavation assessment will assist in the placement of
additional soil borings and monitoring wells. Geoprobe locations will be installed in a grid square
pattern with each point located approximately 100 foot on center. Test pit excavation locations will
be based upon historical site assessment information, the results of the Geoprobe survey, and
potential site assessment activities to be conducted by EPA.
Soil screening and laboratory analysis conducted during soil boring activities will provide
information regarding the vertical extent of soil contamination from immediately below ground
surface to bedrock.
Installation of monitoring wells in the overburden and bedrock aquifers will provide groundwater
hydrogeological monitoring information regarding the presence of NAPL, horizontal and vertical
groundwater flow, hydraulic communication between the bedrock and overburden aquifers, and
hydraulic gradient. Groundwater samples will provide laboratory analytical data concerning
dissolved phase contamination in the overburden and bedrock aquifers.
Analytical procedures chosen for the Site Assessment were determined based upon historical use of
the site and previous assessment activities. Should the need for additional analytical procedures be
observed, a determination will be made by the Resource Controls Management Team to collect
additional samples for specific laboratory analysis.
2; U
�o �T
C
b �
o
b
a
d'
ti
T
ti
ti
N
T
b
b
N
cd
b
b
0
00
p~
v
000
It
v
Y
� U
�
N
� U
C y
N
N
V
Q,
o
o
cn
U
U
U
0
tjUVUO
0
0
0
x0
(U
(U
.N
A
o
4� H
U
cl
b0
00
C1.
O p
U
t.,
00
xrxn,,
� 'w
o
�
o
d'
o
N
o
00
N bQ
�
M
W)
Fes'.
,� IF
U
U
jay O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
V)CA
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ro
U .d
N
M
V
N
M
Vim'
UU+
(U ^
aU
�a
b
O '-F"
C)
M
C)
M
w b
U
V)
V)
U)
co
N
N
00
U
ti U
°
.k
N
00
U
ca U
'K
W
>
a�U
o
(a
W
>
i
U
o
A
o�
►O
00
O N
en
y M
O
hatxa
16
w
b
C
b
CN
0
O
O
b
�
�
C
00
vN
00
00
aS�
U a
rn v°
O
a
U
q
— py
00
�•��A.J
a o
ON
o
UO
vz
464.
W
o
°
Y '4
o >
00
.0 Ply
IO>cq
a >
roo
U ,O
o ti
Pxi
0��
o
W
bb
U
C
�
.ra
C
ON
00
W
w tU.
00
w
ti
C
c
U
N
M
Cd
d
a
U
o
a
m
a
v,
v
.O
it
�
0 V
� O
U
N
(� C
O
ti
•h
•�
d
U N
war
o .2
ai
Pi
T
bq
o;�o
0 0
cc
78
U
WU
�
f...'
y
�
O
P.
U
vi
d•
•.�:. 4\
O
2
o
.SOU
°
�v
b
V
Pi O
a°icna'a"�
a°c14
Cl)
v
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix G
6. Preventive Maintenance - Field Equipment
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 16 of 36
SOP
Instrument Activity Frequency Ref.
PID Check Battery Before Each Use 3c.
* Insert the appropriate reference number/letter from Appendix F, Method and SOP Reference Table.
I
N
a
a
E.
f`
u
m
a*
�
U
FBI
M
U O
V
ov
b �
ti
0 0
q
N G
o�
V
q �
y
k
� �
N
O
d �
u U
a
d
�
N
u
d
�
O N
d
�a
GT"
>
W
5
0
U
.0
UU
a
y
q
rr
n
P.
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX I
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 18 of 36
Instrument
Activity
Frequency
SOP Reff,
GUMS 8260
Check Trap/Column performance
Daily
2b
Check Gas
Daily
2b
Check Split Flow on GC
Biweekly
2b
Check Purge Gas Flow
Biweekly
2b
Check/Change Ferules, Inlet Liners
Daily
2b
Change Vacuum pump oil
Every 6 months
2b
Replace Column
As needed
2b
Clean Source
As needed
2b
Replace electron multiplier
As needed
2b
Replace ion source filament
As needed
2b
EPH 1.0
Check Trap/Column performance
Daily
lb
Modified Rev. 2
Check Gas Pressure and Flow
Daily
lb
7/98
Check/Change Ferules, Inlets Liners
Biweekly
lb
Check Teflon Purge Lines
Biweekly
lb
Replace o-Rings and Teflon block
Biweekly/As needed
lb
Change Vacuum pump oil
Biweekly
lb
Replace Column
Every 3 months
lb
Recondition/replace traps
Every 6 months
lb
Clean Source
As needed
lb
Replace electron multiplier
As needed
lb
As needed
lb
As needed
lb
ICP
Check acid waste, pump tubing
Daily
3b
Check Argon pressure
Daily
3b
Verify intensity counts for I" std.
Daily
3b
Check coolant level.
Monthly
3b
Make any standards that are low and
Weekly
3b
verify concentration prior to use.
Check Nebulizer and Spray Chamber
Weekly
3b
and clean if necessary.
Change filters.
Monthly
3b
Wipe off Rail on Autosampler
Monthly
3b
Dust off instrument.
Monthly
3b
Archive data to disk.
Monthly
3b
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
/:I"O►[ NI(I
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 19 of 36
Instrument
Activity
Frequency
Acceptance
Criteria
Corrective Action
SOP
Reff,
EPH 1.0
DFTPP Tuning
Every 24 hours
Table 4 below
Retune until criteria
lb
Modified
met.
Rev. 2 7/98
Initial Cal (6 std)
As needed
RSD</= 25% or
Recalibrate
lb
Corr. >/= 0.99
Method Blank
I per 20 samples
< RL
Determine cause,
lb
or per batch,
correct problem and
whichever is
reanalyze.
more frequent
Cont. Cal.
Every 24 hours or
+/- 25% of
Re -analyze, if still out
lb
every 20 samples
expected
then run is stopped and
the problem corrected.
Repeat all samples after
last successful cont.
cal.
Surrogate Standards
40-140% water
Repeat analysis, if still
lb
All standards,
and soil
out then qualify due to
blanks and
matrix interference.
samples.
Table 4
DFTPP Mass — Intensity Specifications
Mass
Intensity Required (relative abundance)
51
30-80 % of mass 198
68
< 2% of mass 69
70
< 2% of mass 69
127
25-75 % of mass 198
197
< 1 % of mass 198
198
Nominal Base peak, 100% relative
abundance
199
5-9 % of mass 198
275
10-30 % of mass 198
365
> 0.75% of mass 198
441
Present but less than mass 443
442
> 40 —110% of mass 198
443
15-24 % of mass 442
Site Name:
Site Location
APPENDIX J
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 20 of 36
Instrument
Activity
Frequency
Acceptance
Criteria
Corrective Action
SOP
Ref.
GUMS
BFB Tuning
Every 12 hours
Table 3 below
Retune until criteria
2b
8260
met.
Initial Cal (5-7 std)
As needed
RSD</= 15% or
Recalibrate
2b
Corr. >/= 0.99
Method Blank
1 per 20 samples
< RL
Determine cause,
2b
or per batch,
correct problem and
whichever is
reanalyze.
more frequent
Cont. Cal.
Every 12 hours
+/- 20% of
Re -analyze, if still out
2b
expected
then run is stopped and
the problem corrected.
Repeat all samples after
last successful cont.
cal.
Surrogate Standards
All standards,
80-120%/
Repeat analysis, if still
2b
blanks and
70-130%
out then qualify due to
samples.
Water/Soil
matrix interference.
Table 3
BFB Mass - Intensity Specifications
Mass Intensity Required (relative abundance)
50 15 to 40% of Mass 95
75 30 to 60% of Mass 95
95 Base peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5 to 9% of Mass 95
173 Less than 2% of Mass 174
174 Greater than 50% of Mass 95
175 5 to 9% of Mass 174
176 Greater than 95% but less than 101 % of Mass 174
177 5 to 9% of Mass 176
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX J
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 21 of 36
Instrument
Activity
Frequency
Acceptance
Criteria
Corrective Action
SOP
Reff,
ICP
IPC
Once, after
+/-5% of
Correct problem and
3b
Calibration
True Value for
recalibrate
EPA Method
200.7
ICV
Once, after
+/-10% of
Correct problem and
3b
Calibration
True Value
recalibrate
ICB
Once, after ICV
+/- %Z RL
Correct problem and
3b
recalibrate
RL
Start & Finish
+/- 20% of True
Use caution regarding
3b
Value
low level samples
ICSAB
Start & Finish
+/- 20% of True
Correct problem; then
3b
Value
recalibrate/reanalyze
samples
CCV
10% of analytical
+/- 10% of True
Correct problem and
3b
samples
Value
reanalyze affected
samples
CCB
Following each
+/- %, RL
Correct problem and
3b
CCV
reanalyze affected
samples
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 22 of 36
Appendix K
7. Sample Handling and Custody Requirements (use multiple pages if needed)
All samples collected for laboratory analysis will be traced from collection, to shipment, to
laboratory receipt under Chain -of -Custody protocol. The original form of the Chain -of -Custody is
to accompany the sample containers at all times and must be signed and dated each time the sample
is relinquished to another person until the sample reaches the laboratory and the analysis is
completed. Each sample container will be labeled with the following information:
• Project name and number
• Sample location
• Collection time and date
• Analysis to be performed
• Sample identification
• Name of sampler
• Preservative (if applicable)
An example of a Chain -of -Custody form is attached. The original Chain -of -Custody will
accompany the samples until the project is complete. Original Chains -of -Custody will remain in
the permanent project file. Copies of the Chains -of -Custody will also remains with the project
manager, the laboratory manager and attached to the laboratory analytical reports.
Field screening samples will be labeled in the field by the field scientist. Field screening results will
be recorded in a log book by the field geologist and copies of the field notes will be maintained as
part of the project permanent file. Field notes will include the following:
• Project name and address
• Date and time sample was collected
• Sample location identification
• Field screening results
• Site conditions at time of sample collection and screening
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix L
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 23 of 36
alytes
Analytical
Method
Detection Limit
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/mg/kg
QuantitationR
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/mg/kg
Precision
(%RSD)
Water & Soil
Accuracy,
(%R)
Water & Soil
cenaphthene
lb
0.146/0.060
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
cenaphthylene
lb
0.121/0.044
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
thracene
lb
0.128/0.059
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
enzo(a)anthracene
lb
0.114/0.042
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
enzo(a)pyrene
lb
0.093/0.040
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
enzo(b)fluorathene
lb
0.084/0.055
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
enzo(k)fluorathene
lb
0.109/0.054
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
hrysene
lb
0.073/0.048
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
ibenzo(a,h)anthracene
lb
0.166/0.062
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
luoranthene
lb
0.117/0.053
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
luorene
1b
0.139/0.064
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
ndeno(1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
lb
0.288/0.054
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
enzo(g,h,I)perylene
lb
0.129/0.054
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
aphthalene
lb
0.153/0.051
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
henanthrene
lb
0.154/0.053
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
yrene
lb
0.102/0.058
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
Methylnaphthalene
lb
0.153/0.052
1.0/0.25
25
40-140
9CjsAliphatics
lb
29.0/4.00
100150
25
40-140
9-C36Aliphatics
1b
10.3/1.13
100150
25
40-140
II-C22 Aromatics
lb
17.5/8.42
100150
25
40-140
1 Precision is % recovery +/- 3 X %RSD
2 Accuracy is % recovery in comparison to the true value
ug/L = micrograms per liter
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix L
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 24 of 36
nalytes
Analytical
Method
Detection Limit
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/mg/kg
QuantitationR
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/ug/kg
Precision'
(%RSD)
Water/Soil
ichlorodifluoromethane
2b
0.24/5.38
2.0/63
20
hloromethane
2b
0.29/3.93
2.0/63
20
Vinyl Chloride
2b
0.13/14.63
2.0/25
20
Chloroethane
2b
0.37/18.65
2.0/63
20
romomethane
2b
0.46/36.62
2.0/25
20
richlorofluoromethane
2b
0.50/19.73
2.0/63
20
1,1-Dichloroethene
2b
0.32/21.33
2.0/25
20
Methylene Chloride
2b
0.20/26.64
5.0/63
20
ethyl-tert-butyl-ether
2b
0.59/13.02
2.0/25
20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
2b
0.27/17.48
2.0/25
20
1,1-Dichloroethane
2b
0.12/15.86
1.0/25
20
2,2-Dichloropropane
2b
0.86/14.43
2.0/25
20
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
2b
0.11/14.56
2.0/25
20
Chloroform
2b
0.19/12.50
2.0/25
20
romochloromethane
2b
0.17/8.74
2.0/25
20
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
2b
0.36/11.8
2.0/25
20
1,1-Dichloropropee
2b
0.28/8.98
2.0/25
20
Carbon Tetrachloride
2b
0.46/11.71
2.0/25
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
2b
0.26/8.49
2.0/25
20
Benzene
2b
0.13/6.33
1.0/25
20
richlororethene
2b
0.29n.86
2.0/25
20
1,2-Dichloropropane
2b
0.14/6.40
2.0/25
20
romodichloromethane
2b
0.23/7.56
2.0/25
20
ibromomethane
2b
0.23/8.45
2.0/25
20
is-1,3-Dichloropropee
2b
0.24/10.07
1.0/25
20
Toluene
2b
0.20/8.85
2.0/25
20
trans-1,3-Dichloropropee
2b
0.28n.39
1.0/25
20
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
2b
0.42/7.25
2.0/25
20
1,2-Dibromoethane
2b
0.31/4.28
2.0/25
20
Accuracy,
(% R)
Water/Soil
60-140/70-130
60-140/70-130
60-140/70-130
60-140/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
80-120/70-130
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix L
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 1 t/25/98
Page: 25 of 36
nalytes
Analytical
Method
Detection Limit
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/mg/kg
QuantitationR
Limit
Water/Soil
ug/L/ug/kg
Precision'
(%RSD)
Water/Soil
Accuracy,
(%R)
Water/Soil
1,3-Dichloropropane
2b
0.16/3.31
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
etrachloroethene
2b
0.44/7.28
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
ibromochloromethane
2b
0.49/6.06
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
hlorobenzene
2b
0.10/7.68
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
2b
0.25/10.69
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Ethyl Benzene
2b
0.21/7.98
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
& p-Xylene
2b
0.51/15.03
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Xylene
2b
0.15/7.34
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Styrene
2b
0.22/6.26
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
romoform
2b
0.62/8.26
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Isopropylbenzene
2b
0.34/6.85
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
2b
0.43/3.50
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2b
0.52/5.96
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
romobenzene
2b
0.20/8.00
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Propylbenzene
2b
0.27/8.53
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Chlorotoluene
2b
0.13/8.63
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Chlorotoluene
2b
0.29/8.70
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
2b
0.34/6.39
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
t-Butylbenzene
2b
0.30/9.86
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
2b
0.18/6.21
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
sec-Butylbenzene
2b
0.28/8.69
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Isopropyltoluene
2b
0.34/8.05
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
2b
0.25/7.29
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2b
0.15/7.47
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
ri-Butylbenzene
2b
0.30/8.43
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2b
0.21/5.67
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
2b
2.79/10.36
5.0/63
20
80-120/70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2b
0.27/5.52
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
exachlorobutadiene
2b
0.77/17.69
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Naphthalene
2b
0.55/3.36
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
2b
1.15/5.89
2.0/25
20
80-120/70-130
Precision is % recovery +/- 3 X %RSD
2 Accuracy is % recovery in comparison to the true value
ug/L = micrograms per liter
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA
Appendix L
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 26 of 36
Detection Limit
QuantitationR
Analytical
Limit
Limit
Precision'
AccuracyZ
alytes
Method
Water/Soil
Water/Soil
(%RSD)
(%R)
ug/L./mg/kg
ug/L/mg/kg
Water & Soil
Water & Soil
enic
3b
8.34/0.413
25/3.9
20
70-130
hromium
3b
6.4510.567
10/1.6
20
70-130
Popper
36
3.35/0.238
25/3.9
20
70-130
I Precision is % recovery +/- 3 X %RSD
2 Accuracy is % recovery in comparison to the true value
ug/L = micrograms per liter
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX M
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Field Quality Control Requirements
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 27 of 36
C Sample EPH/PAH
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Duplicate
I per 20 samples
< quantitation limit
Results will be
qualified or rejected
Cooler Temperature
1 per cooler
4 to VC
Results will be
Blank
qualified or rejected
Bottle Blank
Not required — bottles
< quantitation limit
Results will be
purchased re -cleaned
I qualified or rejected
QC Sample 8260
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Duplicate
1 per 20 samples
</= 20%
Results will be
qualified or rejected
Equipment Blank
I per 20 samples
< quantitation limit
Depending on the
amount of
contamination, the
results will be
qualified or rejected.
VOA Trip Blank
1 per cooler
< quantitation limit
Depending on the
amount of
contamination, the
results will be
qualified or rejected.
Cooler Temperature
1 per cooler
4 to 6°C
Results will be
Blank
qualified or rejected
Bottle Blank
Not required — bottles
< quantitation limit
Results will be
purchased re-cleanedqualified
or rejected
C Sample ICP
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Duplicate
I per 20 samples
< quantitation limit
Results will be
qualified or rejected
Cooler Temperature
1 per cooler
0 to 60C
Results will be
Blank
qualified or rejected
Bottle Blank
Not required — bottles
< quantitation limit
Results will be
purchased re-cleanedqualified
or rejected
Site Name:
Site Location:
I_1»0 ► 17i7T
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Laboratory Quality Control Requirements
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 28 of 36
C Sample EPH/PAH
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Reagent/Method
1 every batch of 20
< quantitation limit
Depending on the
Blank
samples
amount of
contamination, the
results will be
qualified or rejected.
Duplicate
1 every batch of 20
</= 50%
Repeat if no
samples
assignable cause, if
still out qualify results
due to matrix
interference or
heterogeneity
Matrix Spike
1 every batch of 20
40-140%
Repeat if no
samples
assignable cause, if
still out qualify results
due to matrix
interference or
heterogeneity
Laboratory Control
1 every batch of 20
40-140%
Repeat if no
Sample
samples
assignable cause, if
still the samples may
require re -pre and re-
analyze.
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX M
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 29 of 36
QC Sample 8260
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Reagent/Method
l every batch of
< quantiation limit
Depending on the
Blank
samples
amount of
contamination, the
results will be
qualified or rejected.
Matrix Spike
5% per parameter per
Analvtes Water
Repeat if no
matrix
Limits/Soil Limits
assignable cause, if
1, 1 -Dichloroethene 80-
still out qualify
120%/70-130%
results due to matrix
Benzene 80-1201/o/70-130%
interference or
Trichloroethene 80-
heterogeneity
120%/70-130%
Toluene 80-120%/70-130%
Chlorobenzene 80-
1200/o/70-130%
All others 80-1200/o/70-
130%
Matrix Spike
5% per parameter per
Analvtes Water
Repeat if no
Duplicate
matrix
Limits/Soil Limits
assignable cause, if
1,1-Dichloroethene 80-
still out qualify
120%/70-130%
results due to matrix
Benzene 80-1201/o/70-130%
interference or
Trichloroethene 80-
heterogeneity
120%/70-130%
Toluene 80-120%/70-130%
Chlorobenzene 80-
120%/70-130%
All others 80-120%/70-
130%
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX M
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 30 of 36
C Sample 8260
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Laboratory Control
1 every batch of samples
Analytes Water
Repeat if no assignable
Limits/Soil Limits
cause, if still out the
Sample
1, 1 -Dichloroethene 80-
samples may require re-
120%/70-130%
prep and re -analyze.
Benzene 80-120%/70-
130%
Trichloroethene 80-
1200/o/70-130%
Toluene 80-1200/o/70-
130%
Chlorobenzene 80-
120%/70-130%
All others 80-12011/o/70-
130%
Site Name:
Site Location:
APPENDIX M
Hatheway & Patterson Facility
County Street, Mansfield, MA
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: 11/25/98
Page: 31 of 36
QC Sample ICP
Frequency
Acceptance Criteria
Corrective Action
Reagent/Method
1 every batch of 20
< quantitation limit
Depending on the
Blank
samples
amount of
contamination, the
results will be
ualified or re'ected.
Matrix Spike
1 every batch of 10
75-125%
Repeat if no
samples
assignable cause , if
still out qualify
results.
Duplicate
1 every batch of 10
</= 20%
Repeat if no
samples
assignable cause, if
still out qualify
results.
Laboratory Control
1 every batch of 20
85-115%
Repeat if no
Sample
samples
assignable cause, if
still out the samples
may require re -prep
and re -analyze.
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 32 of 36
Appendix N
9. Data Management and Documentation (use multiple pages if needed)
All field activities will be recorded by field personnel in permanently bound notebooks with
individually numbered pages which are maintained for all field activities. Field notes will be copied
daily upon completion of field activities and will be maintained in the permanent site file. Field
logbooks will be archived at Resource Controls, 474 Broadway, Pawtucket, Rhode Island and/or the
Mansfield Field Office located at
All entries in the notebooks are made with permanent ink, and corrections are made using a single
line through the mistake with the initials and date of the individual who made them. Entries include
sampling location, time, date, weather conditions, subcontractors and equipment on -site, site visitors,
work to be conducted, parameters to be measured, and any problems encountered during field
activities.
Analytical samples are recorded in a permanently bound laboratory notebook, specific for each
instrument. A brief narrative is included at the end of each analytical run that includes any problems
encountered with the standards, samples, blanks or QC samples. Some of the automated analytical
equipment (GC and GC/MS) have computer generated analytical runs and any problems associated
with the analytical runs are flagged and noted on the computer reports. If any corrective action is
taken it will be noted in narrative in the instrument notebook (see the laboratory QAP for more
detail).
The following deliverables will be provided by the laboratory:
• Sample data results sheets similar in format to a CLP Form I for all field sampling including
PE sample results, equipment/rinsate blanks and trip blanks.
• Surrogate recoveries and acceptance limits.
• Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results and acceptance limits.
• Duplicate sample results.
• Method/reagent blank results.
• Calibration standards/Reference Standards/LFB reports.
• A summary or narrative of any deviations from the QC criteria as well as observations about
the samples (i.e. missed holding times, trip blank contamination, and reference standards or
check standards outside of criteria).
The following deliverables will not be required, but must be maintained by the laboratory and may
be requested at a later date:
All raw data including chromatograms.
Copies of Instrument logbooks.
Copies of internal chains -of -custody.
All reports are generated in hard copy form. A computer with sample results can also be provided.
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 33 of 36
Appendix O
10. Assessment and Response Actions (use multiple pages if needed)
The project manager will be responsible for scheduling an audit of the field sampling team on the
first day of sampling. This systems audit will ensure that the filed sampling team is following the
documents procedures and that the sampling collection is proceeding according to the QAPjP and
will meet the project objectives. Copies of the report will be sent to the site project manager, the
EPA project manager and maintained in the site files.
Any deficiencies found during the field audit or problems encountered during this investigation
require corrective action. The site project manager will be notified immediately if any problems are
encountered in the field. Minor adjustments to the sampling design, such as moving a soil boring
several feet to avoid an obstruction, may proceed with notification of the project manager and
documentation in the field notebook. Major corrective actions, such as encountering buried drums,
require immediate notification of the EPA project manager prior to proceeding with the drilling.
The laboratory must maintain its certification with the State of Massachusetts throughout the course
of the project.
If appropriate, the lab may be audit prior to the start of the project to verify their capabilities to
perform these analyses.
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 34 of 36
Appendix P
11. Project Reports (use multiple pages if needed)
Upon completion of the field investigation, receipt of analytical reports and Mass GIS information,
Resource Controls will prepare a Site Assessment Report which summarizes field screening results,
sampling methodologies, sample results, areas of critical environmental concern, and an evaluation
of the potential for contaminant migration for the Hatheway and Patterson Facility and the Clemmey
Tank Site.
The Site Assessment Report will provide a summary of field screening and sample collection
protocols. Field observations will be presented in the text of the report. Laboratory analytical results
and field screening data will be tabulated in the text of the report and laboratory reports attached as
appendices. The report will include a Site Locus Map indication the location both Sites, nearby
geographical features and surface drainage; Water Table Contour Maps illustrating water table
contours of equal piezometric head elevation; and, if applicable, NAPL Isoconcentration Plans
illustrating the distribution of NAPL using lines of equal product thickness.
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 35 of 36
Appendix Q
12. Data Validation (use multiple pages if needed)
a. Data Review Process
The Region I. EPA -NE Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluation Environmental
Analyses. 7/96 will be followed.
Analyte concentrations will be checked against contaminant levels in equipment/rinsate blanks and
method/reagent blanks to identify possible sources of false positives.
A review of all QC analyses will be performed to assess the data quality. Any encountered
deviations not documented in the narrative will be rectified with the laboratory.
Analytical QA/QC will rely upon system audits, performance evaluation audits, and internal audits
currently in place at the laboratory that will be analyzing samples collected from the Hatheway and
Patterson Facility and the Clemmey Tank Site.
A system audit is an on -site review of the laboratory's quality assurance practices and operating
procedures. The laboratory has agreed to audits by various government agencies and clients when
requested.
Performance audits provide a systematic check of the quality of the laboratory data and of the
measurement systems. The laboratory participates in blind laboratory performance evaluations for
the EPA as part of the water supply and water pollution programs and for the State of New York,
running their proficiency sample twice a year. The laboratory participates in the American Industrial
Hygiene Association's Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing program for the analysis
of lead in paint, soil and dust wipes.
Internal audits are performed on a quarterly basis or as needed in the event an out -of -control situation
is discovered. NCR reports are initiated and completed as a result of any audit findings. Follow up
of out -of -control situations is performed until the analyses is determined to be in control. Internal
audits are kept on file by the QA/QC Manager.
Title: QAPjP
Revision Number: 0
Site Name: Hatheway & Patterson Facility Revision Date: 11/25/98
Site Location: County Street, Mansfield, MA Page: 36 of 36
Appendix R
13. Data Usability (use multiple pages if needed)
Environmental assessment activities at the Hatheway and Patterson Facility and the Clemmey Tank
Site are being conducted as part of the `Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative" which is
coordinated by the EPA.
The Hatheway and Patterson Facility and the Clemmey Tank Site, which are contiguous and cover
some 50 acres, are listed 21 E sites under 310 CMR 40.0000, due to known or suspected releases of
hazardous substances. Several EPA funded preliminary response actions have been performed at
the Hatheway and Patterson Facility. The Clemmey Tank Site is subject to a DEP "Notice Of
Responsibility", but it remains stagnant with an unknown environmental condition. Both sites are
abandoned. As a result, redevelopment of the sites has been severely hindered for many years.
The proposed site assessment activities are designed to clearly define the condition of each site,
around the frame work of the MCP. To assure the quality of the investigations, all work will be
performed under the direction of a Massachusetts Licensed Site Professional. The ultimate goal of
this project is to assess the immediate levels of contamination known to exist at each site and
determine the extent of contamination. Subsequent goals will include the development of strategic
plans for remediation and economic redevelopment of the sites, in conjunction with an ongoing
upgrade to the adjacent commuter rail system. Portions of the land on both the Hatheway and
Patterson Facility and the Clemmey Tank Site are expected to be used for parking and/or access
roads for the expanded station project.
USGS - BROCKTON, MASS. QUADRANGLE
SCALE 1:25,000
i 1 2 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
RESOURCE
Locus MAP
CONTROLS
�
The proven solution to your environmental needs.
474 Broadwayy, Pawtucket, RI 02860
401 728-6880 Fos 401 727-1849
18 lincaln Avenue, Scituate, MA 02066
781 545-3908
HATHEWAY & PATTERSON COMPANY, INC.
MANSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS
1:25,000 1 A5440
1 1 1 1 /24/98
I a6/-Va/ L G I C 1 V13100**9 10**5V 1.00 � =.
S1L3Sf1HOVSSVW 'a1313SNVW
311S NNVI .13W04310
NVId US
906f-9Y9 l9L
990Z0 yA 's'Wnip9 'MwAV woun 9l
6191-LZL too Mod 0t99-9ZL l0Y
099ZO 91 'WM>nNod ' APO" YLh
-a0ow Iulummims jnal ni w9npm uanad 9LU
si011No)
DI0os31
£-Md
O
5-SS
0
L-SS
4—Md
unlovj
NOSN31LVd—AVM3HLVH
6-SS
0
dVW N809NdS 9461�
213N21 02lOjWt12!
j0 NOLLVOOI MN80j
O 0
DS y-ss Ol-SS
I--Md
X0xx
NOI1VO01 31dWVS 110S 3Ovjos O
NOI1V001 113M ONIHODNOW 03SOdO8d
aN3031
133�JiS
l 6S
186/*Z/ t 41 £ 1 NldOtitiB I Oti S;V
su3snHOVSSVVI 'Ol3l.JSNVW
'ONI IMVdW00 NOS83ILVd V J.VM3HIVH
NVId US
9060-S4S l9L
99ZO VYI 'olDnips 'anuanV ui00wl 91
Wl-LZL o00n •o 0999 ZL l01
09OZO IN '1 1 7 d D 9 Ki
'6DaaU 104UOWUWInUa m06 01 U011MOS uanwd ayl
51011N0�
33100S31
96/9Z-11/9 031dYiVS/03o0V'O Sll3M
96 11 9 - l-MS
96 ll 9 - 1-03S
96/6l/ol - t-ss
96/61/01 - lOdHaS
V \ :\
/ Ol-MYI
\ V3NV 3VN01S DOOM
SONV113M d0 0
Am XOSddV
V38V 3Otl801S DOOM
O /
96-MN Zl-Mil % 1 L Md
6-MN L $ Yi ( I 6-Md /
F1I I 9-Md
tl9p 8-Mry Z 1NV8civnb
2 1Ne8adnb
0 /
S-M
9rd l -
x__x---x--x—x x x x
8 S-MN� x—x hx MYi
x x x x—x—x—x—x—x—x— I I
-x—x—x—x—x—x—x-- — -- — NOLLtldo NOo IIVS 031VonosNoo
NOI1Va0dN00 INS 031VOII0SN00 x-7r _z—A=k='� O
Z-MW y�-X-�-- £-Md ' Zl-Md
o _mN� o T"-f _ ° 0000� _� 1Nd�aen�lp d v3aV 30VaoO DOOM O O
l 1Nd2�adnb 9 r�®� Z�Md =l' ----'-'--'- O\-Md /��,
LA—�JL_J�_�
13381S A1Nn00
z
z
I L-MH
SNOIIVOOI 3IdYWS 390NdO3O
O
N011VOOI 31dYNS N31VM 30Vdaf1S
N011VOOI 01,1I409 IIOS
NOIMOI 31dY1VS IIOS 30VAN(1S
0
NOILVO01 3ldMS 1113Y1103S
0
400001 I13M ONI40.0014 ONIISI%3
9
NOIIVOOI 113M ONIaOLNOIY 03SOdONd
N�3T